Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-21-2013, 01:32 PM
buckbrushoutdoors's Avatar
buckbrushoutdoors buckbrushoutdoors is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fort Saskatchewan
Posts: 3,698
Default Thoughts on the 270wsm vs wood buffalo

based on factory ammo, what do you think the best choice for a buffalo would be? I would like to use my 270 wsm just to say I killed a buff with one. I do have a 300win mag but I truly believe the 270wsm would be up to the challenge. What are your guys thoughts on bullet selection with factory ammo. I know most would say the one that groups the tightest but in all honestey minute of buffalo is quite large.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-21-2013, 01:39 PM
Okotokian's Avatar
Okotokian Okotokian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
Default

If I had both and shot both comfortably I'd use the .300. I see no reason to take any sort of risk with an animal, no matter how small, simply to say that I did it. Now if you didn't have the .300 perhaps the .270 would be good. I've never shot the .270wsm so can't say for sure, but the printed ballistics look impressive. Been considering buying one. I wouldn't use my .270WIN however.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-21-2013, 02:49 PM
Ice Fishing Maniac's Avatar
Ice Fishing Maniac Ice Fishing Maniac is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,171
Default

IF you used your 270WSM, factory Winchecter Supreme 150gr XP3's get my vote. Next would be 140gr TSX's if available.

I love 140gr Accubonds in my 270WSM (reloads but did use the WS factory rounds) but I think the tough hide of a buffalo and not be the best. I could be wrong b/c I have had awesome results with this caliber and bullet combo on elk/moose/etc.

If using 300WM, factory WS 180gr XP3's or the AB's get my vote. If you reloaded, 200gr AB's or TTSX's.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-21-2013, 02:53 PM
buckbrushoutdoors's Avatar
buckbrushoutdoors buckbrushoutdoors is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fort Saskatchewan
Posts: 3,698
Default

Ive got a few boxes of a 140gr tsx that i know will do the job. I seen a 110gr ttsx travel through 4' of moose at 80 yards this fall. Im sure the 140's will be plenty but I wouldnt mind trying the 150gr xp3s
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-21-2013, 03:06 PM
L.O.S.T.Arrow's Avatar
L.O.S.T.Arrow L.O.S.T.Arrow is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Wainwright
Posts: 4,499
Default

Personally I would go with the .300 I have seen them take clips of 180 gr 30-06 to the bolier room and not even flinch...still went down but took em...
not saying it cant be done but...if a wood buffalos tail is up they are either discharging or chargeing...and it seems their tail is always up...

Mine was huge F&W thought around 2600 lbs

Neil
__________________
APA AIR
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-21-2013, 03:16 PM
Woodbeef Woodbeef is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Brooks
Posts: 209
Default

If you hit the soft spot a little behind the lower part of the ear either will work fine.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-21-2013, 03:37 PM
Weatherbyguy
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I heard there was a minimum if 180 grain allowed for buffalo?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-21-2013, 05:08 PM
flyguyd's Avatar
flyguyd flyguyd is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 3,661
Default

If i ever get drawn i think ill just take the 338wm and 250gr grandslams and call her good.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-21-2013, 05:41 PM
Ultimate Predator Ultimate Predator is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 867
Default

Wouldnt even think twice about using my bow 270 wsm will have no problem
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-21-2013, 05:50 PM
seymourpats seymourpats is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 129
Default

I may be mistaken, but I thought it was .30 caliber minimum? Maybe that was only b.c.?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-21-2013, 05:54 PM
rancho-non-relaxo rancho-non-relaxo is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 56
Default

Use the 300 as it has the proper grain bullets to get the job done. Remember buffalo have thick hides, massive bones and a lot of muscle to get through before you hit the vitals. A 30 caliber rifle should probably be considered the min size you would want to use. Remember you are not putting down a cow and shooting it in the head at 6 feet. This is a hunting scenaro where anything could happen and you might need the bigger gun to get things done.
Good luck with what ever you choose.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-21-2013, 05:55 PM
NBFK NBFK is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: In The Zone.......
Posts: 1,686
Default

The only way a 270wsm will kill a bison is with an accubond. When are we going?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-21-2013, 06:11 PM
BackPackHunter BackPackHunter is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,345
Default

Nosler Accubond would be my pick too,

http://www.nosler.com/Ammunition/Trophy-Grade.aspx
__________________
.....Only here for buy n sell....
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-21-2013, 06:44 PM
Grizzly Adams's Avatar
Grizzly Adams Grizzly Adams is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 21,399
Default

Let's see now. Bull can weigh around 1500 lbs, chest about 3 ft. across. The .270 will be staying home when my turn comes and I'll be wiping the dust off the .338.


Grizz
__________________
"Indeed, no human being has yet lived under conditions which, considering the prevailing climates of the past, can be regarded as normal."
John E. Pfeiffer The Emergence of Man
written in 1969
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-21-2013, 07:36 PM
gitrdun gitrdun is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: High River, AB
Posts: 10,788
Default

Never mind caliber, that isn't the most concerning thought. Shot placement more than most animals is. I have shot bison with a. 338wm and a .375h&h with poor results due to being fooled by that thick neck of hair. Study the construction of this animal and then a well placed 270wsm will do the job. You cannot replace good shot placement by simply upping bullet diameter. A poorly placec shot on bison makes no difference no matter how big or fast your bullet is. They are extremely hardy, and that big mane can cause confusion as to where to put it.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-21-2013, 07:39 PM
gitrdun gitrdun is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: High River, AB
Posts: 10,788
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grizzly Adams View Post
Let's see now. Bull can weigh around 1500 lbs, chest about 3 ft. across. The .270 will be staying home when my turn comes and I'll be wiping the dust off the .338.


Grizz
Awesome, how many have you dropped with a single shot or ANY for that matter?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-21-2013, 08:11 PM
bdub's Avatar
bdub bdub is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,713
Default

I am sure it would work fine if the shot and animal position is good. I think a bigger is better type of thinking would apply here if shot angle etc. is less than ideal. my thinking is it it would be the perfect excuse to buy a .375hh.
__________________
There are some who can live without wild things, and some who cannot. Aldo Leopold
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-21-2013, 08:25 PM
gitrdun gitrdun is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: High River, AB
Posts: 10,788
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bdub View Post
I am sure it would work fine if the shot and animal position is good. I think a bigger is better type of thinking would apply here if shot angle etc. is less than ideal. my thinking is it it would be the perfect excuse to buy a .375hh.
No, I failed to one shot kill the first 2 with .338wm and .375ouch. The 3rd one dropped stone cold dead to the almighty. ...................7mm-08. Ok, by that time, I had gained a wee bit of experience. My 4th, dropped to the almighty "swede". Not to confuse anyone, these were cull kills, not bonafide hunts....
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-21-2013, 08:42 PM
bdub's Avatar
bdub bdub is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,713
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gitrdun View Post
No, I failed to one shot kill the first 2 with .338wm and .375ouch. The 3rd one dropped stone cold dead to the almighty. ...................7mm-08. Ok, by that time, I had gained a wee bit of experience. My 4th, dropped to the almighty "swede". Not to confuse anyone, these were cull kills, not bonafide hunts....
Where did you hit them. Any tricks to bullet placement, they are an odd shaped animal and I have never really studied there anatomy. I have ran into a few of them in the Sikkani river country. Pretty intimidating animal when you walk into them in the bush.
__________________
There are some who can live without wild things, and some who cannot. Aldo Leopold
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-21-2013, 09:00 PM
gitrdun gitrdun is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: High River, AB
Posts: 10,788
Default

The first 2, I took aim for what I figured would be a neck shot, much as I did for any ungulate as elk, deer or moose. But the thick cape obviously hides the small kill zone. The next two were shot between the eyes, full frontal. I have a skull here on my wall. In a hunting scenario, I would study the anatomy much as you suggest.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 02-21-2013, 09:11 PM
twofifty twofifty is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: S.E. British Columbia
Posts: 4,579
Default

fyi, in BC the regs state that:

"ammunition to hunt bison must be constructed with a 175 grain or larger bullet, which retains 2,712 joules (2000 ft lbs) or more energy at 100 m."
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-21-2013, 10:03 PM
Traps Traps is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,253
Default

Don't bother with accubonds, 140tsx is the only choice
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-21-2013, 10:37 PM
Big Daddy Badger Big Daddy Badger is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 12,558
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weatherbyguy View Post
I heard there was a minimum if 180 grain allowed for buffalo?
Seems like I recall seeing that somewhere as well.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-21-2013, 10:39 PM
Big Daddy Badger Big Daddy Badger is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 12,558
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by twofifty View Post
fyi, in BC the regs state that:

"ammunition to hunt bison must be constructed with a 175 grain or larger bullet, which retains 2,712 joules (2000 ft lbs) or more energy at 100 m."
Thats OK... Alberta bison are way easier to kill than BC bison

That must be where I read that though.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-22-2013, 08:02 AM
NBFK NBFK is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: In The Zone.......
Posts: 1,686
Default

243s are legal for alberta bison in zama. The ones east of high level you could use a 22lr if you wanted. Its only suggested that you use a 30 cal or bigger on the zama hunt. Seen one fold from a well placed 150grain power point out of an old 06'. Kill zones are real low on them. Put it in there and they fall down quick. They aren't bullet proof.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-22-2013, 08:11 AM
Ryry4's Avatar
Ryry4 Ryry4 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Olds, Alberta, Canukistan.
Posts: 5,413
Default

I'd use a good bonded bullet, the heavier the weight the better. Winchester XP3's or TTSX's would be my choice.
__________________


Don't argue with a fool, he'll bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.

Life Member of:
Wild Sheep Foundation Alberta
Wild Sheep Foundation
NRA

Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-22-2013, 08:47 AM
1000yards 1000yards is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 1,467
Default

I wouldn't risk using a lower calibre just to say I took it with one.
Be proud of how you hunt and that you were ethical.
Saying you killed a bear with a 22 doesn't get you respect. It makes you look like the ass you would be.

Granted a 270 wsm is far from a 22, I would focus on hunting the animal, correct shot placement and making sure none of it goes to waste. Don't pick your calibre just for your ego.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-22-2013, 08:53 AM
super7mag's Avatar
super7mag super7mag is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vermilion ab
Posts: 2,289
Default

Has to be factory ammo BB? I would look at the 150 gr PT first, the 140 AB or Tsx next. If you get a chance at a behind the ear shot, obviously at a closer range take it . I shot mine with a 7mm RM 160 gr PT heart shot , there is a lot if blood in them beasts. He tipped over after a bit though , I wanted to keep skull intact I shoulda put one behind his ear.
__________________
Bring on the Anarchy already !
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 02-22-2013, 09:04 AM
philthygeezer philthygeezer is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 190
Default

I'd rather own a wood buffalo.
__________________
Join the CCFR and the CSSA: For the price of two bricks of .22, you can hurl a couple of figurative bricks through a window in Ottawa, with your message attached!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 02-22-2013, 09:04 AM
Okotokian's Avatar
Okotokian Okotokian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gitrdun View Post
The first 2, I took aim for what I figured would be a neck shot, much as I did for any ungulate as elk, deer or moose. But the thick cape obviously hides the small kill zone. The next two were shot between the eyes, full frontal. I have a skull here on my wall. In a hunting scenario, I would study the anatomy much as you suggest.
Well Git, you have more experience with bison than most here, but given your shot placement was between the eyes with the two smaller rounds, we still don't know whether a sub-.300 cal round is suitable for, say, a 150 yard shot in the boiler room that many of us would take.

Anyone else here killed a bison with something less than a .300 mag? How did it go?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.