Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 12-01-2020, 01:56 PM
Dean2's Avatar
Dean2 Dean2 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Near Edmonton
Posts: 15,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
They definitely show a preference for being seated deeply
Agreed and the groups seem to shrink the faster u push them. Almost all my loads with Barnes are just off max pressure.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 12-01-2020, 03:15 PM
M70 M70 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 747
Default

The crunching sound of the press made me a little nervous so I switched from IMR 4350 to 4064 and still got good accuracy.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 01-04-2021, 01:52 PM
Stinky Coyote Stinky Coyote is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,189
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prairiekid View Post
Hey Stinky. I don't disagree, I read your posts and they are interesting. I have had my quarter bore for almost 20 years, and it has been my only hunting rifle. Instead of taking someones word for it I wanted to try a .30 caliber magnum for myself, mostly for bullet weight and frontal diameter. I do think the 300 wsm is a great cartridge! But for what I am doing, yes it is over kill. I grew up in the prairies and have since switched to still hunting the bush, that's the reason for the close quarter shots.

But the post was about Barnes, I assume you would consider the TTSX if you were launching your projectiles just a little quicker?
Yo, i totally meant that tongue in cheek, you clearly got killing down pat and more importantly 'hunting'. I took my little time out, not always can text portray even with the winky face.

So...sorry to yourself or anyone else i may have offended. Let's get back at'er.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 01-04-2021, 01:54 PM
Stinky Coyote Stinky Coyote is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,189
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by catnthehat View Post
Over gunned? By who's criteria and opinion, yours?
Interesting post......
Cat
Ya, if you can't kill em with a Grendel then you're compensating.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 01-04-2021, 07:26 PM
Andrzej's Avatar
Andrzej Andrzej is offline
Gone Hunting
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,708
Default

I love Barnes TTSX for many reasons.
Accuracy, little meat damage, versatility?

This neck shot was from 300 Win Mag 180 gr TTSX at about 10 yards...
I posted this before (had to do it again)

__________________
From Wikipedia
"No safe threshold for lead exposure has been discovered—that is, there is no known amount of lead that is too small to cause the body harm."

150 TTSX vs Goat-WOW
http://youtu.be/37JwmSOQ3pY
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 01-04-2021, 07:53 PM
Thunder Elk Hunter's Avatar
Thunder Elk Hunter Thunder Elk Hunter is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Busby
Posts: 781
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
They definitely show a preference for being seated deeply
I agree have not found one that you can set to deep
__________________
moochers electing looters to steal from producers:

some day I'll shoot a deer bigger than my son's.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 01-04-2021, 08:03 PM
EagleEyes EagleEyes is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 182
Default

With all this Barnes talk am thinking of picking a box up for my 300wsm. Seems most guys use the 168 gr bullet. They make a 165 gr for cases with a short COAL like the 300 wsm. 165's seem a little harder to find at least around here. Has anyone seen a difference in performance with their rifle?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.