Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-13-2019, 11:57 AM
KevDawg KevDawg is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Calgary
Posts: 23
Default Tikka's Really that good?

I've been researching the hell out of new rifles.
My budget is under $2000
I've come down to a Tikka t3x, Browning Hells Canyon or Weatherby Vangurard.

Pretty much every article or forum post I read has complaint in some way about the Browning and Weatherby but no one seems to have a bad thing to say about the Tikka.


Are Tikka's really that good?
Is it worth the extra $$ to go up to a Sako?

Thanks in advance for your opinions & input.
__________________
Be kind to one another
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-13-2019, 12:01 PM
GloatingKitten GloatingKitten is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 5
Default

Go with the Tikka you won't be let down
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-13-2019, 12:30 PM
Redneck Tommy Redneck Tommy is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 334
Default

They only have one action length long and the magazine sticks out my biggest dislikes about them.
__________________
Guns have only two enemies; rust and politicians.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-13-2019, 12:32 PM
Groundhogger's Avatar
Groundhogger Groundhogger is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Ontario~looking west
Posts: 1,158
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KevDawg View Post
I've been researching the hell out of new rifles.
My budget is under $2000
I've come down to a Tikka t3x, Browning Hells Canyon or Weatherby Vangurard.

Pretty much every article or forum post I read has complaint in some way about the Browning and Weatherby but no one seems to have a bad thing to say about the Tikka.


Are Tikka's really that good?
Is it worth the extra $$ to go up to a Sako?


Thanks in advance for your opinions & input.
^Yes, and probably. I recently sold a very accurate heavy barrel Savage and a Ruger semi auto so that I could get a Tikka T3x Varmint in .204. Zero regrets so far. Sub MOA using factory ammo, I'm now working up loads. The trigger on mine was a little heavy even after dialing it all the way down...so I replaced the trigger spring with a Yo Dave. Easy job/big improvement, about $15 expense. lol The Tikka trigger breaks so cleanly from the factory that an aftermarket/drop-in was no temptation.

I've shot a Sako Varmint in .223, I don't think there is a nicer, factory rifle than that...and I once owned a Cooper. For my needs, I don't believe the extra $ for a SAKO would improve the accuracy OR shooting experience at all. I don't see how it could. No denying the SAKO is superb, but the Tikka is a remarkable gun for the money. I should have made the switch some time ago, but really digging this rifle.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-13-2019, 12:35 PM
270person 270person is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,496
Default

Tikka are good guns. So are Wby. I've owned one Browning but didnt care for it
Junk trigger and more plasticky feel than the other 2.

Look at CZ.
__________________
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by the speed of light squared... ...then you energy.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-13-2019, 12:51 PM
Red Bullets's Avatar
Red Bullets Red Bullets is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: central Alberta
Posts: 12,627
Default

I bought a new Tikka T3 hunter (30-06) and right out of the box it was such a treat to shoot. Mine had a wooden stock. Barely any recoil. Could shoot it all day.
__________________
___________________________________________
This country was started by voyagers whose young lives were swept away by the currents of the rivers for ten cents a day... just for the vanity of the European's beaver hats. ~ Red Bullets
___________________________________________
It is when you walk alone in nature that you discover your strengths and weaknesses. ~ Red Bullets
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-13-2019, 01:06 PM
honker_clonker honker_clonker is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 387
Default

Only gripes about mine are the mag is seemingly a few thou over max length of my 300 win mag bullets so when I shoot, the recoil deforms the tips on my Accubonds and there is no messing around with bullets loaded closer to the lands unless you single load them. I also had crazy poi wandering in the factory stock, all changed with the bell and carlson medalist however. Great shooter now.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-13-2019, 01:25 PM
270person 270person is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,496
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Bullets View Post
I bought a new Tikka T3 hunter (30-06) and right out of the box it was such a treat to shoot. Mine had a wooden stock. Barely any recoil. Could shoot it all day.


Dont hear that about T3's much. Oversll they were pretty brutal on the recoil side. Total junk pad. T3x is much better.

I'd actually say that comparing equivalent cartridges above 270 the T3 was the worst by far for recoil. Short of the old Husky's etc. Browning, Weatherby, Remington and Winchester are much better at mitigating recoil.

Plus you move away from all the plastics. Bolt shroud, trigger guard, etc etc. T3x is much better value for the buck and at 850-925 a very decent buy.
__________________
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by the speed of light squared... ...then you energy.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-13-2019, 01:41 PM
lone wolf's Avatar
lone wolf lone wolf is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Medicine Hat
Posts: 3,214
Default

I have had a lot of Tikkas over the years. All great shooters, and all had the stock swapped out to a Bell & Carlson ~ trust me it is night and day. If you are even remotely considering a Sako have a close look at the Christensen Mesa. They are very, very well made and cheaper than the Sakos. Cannot speak to the accuracy of my Mesa yet as I am still breaking in the barrel, however the fit and finish are excellent for a bog standard factory gun.
__________________
Participating in a gun buy back program because you think that criminals have too many guns is like having yourself castrated because you think your neighbors have too many kids...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-13-2019, 01:42 PM
SakoShooter SakoShooter is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 161
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KevDawg View Post

Are Tikka's really that good? YES
Is it worth the extra $$ to go up to a Sako? YES

Thanks in advance for your opinions & input. YOU'RE WELCOME
Downsides of the Tikka that matter to me:
- 1 action length....all are long actions
- single stack 3 round magazine that protrudes below the action
- stocks could be better.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-13-2019, 02:29 PM
Groundhogger's Avatar
Groundhogger Groundhogger is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Ontario~looking west
Posts: 1,158
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 270person View Post
Dont hear that about T3's much. Oversll they were pretty brutal on the recoil side. Total junk pad. T3x is much better.

I'd actually say that comparing equivalent cartridges above 270 the T3 was the worst by far for recoil. Short of the old Husky's etc. Browning, Weatherby, Remington and Winchester are much better at mitigating recoil.

Plus you move away from all the plastics. Bolt shroud, trigger guard, etc etc. T3x is much better value for the buck and at 850-925 a very decent buy.
Some of the lights are less than that, the varmints a fair bit more. Places like Cabela's list the varmints around $1350, but I got mine from a dealer for $100 less, and shipping included. If I have 1 criticism of the varmint, it has to be the protruding mag. I'd prefer one of the (almost) flush ones, but they sell for almost $90 plus tax. Good mags are expensive, I get that...but if these mags cost half as much, I'd still think they were too expensive. lol Mine functions perfectly, but I'm not crazy about it. Small gripe about an otherwise great rifle.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-13-2019, 02:36 PM
ram crazy ram crazy is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,843
Default

You wouldn't go wrong with a Kimber Hunter rifle either.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-13-2019, 02:51 PM
sns2's Avatar
sns2 sns2 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: My House
Posts: 13,445
Default

We all have our personal preferences, but make no mistake, they are all good rifles. Buy what you like, and what shoulders well. Serious. A spring here or there and they are all within a stone's throw of each other, and will likely be more accurate than the guy pulling the trigger. Some have mentioned CZ and Kimber Hunter. Those are good rifles too.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-13-2019, 03:08 PM
Smokinyotes Smokinyotes is online now
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: onoway, Ab
Posts: 6,957
Default

I have a 22-250, 243, 257wby, 6.5x55, 6.5-284, 270win, 270wsm and 2 300wm, all are Tikkas, all have limbsaver recoil pads. I think the only way to get a smoother action than a Tikka is from a full custom. I don’t see any advantage in buying a Sako A7 over the Tikka.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-13-2019, 03:19 PM
6.5 shooter's Avatar
6.5 shooter 6.5 shooter is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Medicine Hat
Posts: 4,205
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lone wolf View Post
I have had a lot of Tikkas over the years. All great shooters, and all had the stock swapped out to a Bell & Carlson ~ trust me it is night and day. If you are even remotely considering a Sako have a close look at the Christensen Mesa. They are very, very well made and cheaper than the Sakos. Cannot speak to the accuracy of my Mesa yet as I am still breaking in the barrel, however the fit and finish are excellent for a bog standard factory gun.
But why did they have to drill holes in a perfectly good bolt handle.??

Nice looking rifle though.

Biggest complaint on a Tikka t3 is the mag...too short if your a reloader...BUT if you buy one in 6.5x55 they have a longer mag and bullet/cartridge length is a non issue..
__________________
Trades I would interested in:
- Sightron rifle scopes, 4.5x14x42mm or 4x16x42mm
especially! with the HHR reticle. (no duplex pls.)
- older 6x fixed scopes with fine X or target dot.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-13-2019, 03:36 PM
sns2's Avatar
sns2 sns2 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: My House
Posts: 13,445
Default

One of our site sponsors has a nice sale on CZs rifles rith now. If you like wood and blued rifles, this is a nice one.

http://northprosports.com/index.php?...0659&search=cz
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-13-2019, 03:48 PM
Buckhead Buckhead is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Strathcona County
Posts: 1,939
Default

Tikkas are decent hunting "tools". I have 3 of them.
Are they nice rifles? Not particularly - in my books.
Quite ugly IMHO.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-13-2019, 04:14 PM
Curly Bill's Avatar
Curly Bill Curly Bill is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 253
Default

Tikka's are boringly accurate, lightweight and relatively reasonable in price. You should probably buy a Mod 700
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-13-2019, 04:17 PM
Buckhead Buckhead is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Strathcona County
Posts: 1,939
Default

They are all that you say. They are still ugly.
And I wouldn't have a Remington anything on my property
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-13-2019, 04:19 PM
Curly Bill's Avatar
Curly Bill Curly Bill is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 253
Default

I think I have a Remington toque
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 08-13-2019, 04:21 PM
Buckhead Buckhead is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Strathcona County
Posts: 1,939
Default

Awesome. Can I use it to start my next campfire?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-13-2019, 04:47 PM
huntingfamily huntingfamily is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 321
Default

Best advice I can give is to visit your nearest gun store that carries these 3. Handle them all and buy the one that fits you best as that is the most important thing.
They will all shoot well.
I was in the same boat as you and opted for the Hell's Canyon after handling the ones I had narrowed it down to.
Good luck.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KevDawg View Post
I've been researching the hell out of new rifles.
My budget is under $2000
I've come down to a Tikka t3x, Browning Hells Canyon or Weatherby Vangurard.

Pretty much every article or forum post I read has complaint in some way about the Browning and Weatherby but no one seems to have a bad thing to say about the Tikka.


Are Tikka's really that good?
Is it worth the extra $$ to go up to a Sako?

Thanks in advance for your opinions & input.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-13-2019, 06:20 PM
wmd wmd is offline
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 76
Default

yes there that good
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-13-2019, 07:02 PM
averagejoe averagejoe is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Grande Cache
Posts: 667
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 270person View Post
Dont hear that about T3's much. Oversll they were pretty brutal on the recoil side. Total junk pad. T3x is much better.
The hunter is a wood stock so the weight soaks up a bit of the recoil vs the plastic stock which is what most people have. IIRC it is a tad over a 1/2 lb heavier.

Replacing the stock recoil pad with a softer one helped even more.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-13-2019, 07:14 PM
270person 270person is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,496
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by averagejoe View Post
The hunter is a wood stock so the weight soaks up a bit of the recoil vs the plastic stock which is what most people have. IIRC it is a tad over a 1/2 lb heavier.

Replacing the stock recoil pad with a softer one helped even more.


I've got a Hunter 7rm and it kicks a whack harder than my Rem 7rm. 26" barrel shouldnt be the difference. Mind you my very heavy 270 replete with the world's heaviest scope, Nikon Monarch, kicks harder than the Rem as well.
__________________
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by the speed of light squared... ...then you energy.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-13-2019, 07:20 PM
marky_mark marky_mark is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,701
Default

I had a 300 wby vanguard
Awesome rifle
Was stolen
Figure I’d replace it with a 270 wsm tikka
I sold it as fast as I could
My 338 rum was a far more pleasant rifle to shoot then that tikka
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 08-13-2019, 07:23 PM
Ariu Ariu is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 314
Default

I have had two Tikkas. One in 300WM synthetic stock and a 300WSM with wood stock. They both kicked, especially the wsm which had a sting kind of kick.

They are accurate with a smooth action and good trigger.
If you reload, the length of the magazine might restrict the OAL you want. Also depending on usage, the magazine get kind of loose with time.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 08-13-2019, 07:46 PM
BlackHeart's Avatar
BlackHeart BlackHeart is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,999
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SakoShooter View Post
Downsides of the Tikka that matter to me:
- 1 action length....all are long actions
- single stack 3 round magazine that protrudes below the action
- stocks could be better.
The above are the most common complaint against them.
You could spend another 1200-1400 for a Sako 85 and solve them....

There are also 5 round mags.
I like the mag shape.....easy to fit to fit in your front breast pocket, inside jacket chest pocket , or back hip pocket. Try that with a double stack.

I dislike hinge plates. Seen nice guns with rust in the front of receiver where bolt locks in. Reason.....hunting in snowy conditions. Guy unloads by unhinging, bullets spill in the snow, fishes them out, puts them in a front jacket hip pocket with wet snow covered hands. Buddy suggests they try a different cut line. Reloads the wet bullets with wet hands. Chambering a bullet wipes the moisture off and leaves it right where it can’t be seen but will rust if not cleaned soon.

Most of my hunting guns are Tikkas or CZs
Last gun I bought was a heavy barrel Tikka in 204ruger.
Factory loads 32gr ....put all 5 with no paper left between them...can only see 3 part circles.

Same effect for my Tikka 260rem.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 08-13-2019, 07:51 PM
teledogs's Avatar
teledogs teledogs is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,649
Default

I have 2 Tikka T3s. I chose them because of fit & budget, they are both fine shooters. My only peeve is the one length action. The 223 rounds look a little silly in that long magazine.
__________________
There is no God higher than truth - Gandhi

Protect the oppressed even if an enemy, never forgive the traitor especially if he is your friend
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 08-13-2019, 08:25 PM
Dubious Dubious is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,521
Default

The tikka rifles have a cult like following with good reason out of the box a nice crisp trigger smooth bolt like a greased pig they shoot well and they sit right at that price point where there not expensive but there not cheap either. That’s the good stuff everyone likes.

But I have found the tikkas not to shoot any better than any of the other rifles at a similar price point there chambered long and have short mag so you can never load the rounds out to the lands cause the mags limit your length one length action and plastic junk mags.

If I know a guy is going to just shoot factory ammo the tikka is one of the rifles I’ll recommend as a good out of the box shooter. If I know the guys are going to hand load or start swapping parts I’ll never recommend the tikka. These rifles do well for there price point but there performance has not ever lived up to there reputations. I’ve had 2 tikkas and a sako tikkas are gone sako got a barrel and a stock swap.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.