Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-23-2017, 08:15 PM
shooter12 shooter12 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 509
Default 30-06 for long range elk moose

Hello guys!
Was wondering if anyone had experience using 30-06 to bring down big animals like elk and moose at extended ranges.
By extended I mean 600-1000 yards .
What bullets did you use ?
What was your scope ?
I am familiar with 300 mags performance well enough .

But what about 30-06?
Is it up to the task or I should throw it out of my head and go back to 300 mags?

Thanks in advance.
S12
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-23-2017, 08:39 PM
Smokinyotes Smokinyotes is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: onoway, Ab
Posts: 6,995
Default

Do you regularly shoot the 30-06 out to a 1000 yards?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-23-2017, 08:42 PM
Kurt505 Kurt505 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Communist state
Posts: 13,245
Default

I think it's possible, but I think there are better calibers for an 06' case.

If you're going to use a 30 caliber in an 06' case I'd suggest going with a high BC bullet to deliver as much energy down range as possible, something in the 200-220 grain area.

If 600-1000yds is going to be the norm and not the acception, I'd stick to magnums. Jmho.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-23-2017, 08:50 PM
dogslayer403's Avatar
dogslayer403 dogslayer403 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Rocky Mt. House
Posts: 1,829
Default

178g eld-x good balance between BC and velocity and it will get you there probably a better choice in the 06 case over the 200+g save them for the magnums
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-23-2017, 09:18 PM
abbgdr abbgdr is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: near Drumheller, Alberta
Posts: 272
Default

As great as the '06 is, it really isn't in the conversation when it comes to a designated long range elk and moose round. The 340 Weatherby has been king of that hill since the 60's.. of course now days it shares that title with several other 338 "ultra' magnums
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-23-2017, 09:21 PM
Homesteader's Avatar
Homesteader Homesteader is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: West of Edmonton
Posts: 2,287
Default

I doubt anyone has experience with bringing down big animals at 600+ with an 06. Hardly anyone will have experience with far better cartridge choices. I've done a bit of shooting at these distances, and I've learned one thing, I'd never attempt a shot on a game animal at those distances. YMMV, good luck, and choose a better round.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-23-2017, 09:26 PM
DiabeticKripple's Avatar
DiabeticKripple DiabeticKripple is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Blackfalds
Posts: 6,951
Default

Wouldn’t it be a more ethical choice to try and get closer? If you can shoot accurately that far then fine, but lots of guys don’t have that capability.
__________________
Trudeau and Biden sit to pee
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-23-2017, 09:34 PM
Dubious Dubious is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,522
Default

What a tuff question hitting the nerves of fair chase and hunting ethics, the thing of it is is this 30-06 up to the task and do you have the equipment and the experience to make a first round kill hit at 1000 yards. 1000 yards is a long ways and if you do have the experience and the equipment to make that shot in varying wind conditions and elevation then you won’t be using a 06 as there’s are many calibers better suited to delivering 1000ftlbs of energy some people say is the minimum for big game at extended ranges. I’ve custom built my 300 wm for long range shots and the truth of it is since I did I haven taken any game more than 150 m but my long range game on paper targets is really good. If your sitting on a 300 I would pick that up and forget about the 06 it’s the better choice of the 2. If your not sitting on a wm I would look at different calibers as there are far better choices for delivering energy at those ranges.

Last edited by Dubious; 10-23-2017 at 09:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-23-2017, 09:36 PM
Ken3134 Ken3134 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 280
Default Really?

Is this something you really expect to try out? The odds of being able to compensate for the bullet drop and wind on a target that far, and accurately hit a vital area is beyond low.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-23-2017, 09:36 PM
Andrzej's Avatar
Andrzej Andrzej is offline
Gone Hunting
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,708
Default

688 yards cow Elk 243 winch...Why not 30-06 ???

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hY0w1c-gf18
__________________
From Wikipedia
"No safe threshold for lead exposure has been discovered—that is, there is no known amount of lead that is too small to cause the body harm."

150 TTSX vs Goat-WOW
http://youtu.be/37JwmSOQ3pY
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-23-2017, 09:42 PM
Ken3134 Ken3134 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 280
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrzej View Post
688 yards cow Elk 243 winch...Why not 30-06 ???

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hY0w1c-gf18
There is also a guy on YouTube who killed a grizzly bear with a slingshot. He sells them as well.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-23-2017, 09:42 PM
shooter12 shooter12 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 509
Default

I hear you dogslayer403 about 178 eldx.
And I know that there are better choices Kurt 505.

Homesteder please don't brake my hope
It should be some one here who did it , and I really want to know how it was done with 30-06 and what to expect in the field
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-23-2017, 09:44 PM
spoiledsaskhunter spoiledsaskhunter is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrzej View Post
688 yards cow Elk 243 winch...Why not 30-06 ???

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hY0w1c-gf18
look at the way the wind is blowing her vest in that elk shot......would anyone here try that shot in the wind and say they really thought they could pull it off?.....guess even a blind pig finds a mushroom once in a while.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-23-2017, 09:45 PM
abbgdr abbgdr is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: near Drumheller, Alberta
Posts: 272
Default

Ya,, 600-1000 yd shots on game is a bit of a fools game unless you've spent a bunch of money on the tools and the training to be able to read the conditions and can make clean kill shots every time,, otherwise you better plan on getting good at tracking wounded game,, or making excuses
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-23-2017, 09:47 PM
shooter12 shooter12 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 509
Default

Sorry , forget to mention that practicing at those distances is not un issue.
Interested in the real field results..
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-23-2017, 09:56 PM
CMichaud's Avatar
CMichaud CMichaud is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Beijing, Canada
Posts: 1,470
Default

FWIW...from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longes...d_sniper_kills

The science of long-range sniping came to fruition in the Vietnam War. Carlos Hathcock held the record from 1967 to 2002 at 2,286 m (2,500 yd). He recorded 93 official kills. After returning to the U.S., Hathcock helped to establish the Marine Corps Scout Sniper School at Quantico, Virginia

While not on the list due to the range being less than the minimum distance used to compile it, Hathcock's second-longest confirmed kill was 1200 yards (1097 m) using a "standard" USMC sniper rifle chambered in .30-06 Springfield. At the time of Hathcock's service, snipers had essentially been eliminated from the USMC, and its sniper rifles were a hodgepodge mix of commercial Remington 700 and Winchester Model 70 rifles chambered for multiple cartridges. The major challenge for Hathcock and other scout-snipers was improving the performance and reliability of their rifles and ammunition.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-23-2017, 10:06 PM
abbgdr abbgdr is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: near Drumheller, Alberta
Posts: 272
Default

If your sold on using the '06 take the time to dial it in and report back on how it goes,, I'm sure it can be done even though it begs the question why when there are so many better options. Probably best not to expect to get spine shoots every time like the gal with the 243
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-23-2017, 10:09 PM
petew petew is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Alberta
Posts: 2,824
Default

if you can't get closer than 1000 yards fishing might be a better hobby.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-23-2017, 10:32 PM
260 Rem 260 Rem is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: East Central Alberta
Posts: 8,315
Default

The long range question is just math...so any 30 caliber bullet with sufficient energy and composition will be adequate regardless of whether it leaves the muzzle of a 30-06 or 300 WM...assuming proper placement.
I suspect those answering the question posed in the OP with personal experience will be limited to bang-flop kills, and may come up a bit short on the “gut shot mine at 800 yards, good blood trail, found him a day later about 2Kms from where I hit him....”
__________________
Old Guys Rule
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-23-2017, 10:50 PM
shooter12 shooter12 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 509
Default

The long range question is just math...so any 30 caliber bullet with sufficient energy and composition will be adequate regardless of whether it leaves the muzzle of a 30-06 or 300 WM...assuming proper placement.

I think exactly the same way.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 10-23-2017, 11:23 PM
addictedfisherman's Avatar
addictedfisherman addictedfisherman is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 271
Default

I've done lots of long range shooting and the 30-06 will shoot out to 1000 yds without an issue. Here's where it gets tricky, lets say you have a reliably accurate rifle that will shoot 1 Minute of angle every time you hit the range. That's 1.047" at 100yds. If we extrapolate that to 1000 yards the best your rifle can do is 10.47" group. Now that wont account for wind changes, humidity or elevation changes or any one of the dozen factors that affect the shooter, ammunition, rifle and bullet.

It is 100% possible to luck into a clean kill shot at that distance. The odds however are stacked against you. Do some shooting see if you can hit consistently at the distances you want to hunt and make up your own mind.

As for bullet choice you will want something that has a high B.C. and still comes out at a decent speed. play around with trajectory calculators to see which combination of weight and BC will give you the most usable cartridge.

Good luck.
__________________
“We are measured more as hunters by the things we choose not to shoot, than by those that we do.”
Keith McCafferty
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-24-2017, 05:51 AM
58thecat's Avatar
58thecat 58thecat is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: At the end of the Thirsty Beaver Trail, Pinsky lake, Alberta.
Posts: 24,620
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurt505 View Post
I think it's possible, but I think there are better calibers for an 06' case.

If you're going to use a 30 caliber in an 06' case I'd suggest going with a high BC bullet to deliver as much energy down range as possible, something in the 200-220 grain area.

If 600-1000yds is going to be the norm and not the acception, I'd stick to magnums. Jmho.
I'd take that 06 for a walk and get closer, close the gap to 300yards and send a 165gr pill...to the Op I would seriously look into this type of hunting and understand that they never show the misses, wounded animals etc, carry a magnum yabadaba dooo rifle cartridge but close the gap...I have sat too many a time to here shots in the distance just to see a animal and a leg flopping running.
Chatted with a group once and man the shooter had a set up, bipod, huge scope with knobs all over the place, long barrel and during the conversation he mentions ranged 670, shot in front, adjusted, leg shot...my response was with this type of terrain and the wind direction you could have closed the gap to 100 yards...hunting or shooting?
__________________

Be careful when you follow the masses, sometimes the "M" is silent...
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-24-2017, 05:55 AM
58thecat's Avatar
58thecat 58thecat is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: At the end of the Thirsty Beaver Trail, Pinsky lake, Alberta.
Posts: 24,620
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CMichaud View Post
FWIW...from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longes...d_sniper_kills

The science of long-range sniping came to fruition in the Vietnam War. Carlos Hathcock held the record from 1967 to 2002 at 2,286 m (2,500 yd). He recorded 93 official kills. After returning to the U.S., Hathcock helped to establish the Marine Corps Scout Sniper School at Quantico, Virginia

While not on the list due to the range being less than the minimum distance used to compile it, Hathcock's second-longest confirmed kill was 1200 yards (1097 m) using a "standard" USMC sniper rifle chambered in .30-06 Springfield. At the time of Hathcock's service, snipers had essentially been eliminated from the USMC, and its sniper rifles were a hodgepodge mix of commercial Remington 700 and Winchester Model 70 rifles chambered for multiple cartridges. The major challenge for Hathcock and other scout-snipers was improving the performance and reliability of their rifles and ammunition.
And if you hit the enemy in the shin who cared, takes a minimum of one other soldier to drag the wounded around and others to take care of him. For all the kill shots as the distance opened the misses and wounded enemy soldiers spiked but like I said who cares...game animals deserve a clean humane one shot kill.
__________________

Be careful when you follow the masses, sometimes the "M" is silent...
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-24-2017, 06:24 AM
cody j cody j is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sunset House
Posts: 1,256
Default

That 2500 yd shot was actually done with a 50 cal machine gun with a scope mounted on it.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-24-2017, 06:58 AM
pat brennan pat brennan is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 77
Default shooting big game animals at 600-1000 yards

Can it be done, answer is yes. Should it be done, ethical answer is no (stunt shooters aside). A person might be capable if they are an accomplished F class shooter (or equivalent) and have the specialized equipment to do it, but the animal deserves much better than quite possibly/probably a marginal hit at extended range.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-24-2017, 07:24 AM
Don_Parsons Don_Parsons is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 1,827
Default

Anything is possible with most legal to harvest cartrages.

I agree that we never get to see the wounded critter shots that elude the capture of the harvester as they either suffer a disabilitating injury for as long as they are alive or parish some time after that. Of course this is only a thought of what could play out. The other end of the spectrum is that the harvest is successful.

Can a 30/06 reach out to harvest at distance, yes.
Is the rifle, intended cartrage up for the task, along with the shooter.

What's at play, and all the variables that "could" play out in this.

One might get good groups down range off the shooting bench, pron, or free hand at X distance,,, would this play out the same in field.

Lots to consider I'm thinking, but each to their own.

Many of us know our limits, and each of us benefit with how we "choose" to go after our pray.

Sorry I couldn't give you a strait up call on if it can be done or could be.

The "if and could" are 2 different categories, we would know at that moment once the trigger is pulled in what order we might want to place them.

I'm Harvesting game this year with a 30/06.
The rifle and cartrage have their limits along with me the shooter.
I say this in the heat of the moment. Will the critter allow its self for the taking,,, and I'm I able to reep the rewards with a clean and ethical harvest.

Placing a cap on distance, terrain, weather conditions and mental state of mind and frame.

This is ever changing from day to day as each of us balance it out in the limited count of seconds or longer if a shot presents its self.

Don as I hope the closer I get the better the odds are stacked in my favour.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-24-2017, 07:42 AM
dogslayer403's Avatar
dogslayer403 dogslayer403 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Rocky Mt. House
Posts: 1,829
Default

No where in the op did he ask who thought it was ethical to shoot that far only if the 30-06 is capable, which it is now for those who enjoy long range practice its not so you can plan to shoot tht far every time its so if you have no other option you have put in the foot work to take your animal instead of passing it up because of your lack of confidence in yourself and rifle.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-24-2017, 07:46 AM
Salavee Salavee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Parkland County, AB
Posts: 4,257
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shooter12 View Post
Hello guys!
Was wondering if anyone had experience using 30-06 to bring down big animals like elk and moose at extended ranges.
By extended I mean 600-1000 yards .
What bullets did you use ?
What was your scope ?
I am familiar with 300 mags performance well enough .

But what about 30-06?
Is it up to the task or I should throw it out of my head and go back to 300 mags?

Thanks in advance.
S12
Seriously .. if you have to ask that question you should consider throwing both out of your head and watch a little more TV. Sooner or later the lights will come on.
Try putting 5 consecutive shots on a 5" gong at 500 yds with your hunting rifle ..away from the bench. Once accomplished, then put one shot in a 12 " gong @ 1000 yds. and count the empty cases. You will know when you're ready to try it on Game.
__________________
When applied by competent people with the right intent, common sense goes a long way.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-24-2017, 07:49 AM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cody j View Post
That 2500 yd shot was actually done with a 50 cal machine gun with a scope mounted on it.
IIRC it was also transit mounted , not hand held.

The 243 kill that was over 600 yards earlier in the thread dropped that elk like it was hit with the hammer of Thor- hardly a
" right behind the shoulder " as was the suggested aiming point given by the spotter.
It looked far more like a spine shot which is dangerously close to a miss or worse, a wounding shot.
A person would have to be an extremely accomplished marksman to be confident AND capable enough to put a round into the kill zone every time at distances greater than 600 yards especially in an area where the wind is a big factor due to constant changes.

It can be done of course, I don't know of a lot of people capable of doing it that would try it, especially with a sporter weight '06- and I know more than a few people capable of doing it
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-24-2017, 07:54 AM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,160
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Salavee View Post
Seriously .. if you have to ask that question you should consider throwing both out of your head and watch a little more TV. Sooner or later the lights will come on.
Try putting 5 consecutive shots on a 5" gong at 500 yds with your hunting rifle ..away from the bench. Once accomplished, then put one shot in a 12 " gong @ 1000 yds. and count the empty cases. You will know when you're ready to try it on Game.
Unfortunately, many people that attempt those long shots on game, don't even bother practicing at 1000 yards , and they have no idea what their capabilities even are. I watched one character at the range sight in his 270 with a Huskemaw scope at 25 yards, and then declare to his friend that he was ready to hunt out to 800 yards. His friend asked if he was going to shoot farther, and his reply was that it would on;y be a waste of time and money, because he could calculate the point of impact out to 800 yards using the velocity listed on the ammunition box. He was shooting factory loads, and didn't even have a chronograph .
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.