I was thinking about this the other day. So funny we need a bow permit for "traditional hunting" aka bow and arrow yet for rifle (the majority of hunters) no rifle permit.
IF the purpose of these fees was to go towards conservation would it not make sense to have a rifle permit and no bow permit?
Don't shoot me here, it was just a thought. I'm as cheap as the next guy and wouldn't want to pay any more than I have to lol