Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-18-2021, 07:23 AM
Dubious Dubious is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,522
Default New 135gr .257 bullets

New product out for the 1/4 bore. https://bergerbullets.com/product/25...hybrid-target/ pretty exciting stuff can’t wait for a hunting variant. With black Jack Berger and hammer bullets there’s starting to be a pretty good selection of heavy 25 cal bullets bringing some excitement back into this classic caliber.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-18-2021, 07:51 AM
Ranger CS Ranger CS is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Pincher Creek
Posts: 921
Default

Interesting, thanks for posting!
__________________
Ranger
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-18-2021, 08:24 AM
JULIUS JULIUS is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 248
Default

Very interesting. This could up the game for my 25-06 but I am not sure I want to mess with my 120 grain nosler load. lol
More options is always good and finding out what these could do should be fun.
Thanks for posting
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-18-2021, 08:44 AM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,130
Default

If you have a rifle built with a fast enough twist, this may be a good option, but most current factory rifles don't have a fast enough twist to stabilize it.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-18-2021, 08:52 AM
Dubious Dubious is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,522
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
If you have a rifle built with a fast enough twist, this may be a good option, but most current factory rifles don't have a fast enough twist to stabilize it.
having a barrel swapped is like changing tires on a truck its not very intrusive and don't cost a lot.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-18-2021, 08:56 AM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,130
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dubious View Post
having a barrel swapped is like changing tires on a truck its not very intrusive and don't cost a lot.
Many people paid less for their rifle, than a replacement barrel costs.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-18-2021, 08:58 AM
Dubious Dubious is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,522
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
Many people paid less for their rifle, than a replacement barrel costs.
those types of people probably won't be shooting a bullet that needs a custom barrel and has to be hand loaded.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-18-2021, 08:59 AM
AB2506's Avatar
AB2506 AB2506 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary AB
Posts: 2,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
If you have a rifle built with a fast enough twist, this may be a good option, but most current factory rifles don't have a fast enough twist to stabilize it.
Beat me to it.

To the OP and others;

If you have a fast enough twist barrel to stabilize it, can you explain how it increases the effectiveness of, let's say a 25-06, over 450yds? I've never found a good 115gr or 120gr bullet lacking at those ranges on deer and antelope.

If the barrel twist is fast enough, it (135gr Berger) would be easier to make the 25-06 a long range target competitor with the Creedmoor.

The developers of these cartridges knew a thing or two about ballistics, even if they didn't have computers 100 years ago.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-18-2021, 08:59 AM
huntwat huntwat is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,153
Default

If I need heavier bullets, I’ll shoot my 30-06.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-18-2021, 10:11 AM
Dubious Dubious is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,522
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AB2506 View Post
Beat me to it.

To the OP and others;

If you have a fast enough twist barrel to stabilize it, can you explain how it increases the effectiveness of, let's say a 25-06, over 450yds? I've never found a good 115gr or 120gr bullet lacking at those ranges on deer and antelope.

If the barrel twist is fast enough, it (135gr Berger) would be easier to make the 25-06 a long range target competitor with the Creedmoor.

The developers of these cartridges knew a thing or two about ballistics, even if they didn't have computers 100 years ago.
does it need to increase the effectiveness? some people like different things if it was all about "effectiveness" everyone would shoot the exact same bullet in the exact same cartridge and manufactures wouldn't produce anything else, im not trying to change anyones mind here its a new interesting product on the market for PRS focused on 25-06 and 25 creed I would enjoy a barrel set up for target shooting and hunting in a heaver bullet in 25 cal.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-18-2021, 11:10 AM
no-regard's Avatar
no-regard no-regard is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 679
Default

Great news for sure. I haven't shot my .25-06 for a few years but it has been top of mind lately. Maybe I can get it burned out and rebarelled, likely take awhile but it will be fun.

With Berger getting on board I think we could expect to see other big manufacturers offering more options as well.

Will a fast twist barrel still stabilize the lighter/shorter bullets?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-18-2021, 11:45 AM
Dubious Dubious is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,522
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by no-regard View Post
Great news for sure. I haven't shot my .25-06 for a few years but it has been top of mind lately. Maybe I can get it burned out and rebarelled, likely take awhile but it will be fun.

With Berger getting on board I think we could expect to see other big manufacturers offering more options as well.

Will a fast twist barrel still stabilize the lighter/shorter bullets?
now that an intersection question here's what I have found,

I have had a 1-8 in mind for the 25 for some time now I emailed Sierra about there 70 gr blitsking hoping to find out if the bullets would just blow apart from the high rpm of the faster twist, sierras response was "1-8 twist will be fine", I also emailed Carson at Lilja barrels he recommended a 1-7 OR 1-8 for the 131 ace and recommended a 1-12 for the 70 gr sierras and a 1-10 for 100 gr bullets he also said it wouldn't be optimal to have one barrel cover the entire spectrum. this is why with burger now on board (hopefully hornady to follow) it would be nice to see a hunting bullet come out in the 130 gr weight for the 25cals. guess ill just have to order a Lilja barrel and try it out and wait for more stuff to come on the market from major manufactures.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-18-2021, 11:46 AM
Ranger CS Ranger CS is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Pincher Creek
Posts: 921
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
Many people paid less for their rifle, than a replacement barrel costs.
What would be an average cost of a barrel replacement be nowadays?
I think it would be reasonable to predict some of the major manufactures will offer factory rifles with faster twist rifling will they not?
__________________
Ranger
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-18-2021, 11:52 AM
no-regard's Avatar
no-regard no-regard is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 679
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dubious View Post
now that an intersection question here's what I have found,

I have had a 1-8 in mind for the 25 for some time now I emailed Sierra about there 70 gr blitsking hoping to find out if the bullets would just blow apart from the high rpm of the faster twist, sierras response was "1-8 twist will be fine", I also emailed Carson at Lilja barrels he recommended a 1-7 OR 1-8 for the 131 ace and recommended a 1-12 for the 70 gr sierras and a 1-10 for 100 gr bullets he also said it wouldn't be optimal to have one barrel cover the entire spectrum. this is why with burger now on board (hopefully hornady to follow) it would be nice to see a hunting bullet come out in the 130 gr weight for the 25cals. guess ill just have to order a Lilja barrel and try it out and wait for more stuff to come on the market from major manufactures.
This is what I thought. Thanks for the info.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-18-2021, 01:29 PM
duceman duceman is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: south of calgary
Posts: 1,831
Default

fyi; heavy .257 bullets have been available for at least 5 years; made here in alberta. my limited testing with 135’s and 140’s from chinchaga bullets showed excellent results.
i’m burning up my supply of 115 bergers then getting more serious with dale’s bullets in my f-gun with 8 twist.
__________________
220swifty

1. People who list their arguments in bullets points or numerical order generally come off as condescending pecker heads.

2. #1 is true.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-18-2021, 01:46 PM
Dean2's Avatar
Dean2 Dean2 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Near Edmonton
Posts: 15,049
Default

This whole heavy for calibre bullet trend is getting carried way too far. Next thing you know you will need a 1:3 twist to stabilise them. My view, move up a calibre if you want to shoot heavier bullets.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-19-2021, 12:37 PM
eric2381 eric2381 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean2 View Post
This whole heavy for calibre bullet trend is getting carried way too far. Next thing you know you will need a 1:3 twist to stabilise them. My view, move up a calibre if you want to shoot heavier bullets.


I agree. I’m going the opposite way. Instead of soft heavy long and slow bullets, I’m going to lighter, much faster, deep penetrating bullets. Barnes Ttsx. In the case of 25 cal, I love the 80gr Ttsx moving at 3875fps out of my 25-06 AI. 135gr bullets and a special rifle to shoot them? Plus being temperamental to get shooting well?? No thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-19-2021, 03:59 PM
wayne wayne is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 218
Default

With the biggest player in the "heavy for caliber bullet trend" being Winchester/Browning's 6.8 Western cartridge it is not too much of a stretch to imagine a 258 Western coming down the pipe too.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-19-2021, 04:21 PM
waldedw's Avatar
waldedw waldedw is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Lloydminster
Posts: 4,506
Default

It would be sweet out of my 257 WM but a 1 in 10 twist won't cut it and I'm not rebarreling my first light just so I can shoot a heavier bullet, I'll just shoot my 6.5 PRC if I need more bullet.
__________________
The problem we have today is that the people who work for a living are outnumbered by the people who vote for a living.

We were all born ignorant but one must work very hard to remain that way.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-19-2021, 04:43 PM
Jerry D's Avatar
Jerry D Jerry D is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,405
Default

Soon we’ll be shooting javelin bullets!
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 01-19-2021, 08:19 PM
Bearsden Bearsden is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 50
Default


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry D View Post
Soon we’ll be shooting javelin bullets!
The all new 6.5 199 grain Javelin!! Coming soon
__________________
It's hard to have fun in a time like this but I do my best
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-20-2021, 07:33 AM
duceman duceman is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: south of calgary
Posts: 1,831
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eric2381 View Post
I agree. I’m going the opposite way. Instead of soft heavy long and slow bullets, I’m going to lighter, much faster, deep penetrating bullets. Barnes Ttsx. In the case of 25 cal, I love the 80gr Ttsx moving at 3875fps out of my 25-06 AI. 135gr bullets and a special rifle to shoot them? Plus being temperamental to get shooting well?? No thanks.
check your performance at 900m with the 80 ttsx............. it's ok to accept the fact that not everyone is strictly a 300 yd 'freezer filler'
__________________
220swifty

1. People who list their arguments in bullets points or numerical order generally come off as condescending pecker heads.

2. #1 is true.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-20-2021, 09:39 AM
eric2381 eric2381 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,484
Default

How many animals do you kill at 900yds with a 25 cal? I’ve one shot killed a few deer and an antelope at 400yds. And that’s good enough for me. Hold right on em and shoot.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-20-2021, 09:51 AM
eric2381 eric2381 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,484
Default

But yes, for sure, more bullets are shot at targets than at game. And for targets this new bullet might be just the right thing for some people. Just not me.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-20-2021, 09:57 AM
Dean2's Avatar
Dean2 Dean2 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Near Edmonton
Posts: 15,049
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eric2381 View Post
How many animals do you kill at 900yds with a 25 cal? I’ve one shot killed a few deer and an antelope at 400yds. And that’s good enough for me. Hold right on em and shoot.

I agree, pop guns at 1000 yards is a bad idea. You want to hunt at long range, learn to shoot a 300 RUM, 28 Nosler or 338 Lapua. If you can't shoot those well, stick to 700 yards or less.


Your point abbout target guns is a good one. If the B.C. is high enough, and depending on the velocity trade off, it might make a decent target round but I would think the 6.5s with all the bullet choices available for them would be a far easier row to hoe.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-22-2021, 04:35 AM
Jerry D's Avatar
Jerry D Jerry D is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,405
Default

On a hunting note, Sierra has a 110gr tipped game king. Excited to try it due to price point and its recommendations for medium game in my .25-06. I’ve shot a number with the .110 gr accubond and don’t see a reason to change though.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-22-2021, 11:34 AM
Stinky Coyote Stinky Coyote is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,189
Default

This would get a lot more interesting at 150gr, g1 bc likely approach .8 and sd would then be .324 (similar to a 159 gr 6.5mm at .326)

so the 135 i don't think would make a commercial success, niche maybe

a proper roll out(rifles/ammo/bullets) of anything approaching .325 sd and mid .7 up to .8 g1 bc will have a chance of long standing success...imo

especially if recoil energy in a 'fits most shooters' range
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-22-2021, 09:12 PM
Faststeel Faststeel is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Alberta
Posts: 2,580
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dubious View Post
those types of people probably won't be shooting a bullet that needs a custom barrel and has to be hand loaded.
In 25 caliber
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-22-2021, 09:52 PM
Dubious Dubious is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,522
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Faststeel View Post
In 25 caliber
Truth. 😂

I dont expect to see anything in 150 gr in 25 cal as dean mentioned above rate of twist does become silly and your going to lose out on the lighter end of the spectrum. I’ve always planned for a rebarrel for the 131 black Jack bullet this new bullet is just the icing on the cake for me. My hope for a heavy hunting bullet isn’t to shoot game at extended distances it’s to not have to have to spin on a second barrel every fall. My current set up in the rifle has been 100 gr bullets for big game and 70gr for varmints that diet of 70gr ammo on the gopher fields has expedited my need for a new barrel.

25 cal will always be a cult classic I dont think it’ll become a bread and butter hunting or target shooting caliber It’s not the only caliber I run for that reason.

Last edited by Dubious; 01-22-2021 at 10:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.