Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-10-2019, 12:47 PM
GrandSlam GrandSlam is online now
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 620
Default .30-30 scope

My eyes aren't what they used to be, so looking for suggestions for scoping my lever action. Was thinking low powered variable with Weaver see through rings just as a backup?

Sent from my SM-G970W using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-10-2019, 12:53 PM
Jeff336 Jeff336 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: NE Calgary
Posts: 115
Default

I have a Leupold VX-2 on my 30-30. It’s 2-7x33 with a duplex reticle. I really like it. It has good eye relief and not too much magnification. Makes it a great walking gun. I also have a VX freedom 1.5-4x20 that is nice too.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-10-2019, 01:35 PM
cody c cody c is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,032
Default

The see through rings might be a bit tall, is it for a 94, 94AE, 336 etc?

There is those scout scope setups that some folks like as well.
__________________
feeding the occasional troll.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-10-2019, 02:18 PM
Jeron Kahyar Jeron Kahyar is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,313
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GrandSlam View Post
My eyes aren't what they used to be, so looking for suggestions for scoping my lever action. Was thinking low powered variable with Weaver see through rings just as a backup?

Sent from my SM-G970W using Tapatalk
I would say something in the 1.5-4x or 2-7x range would do nicely. I would also say nevermind to the see through rings. If you are concerned about the irons and eyesight not much point in having see through rings. They will just add cost and may be to tall forcing you to add some sort of cheek riser as well.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-10-2019, 02:25 PM
GrandSlam GrandSlam is online now
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 620
Default

It's a Mossberg 464. Thinking either a 2-7x32 or 1-4x20. Opinions on the Leupold Freedom vs an older Redfield Revolution?

Sent from my SM-G970W using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-10-2019, 02:33 PM
Dick284's Avatar
Dick284 Dick284 is online now
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dreadful Valley
Posts: 14,608
Default

Fixed 4x

As long as it’s for a Marlin or a Win 94AE.

If it’s a true top eject ‘94, it gets pretty funky and pricy to scope it.
__________________


There are no absolutes
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-10-2019, 03:28 PM
stob stob is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,420
Default

Would black powder scope work?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-10-2019, 04:46 PM
double gun double gun is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Alberta
Posts: 4,279
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GrandSlam View Post
My eyes aren't what they used to be, so looking for suggestions for scoping my lever action. Was thinking low powered variable with Weaver see through rings just as a backup?

Sent from my SM-G970W using Tapatalk
I would ditch the see through rings and run a vx3 1.5-5 or the 1-4 for a less expensive option.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-10-2019, 04:49 PM
Pioneer2 Pioneer2 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,327
Default Fixed

4X or 6X
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-10-2019, 05:27 PM
303 Epps 303 Epps is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 98
Default

I have a Leupold M8 on my 30-30 and it's great. Fixed 4x gets you to 150 yds no problem.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-10-2019, 05:52 PM
Pioneer2 Pioneer2 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,327
Default 8" bullet drop

200 yards no problem with a scope
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-10-2019, 06:03 PM
CranePete CranePete is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Williams Lake, BC
Posts: 307
Default scope

I run a B&L 1.5 - 6X on my 444 Marlin (thanks, Yvan). Works very well.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-10-2019, 07:02 PM
Prewar Prewar is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bonnyville
Posts: 190
Default

See Thru rings...you from Newfoundland?!!! Those come from a time when scopes were of lower quality and were not trusted so having irons available was a good ideal. Unnecessary, ugly, and your cheek may be far off the stock with those tall rings.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-10-2019, 07:09 PM
EZM's Avatar
EZM EZM is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 11,858
Default

Never understood see thru rings ....... you still have to try and see your target through the rings which are far smaller compared to a scope eyepiece which is larger.

With a 1x or even a 1.5 on the lower setting, you should be able to shoulder the gun and acquire the target much faster compared to trying to peep under and through a scope then try and use the irons.

It is also awkward to have to raise up off the stock as the peep thru rings, when using the scope because they sit so much higher.

That was my experience using a similar set up anyways. Ended up going back to a lower ring and lower variable scope and haven't looked back.

As for scope, a 1-4 x 32mm is perfect. I like Leopold products, so that would be my choice.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-11-2019, 06:17 AM
Pioneer2 Pioneer2 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,327
Default Only thing

About 1-4X scopes is on lower magnifications you can see your front sight and 1/2 the barrel!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-11-2019, 01:09 PM
Dean2's Avatar
Dean2 Dean2 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Near Edmonton
Posts: 15,043
Default

I run a Leupold VXIII1.5x5 on my Marlin 1895 45-70. It has been on htere for 30 years. Works great and makes shooting to 250-300 yards a very doable proposition. Sight it 3.5" high at 100 yards. This gives me 5.9" low at 200 yards, 18" low at 250 and 36" low at 300,with a 350 grain RN at 1900 fps. You can use the top of the thick wire on a duplex reticle on 5 power to get to 250 yards. 30-30 should have a similar trajectory.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-11-2019, 04:46 PM
badbrass badbrass is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,744
Default

I run a Vari-X -III 1.5X5X20 on mine for 27 years, got my largest buck with it!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-11-2019, 10:24 PM
fordtruckin's Avatar
fordtruckin fordtruckin is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: In the woods
Posts: 8,923
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick284 View Post
Fixed 4x

As long as it’s for a Marlin or a Win 94AE.

If it’s a true top eject ‘94, it gets pretty funky and pricy to scope it.
Ran a weaver k4 on a 336 for several years before swapping it over to a .22lr. Easy on the wallet and for the money I feel it was a great scope. Could look for a leupold if you don’t want to go weaver. For the limitations of a 30/30 I’d definitely do fixed power.
__________________
I feel I was denied, critical, need to know Information!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.