Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-25-2018, 01:36 PM
fps plus fps plus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,835
Default Results 30-06/30-06 Ackley Improved /30Gibbs

I have a few results to share
This by no means a scientific experiment but my results . My ball my game my rules .

I used a Ruger M-77 30-06 with 22 inch barrel (factory). A factory box of International ammo with 180 gr x bullets to start. Components Federal 215 primers , Sierra 180 gr spritzer (2150) H4350,H4831sc,Imr 4831 and Re22.The same brass (Remington ) from the box of factory ammo was used for all cartridges. Sierra 180 used for all test except for the original firing of factory ammo. Seating depth for all loads 3.340 which is SAAMI specs. Used a Chrony.

I don't know what the pressures were but tried to stay in a range when primers and web expansion were indicators ,backing of slightly when they seemed high.

I am not going to list the actual charge weight of loads , just the highest velocity.

VELOCITIES;
1 -- 30-06 std Factory 180 2683fps

2--30-06 std handload 180 sierra 2731fps

3--30-06 Ackley chamber firing the 30-06 factory (1) 2655fps

4--30-06 Ackley chamber firing the same 30-06 std handload( #2) 2762fps

5-- 30-06 Ackley firing Ackley brass 2906. fps

6--30 Gibbs using formed 30 Gibbs brass 3000fps



The Ackley is easy to form by simply firing standard ammo in the
Improved chamber . The Gibbs I formed from the Ackley brass and fire form by jamming the bullet into the lands and Trailboss powder. No brass was lost in either chambering .

The #6 load is a little warm and I probably would back down a little but I think 2975fps is doable with no issues.

It appears bolt thrust is quite different with the straighter wall cartridges .I had a load that blew primers but bolt lift was not an issue.

note I have faster velocity firing my standard handload in the Ackley chamber than in the standard chamber ?????????

Last edited by fps plus; 03-25-2018 at 01:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-25-2018, 04:48 PM
bat119's Avatar
bat119 bat119 is online now
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: On the border in Lloydminster
Posts: 8,363
Default

Thanks for sharing your experiment
Its interesting there was little gain between the Ackley and the Gibbs I thought it would be more. A 10% gain over a standard 30-06 is still a good result.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-25-2018, 04:55 PM
fps plus fps plus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,835
Default

Remember this is a 22 inch barrel.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-25-2018, 04:57 PM
Don_Parsons Don_Parsons is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 1,827
Default

Awesome project fps, always nice to see these older chamberings on the go.

Don
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-25-2018, 05:05 PM
fps plus fps plus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,835
Default

I tried to keep my opinion out and just show results. I found it quite interesting .

From a gunsmithing perspective its easier to cut a Gibbs chamber than an Ackley ,as the Ackley should have the barrel set back before re-chambering .Which is one more step.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-25-2018, 05:31 PM
skidderman skidderman is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Spruce Grove, AB
Posts: 3,045
Default

Interesting. In a remington 700 30-06 I was able to get 2780 to 2800 in a 22" barrel. 180 grain nosler accubonds with a stiff load of RL22. Chrono may or may not be accurate. I inquired with a gunsmith once about doing an ackly & he talked me out of it. In a similar rifle I had previously it was approx 50fps lower. Chasing velocity along with accuracy is certainly a challenge.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.