 |
02-12-2019, 05:37 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: GRAND PRAIRIE
Posts: 5,720
|
|
Los Angeles bans all wild furs
Just seen on the news the city of Los Angeles is banning all wild fur except for nuisance animals
|
02-13-2019, 12:22 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 584
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 35 whelen
Just seen on the news the city of Los Angeles is banning all wild fur except for nuisance animals
|
Would you have a link?
|
02-13-2019, 06:48 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 614
|
|
Hmmm. One would think that the city of LA has more important things to do. What a bunch of maroons.
|
02-13-2019, 06:53 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: GRAND PRAIRIE
Posts: 5,720
|
|
No I don't saw it on Los Angeles news last night, they're hoping all major cities follow suit
|
02-13-2019, 07:09 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: WMU 108
Posts: 6,299
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 35 whelen
Just seen on the news the city of Los Angeles is banning all wild fur except for nuisance animals
|
And how do these propose to do that ??  I just looked on another forum and I think you may mean California is considering banning trapping .
Last edited by H380; 02-13-2019 at 07:27 AM.
|
02-13-2019, 08:06 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Provost
Posts: 5,009
|
|
|
02-13-2019, 09:05 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 172
|
|
Notice this part...
"The ban includes a number of exemptions: Used furs can still be sold at secondhand shops. People can still sell or trade the pelts of dead animals preserved through taxidermy. And the city will not prohibit fur produced from animals taken lawfully under a trapping license."
|
02-13-2019, 09:11 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Provost
Posts: 5,009
|
|
I know....whole thing makes NO sense!!
|
02-13-2019, 09:42 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 509
|
|
Propaganda!
|
02-13-2019, 11:17 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: In a tree near ALTA
Posts: 3,061
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 35 whelen
Just seen on the news the city of Los Angeles is banning all wild fur except for nuisance animals
|
Time to get my eyes checked,,,, I thought I read the heading ?
Los Angeles bans ALL Wild Fire seams possible huh ?
|
02-13-2019, 12:48 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 382
|
|
Correct me if I'm wrong.
They aren't banning people from wearing fur.
They are banning the sale of fur? So basically stores couldn't sell a coat with fur trim or a pair of fur gloves?
Is this correct?
How come they aren't banning leather products as well lol...
|
02-13-2019, 01:08 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 227
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by H380
And how do these propose to do that ?? I just looked on another forum and I think you may mean California is considering banning trapping . |
What do they trap in California . Cougar?????
|
02-13-2019, 01:36 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Copperhead Road, Morinville
Posts: 19,290
|
|
So, no Canada Goose stores opening there? 
|
02-13-2019, 05:43 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: northern AB
Posts: 2,241
|
|
Hey guys.....let's not sweat that stuff we have no control of. For example, there are emission standards set on the brake pads of the Bombardier SXS, that have to comply to Calif. limits and becuz of their standards. They might last you 100hrs before you have to go to a jobber set.
Soon, they will fall into the sea and then we will carry on without them.
|
02-13-2019, 08:50 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SE, Saskatchewan
Posts: 671
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sourdough doug
Soon, they will fall into the sea and then we will carry on without them.
|
 
|
02-13-2019, 09:36 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,245
|
|
Last time I was in LA wild fur should have been the least of their worries. The have a different type of wild fur down there that’s out of control. Good thing their priorities are in the right place.
|
02-14-2019, 03:28 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: In a tree near ALTA
Posts: 3,061
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by treeroot
Correct me if I'm wrong.
They aren't banning people from wearing fur.
They are banning the sale of fur? So basically stores couldn't sell a coat with fur trim or a pair of fur gloves?
Is this correct?
How come they aren't banning leather products as well lol...
|
Tough to interpret some of this type of weird legal mumbo-jumbo ,,,
Can beavers still have hair in California ?
|
02-15-2019, 12:37 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 386
|
|
With all the pepper guts running wild and Free around Kalifornia, Fur is there least and also most important deviation from the real issue. One big Quake and one in NY and we'll be good as said prior here. 
|
02-17-2019, 10:19 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2016
Location: usa
Posts: 50
|
|
Two many tree huger's . Let the cougars get em.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:51 AM.
|
