|
|
02-21-2013, 01:32 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fort Saskatchewan
Posts: 3,698
|
|
Thoughts on the 270wsm vs wood buffalo
based on factory ammo, what do you think the best choice for a buffalo would be? I would like to use my 270 wsm just to say I killed a buff with one. I do have a 300win mag but I truly believe the 270wsm would be up to the challenge. What are your guys thoughts on bullet selection with factory ammo. I know most would say the one that groups the tightest but in all honestey minute of buffalo is quite large.
|
02-21-2013, 01:39 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
|
|
If I had both and shot both comfortably I'd use the .300. I see no reason to take any sort of risk with an animal, no matter how small, simply to say that I did it. Now if you didn't have the .300 perhaps the .270 would be good. I've never shot the .270wsm so can't say for sure, but the printed ballistics look impressive. Been considering buying one. I wouldn't use my .270WIN however.
|
02-21-2013, 02:49 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,171
|
|
IF you used your 270WSM, factory Winchecter Supreme 150gr XP3's get my vote. Next would be 140gr TSX's if available.
I love 140gr Accubonds in my 270WSM (reloads but did use the WS factory rounds) but I think the tough hide of a buffalo and not be the best. I could be wrong b/c I have had awesome results with this caliber and bullet combo on elk/moose/etc.
If using 300WM, factory WS 180gr XP3's or the AB's get my vote. If you reloaded, 200gr AB's or TTSX's.
|
02-21-2013, 02:53 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fort Saskatchewan
Posts: 3,698
|
|
Ive got a few boxes of a 140gr tsx that i know will do the job. I seen a 110gr ttsx travel through 4' of moose at 80 yards this fall. Im sure the 140's will be plenty but I wouldnt mind trying the 150gr xp3s
|
02-21-2013, 03:06 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Wainwright
Posts: 4,499
|
|
Personally I would go with the .300 I have seen them take clips of 180 gr 30-06 to the bolier room and not even flinch...still went down but took em...
not saying it cant be done but...if a wood buffalos tail is up they are either discharging or chargeing...and it seems their tail is always up...
Mine was huge F&W thought around 2600 lbs
Neil
__________________
APA AIR
|
02-21-2013, 03:16 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Brooks
Posts: 209
|
|
If you hit the soft spot a little behind the lower part of the ear either will work fine.
|
02-21-2013, 03:37 PM
|
|
I heard there was a minimum if 180 grain allowed for buffalo?
|
02-21-2013, 05:08 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 3,661
|
|
If i ever get drawn i think ill just take the 338wm and 250gr grandslams and call her good.
|
02-21-2013, 05:41 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 867
|
|
Wouldnt even think twice about using my bow 270 wsm will have no problem
|
02-21-2013, 05:50 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 129
|
|
I may be mistaken, but I thought it was .30 caliber minimum? Maybe that was only b.c.?
|
02-21-2013, 05:54 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 56
|
|
Use the 300 as it has the proper grain bullets to get the job done. Remember buffalo have thick hides, massive bones and a lot of muscle to get through before you hit the vitals. A 30 caliber rifle should probably be considered the min size you would want to use. Remember you are not putting down a cow and shooting it in the head at 6 feet. This is a hunting scenaro where anything could happen and you might need the bigger gun to get things done.
Good luck with what ever you choose.
|
02-21-2013, 05:55 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: In The Zone.......
Posts: 1,686
|
|
The only way a 270wsm will kill a bison is with an accubond. When are we going?
|
02-21-2013, 06:11 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,345
|
|
__________________
.....Only here for buy n sell....
|
02-21-2013, 06:44 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 21,399
|
|
Let's see now. Bull can weigh around 1500 lbs, chest about 3 ft. across. The .270 will be staying home when my turn comes and I'll be wiping the dust off the .338.
Grizz
__________________
"Indeed, no human being has yet lived under conditions which, considering the prevailing climates of the past, can be regarded as normal."
John E. Pfeiffer The Emergence of Man
written in 1969
|
02-21-2013, 07:36 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: High River, AB
Posts: 10,788
|
|
Never mind caliber, that isn't the most concerning thought. Shot placement more than most animals is. I have shot bison with a. 338wm and a .375h&h with poor results due to being fooled by that thick neck of hair. Study the construction of this animal and then a well placed 270wsm will do the job. You cannot replace good shot placement by simply upping bullet diameter. A poorly placec shot on bison makes no difference no matter how big or fast your bullet is. They are extremely hardy, and that big mane can cause confusion as to where to put it.
|
02-21-2013, 07:39 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: High River, AB
Posts: 10,788
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grizzly Adams
Let's see now. Bull can weigh around 1500 lbs, chest about 3 ft. across. The .270 will be staying home when my turn comes and I'll be wiping the dust off the .338.
Grizz
|
Awesome, how many have you dropped with a single shot or ANY for that matter?
|
02-21-2013, 08:11 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,713
|
|
I am sure it would work fine if the shot and animal position is good. I think a bigger is better type of thinking would apply here if shot angle etc. is less than ideal. my thinking is it it would be the perfect excuse to buy a .375hh.
__________________
There are some who can live without wild things, and some who cannot. Aldo Leopold
|
02-21-2013, 08:25 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: High River, AB
Posts: 10,788
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bdub
I am sure it would work fine if the shot and animal position is good. I think a bigger is better type of thinking would apply here if shot angle etc. is less than ideal. my thinking is it it would be the perfect excuse to buy a .375hh.
|
No, I failed to one shot kill the first 2 with .338wm and .375ouch. The 3rd one dropped stone cold dead to the almighty. ...................7mm-08. Ok, by that time, I had gained a wee bit of experience. My 4th, dropped to the almighty "swede". Not to confuse anyone, these were cull kills, not bonafide hunts....
|
02-21-2013, 08:42 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,713
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gitrdun
No, I failed to one shot kill the first 2 with .338wm and .375ouch. The 3rd one dropped stone cold dead to the almighty. ...................7mm-08. Ok, by that time, I had gained a wee bit of experience. My 4th, dropped to the almighty "swede". Not to confuse anyone, these were cull kills, not bonafide hunts....
|
Where did you hit them. Any tricks to bullet placement, they are an odd shaped animal and I have never really studied there anatomy. I have ran into a few of them in the Sikkani river country. Pretty intimidating animal when you walk into them in the bush.
__________________
There are some who can live without wild things, and some who cannot. Aldo Leopold
|
02-21-2013, 09:00 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: High River, AB
Posts: 10,788
|
|
The first 2, I took aim for what I figured would be a neck shot, much as I did for any ungulate as elk, deer or moose. But the thick cape obviously hides the small kill zone. The next two were shot between the eyes, full frontal. I have a skull here on my wall. In a hunting scenario, I would study the anatomy much as you suggest.
|
02-21-2013, 09:11 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: S.E. British Columbia
Posts: 4,579
|
|
fyi, in BC the regs state that:
"ammunition to hunt bison must be constructed with a 175 grain or larger bullet, which retains 2,712 joules (2000 ft lbs) or more energy at 100 m."
|
02-21-2013, 10:03 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,253
|
|
Don't bother with accubonds, 140tsx is the only choice
|
02-21-2013, 10:37 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 12,558
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weatherbyguy
I heard there was a minimum if 180 grain allowed for buffalo?
|
Seems like I recall seeing that somewhere as well.
|
02-21-2013, 10:39 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 12,558
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by twofifty
fyi, in BC the regs state that:
"ammunition to hunt bison must be constructed with a 175 grain or larger bullet, which retains 2,712 joules (2000 ft lbs) or more energy at 100 m."
|
Thats OK... Alberta bison are way easier to kill than BC bison
That must be where I read that though.
|
02-22-2013, 08:02 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: In The Zone.......
Posts: 1,686
|
|
243s are legal for alberta bison in zama. The ones east of high level you could use a 22lr if you wanted. Its only suggested that you use a 30 cal or bigger on the zama hunt. Seen one fold from a well placed 150grain power point out of an old 06'. Kill zones are real low on them. Put it in there and they fall down quick. They aren't bullet proof.
|
02-22-2013, 08:11 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Olds, Alberta, Canukistan.
Posts: 5,413
|
|
I'd use a good bonded bullet, the heavier the weight the better. Winchester XP3's or TTSX's would be my choice.
__________________
Don't argue with a fool, he'll bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.
Life Member of:
Wild Sheep Foundation Alberta
Wild Sheep Foundation
NRA
|
02-22-2013, 08:47 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 1,467
|
|
I wouldn't risk using a lower calibre just to say I took it with one.
Be proud of how you hunt and that you were ethical.
Saying you killed a bear with a 22 doesn't get you respect. It makes you look like the ass you would be.
Granted a 270 wsm is far from a 22, I would focus on hunting the animal, correct shot placement and making sure none of it goes to waste. Don't pick your calibre just for your ego.
|
02-22-2013, 08:53 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vermilion ab
Posts: 2,289
|
|
Has to be factory ammo BB? I would look at the 150 gr PT first, the 140 AB or Tsx next. If you get a chance at a behind the ear shot, obviously at a closer range take it . I shot mine with a 7mm RM 160 gr PT heart shot , there is a lot if blood in them beasts. He tipped over after a bit though , I wanted to keep skull intact I shoulda put one behind his ear.
__________________
Bring on the Anarchy already !
|
02-22-2013, 09:04 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 190
|
|
I'd rather own a wood buffalo.
__________________
Join the CCFR and the CSSA: For the price of two bricks of .22, you can hurl a couple of figurative bricks through a window in Ottawa, with your message attached!
|
02-22-2013, 09:04 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gitrdun
The first 2, I took aim for what I figured would be a neck shot, much as I did for any ungulate as elk, deer or moose. But the thick cape obviously hides the small kill zone. The next two were shot between the eyes, full frontal. I have a skull here on my wall. In a hunting scenario, I would study the anatomy much as you suggest.
|
Well Git, you have more experience with bison than most here, but given your shot placement was between the eyes with the two smaller rounds, we still don't know whether a sub-.300 cal round is suitable for, say, a 150 yard shot in the boiler room that many of us would take.
Anyone else here killed a bison with something less than a .300 mag? How did it go?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:54 PM.
|