Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Hunting Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-26-2009, 02:39 PM
Raptor's Avatar
Raptor Raptor is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Redneck Country, Alberta
Posts: 496
Default Cull or Hunt?

Raptor asks: Just a thought. I have been up to the Zama area many times and have seen many a Buffalo by the roads, on the lease sites, etc. and they are pretty docile as far as not being to afraid of vehicles or people.
Just a question to throw out there - "Was this Buffalo hunt, really hunting in the true meaning of fair chase rules or was this just Cull killing?" I'm not judging, because the meat is great, but what do you guys say on this?
Myself personally, I think this was more of a cull than a hunt, but that is just my opinion. What's yours?

From: munyee4321 - Well technically it is a cull hunt just thinning down the herd in these areas. This doesn't necessary mean its not fair chase its not like these animals are caged or fenced in and shot, they were all free ranging and lets face it just like any other animal out there that hasn't been shot at ever over a number of years they adapt to the fact that humans drive by them all the time with out signs of any danger. The lucky guys that got drawn and were successful worked extremely hard to get these large beasts, some trophy hunted others shot the first one they saw for the meat. I would consider this a hunt of a lifetime.

From: Raptor - No question, the tough part would be after the shot. But hunts like these sometimes gives hunting a bad name. Don't get me wrong, I'm not against it, and I would have gone had I'd been drawn, but it does have the border deer cull markings all over it, minus the CWD.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-26-2009, 04:00 PM
209x50's Avatar
209x50 209x50 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,412
Default

How about if I do take you the wrong way? All hunts exist for the sake of controlling populations, while some maybe more difficult than others they are all still hunting and I personally would never criticize the opportunity to hunt. Who cares what the antis think? They are against hunting period and there are no levels of good or bad hunting in their minds.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-26-2009, 04:17 PM
Chet's Avatar
Chet Chet is online now
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,187
Default

My Opinion:

Sending a boney old Angus cow that doesn't throw a decent calf to the auction is a cull.

Hunting a wild, free ranging Bison in northern Alberta would be a great hunt.

Last edited by Chet; 02-26-2009 at 05:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-26-2009, 04:41 PM
Tundra Monkey's Avatar
Tundra Monkey Tundra Monkey is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Prosperous Lake, NT
Posts: 5,633
Default

I'll agree with Chet. All hunting could be considered a "cull". It is a tool in managing wildlife period. If it is not sustainable....they cancel or cut it back.

An animal that gets passed by 200 vehicles a day eventually gets used to them. Now if everyone stopped and shot at them....do you think they would be hanging around??.....no different with bear on the tundra with all the mining exploration. Man is not seen as a threat anymore.....until the bear runs into the wrong person....then it's game over. Gone are the days of a bear running in fear of man up here boyz.....50/50 at best unless you're letting them know they ain't welcome.

tm
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-26-2009, 05:50 PM
goober's Avatar
goober goober is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Never Never Land
Posts: 1,751
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raptor View Post
Raptor asks: Just a thought. I have been up to the Zama area many times and have seen many a Buffalo by the roads, on the lease sites, etc. and they are pretty docile as far as not being to afraid of vehicles or people.
Take the same animals and put them in a high traffic hunting area and I do not think they would appear so docile and fearless. They simply do not see the traffic that is needed to install fear of roads and people in to them.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-26-2009, 06:04 PM
Vindalbakken Vindalbakken is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,790
Default

Chet already got it. Every hunt is a cull.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-26-2009, 06:32 PM
packhuntr's Avatar
packhuntr packhuntr is offline
Gone Hunting
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: rooster heaven
Posts: 4,066
Default

I dont think Chet was saying what you guys have interpreted from his comments. Im going to agree with him, its a hunt for one of the greatest Western Big Game animals on the continent, it surely isnt a cull, nor is it anything like it.
__________________
MULEY MULISHA

It's just Alberta boys... Take what you can while you can,, if ya cant beat em join em.

Keep a strain on er
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-26-2009, 06:40 PM
packhuntr's Avatar
packhuntr packhuntr is offline
Gone Hunting
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: rooster heaven
Posts: 4,066
Default

When its -40 degrees C. and there is 4 feet of snow, everything stands on the road, travels the road etc etc. If they had a moose hunt that time of year, youd see a heck of alot of game off and on the gravel roads all over Northern Alberta. Would any of those other situations be considered culls? When a trapper snares wolves in 4 feet of snow on a trail broken by a snow machine, is it considered a cull?

I do see what you guys are saying, and i do agree, its just the way it was interpreted by the initial poster that defies what the true meaning of this actually is.
__________________
MULEY MULISHA

It's just Alberta boys... Take what you can while you can,, if ya cant beat em join em.

Keep a strain on er
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-26-2009, 06:52 PM
deanmc deanmc is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Whitecourt AB
Posts: 3,867
Default

Taken from Gov of Alberta website;
http://alberta.ca/home/NewsFrame.cfm...678F90364.html

"Is this management hunt unique in Alberta? Canada?
This is a unique management hunt for Alberta. Bison hunting has been implemented in the Yukon and Northwest Territories for similar reasons - to control populations and distribution in order to limit the spread of disease."


As defined in Websters dictionary.

Main Entry: 1cull
Pronunciation: \ˈkəl\
Function: transitive verb
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French culier, coillir, from Latin colligere to bind together — more at collect
Date: 13th century
1: to select from a group : choose <culled the best passages from the poet's work>
2: to reduce or control the size of (as a herd) by removal (as by hunting) of especially weaker animals ; also : to hunt or kill (animals) as a means of population control
— cull·er noun
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-26-2009, 07:20 PM
Raptor's Avatar
Raptor Raptor is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Redneck Country, Alberta
Posts: 496
Default

Man, a guy can't post anything these days without people ripping others opinion.
I never said I would'nt have hunted the buffalo, matter of fact I said I would have gone had I been drawn. But the fact is these buffalo were culled to keep the population from spreading east and become infected by other buffalo. This is culling in it true sense of the word. I am a bow hunter and rifle hunter and I know what fair chase rules are. Yes, animals are always by the roads, especially when there is deep snow. But from my experience, they high tail it when you get out of the truck. You could have walked up to these buffalo and hand fed them. I know because I witnessed this on the rig sites. I think maybe a year of scaring the crap out of them by phantom hunts might have helped make them more afraid, thus my definition of fair chase would kick in.
209X50 - you need to chill out.
Everyone has their own opinion, so be it. That doesn't mean I am wrong or you are wrong.
I just laid out the question and if this is what this board is about - cut the crap out of the other guys opinion, a person might as well just keep silent.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-26-2009, 07:38 PM
Tatonka Tatonka is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Montana
Posts: 487
Default

I wouldn't consider a hunt for a buffalo regardless of where it takes place as a huge challenge, but it's still a hunt. If I were to get lucky enough to get a tag I'd probably view it more as a chance to get some great meat and and a buffalo hide. Not all hunts are for game that is extremely wary and difficult to find... I've seen hunts on TV for Moose and Muskox that didn't exactly tax the hunters hunting skills and ability. If you're enjoying the outdoors and abiding by the game laws it doesn't matter whether you are culling an animal that needs to be culled, hunting for meat, for horns, or whatever.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-26-2009, 08:16 PM
209x50's Avatar
209x50 209x50 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raptor View Post
Man, a guy can't post anything these days without people ripping others opinion.
I never said I would'nt have hunted the buffalo, matter of fact I said I would have gone had I been drawn. But the fact is these buffalo were culled to keep the population from spreading east and become infected by other buffalo. This is culling in it true sense of the word. I am a bow hunter and rifle hunter and I know what fair chase rules are. Yes, animals are always by the roads, especially when there is deep snow. But from my experience, they high tail it when you get out of the truck. You could have walked up to these buffalo and hand fed them. I know because I witnessed this on the rig sites. I think maybe a year of scaring the crap out of them by phantom hunts might have helped make them more afraid, thus my definition of fair chase would kick in.
209X50 - you need to chill out.
Everyone has their own opinion, so be it. That doesn't mean I am wrong or you are wrong.
I just laid out the question and if this is what this board is about - cut the crap out of the other guys opinion, a person might as well just keep silent.
You expressed an opinion and I expressed mine, isn't that what this board is all about? Or did you just want people who agreed with you to post?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-26-2009, 08:18 PM
deanmc deanmc is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Whitecourt AB
Posts: 3,867
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raptor View Post
Everyone has their own opinion, so be it. That doesn't mean I am wrong or you are wrong.
I just laid out the question and if this is what this board is about - cut the crap out of the other guys opinion, a person might as well just keep silent.
X2
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-26-2009, 08:28 PM
packhuntr's Avatar
packhuntr packhuntr is offline
Gone Hunting
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: rooster heaven
Posts: 4,066
Default

Why start a thread looking for view points and others perceptions if you dont want to hear what others think about it?
__________________
MULEY MULISHA

It's just Alberta boys... Take what you can while you can,, if ya cant beat em join em.

Keep a strain on er
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-26-2009, 08:57 PM
209x50's Avatar
209x50 209x50 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,412
Default

^^^ X2,^^^


I guess I need smilies in my posts so people don't get so upset when I disagree with them!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-27-2009, 08:03 AM
hwkirby's Avatar
hwkirby hwkirby is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 184
Default

As this thread is already getting side tracked I can't help but throw in my .02 cents worth. Raptor you flat out asked what others opinions were in regard to the hunt and you got them. What else do you expect? I personally did not find 209x50 to be rude or arrogant. I thought what he had to say was very truthful. In forums/threads like these I think we need to agree to disagree.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.