|
|
11-30-2014, 08:40 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: MB
Posts: 1,689
|
|
Deer head on into chest 75 yards found at back hip. 110gr 270 wsm.
Same shot. deferent deer.
__________________
|
11-19-2015, 11:52 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cold Lake
Posts: 206
|
|
300 Barnes Mz expander
Pulled this Barnes 300 grain 50 cal Mz expander out of a decent whitetail tonight. The deer was shot facing straight at me from about 40 yds and the bullet was recovered from near the hip after going through the heart, lung and some gut. Muzzle velocity would have been around 1900 ft/sec I think. Surprisingly he ran about 50 yds but it was an amazing blood trail for only an entry wound. Recovery weight was 299.2 grains.
|
11-23-2015, 06:18 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: calgary
Posts: 423
|
|
Are you guys hand loading these?? I'm trying to work up a load for my 308 win. But they seem to be compressing the powder. Any tips??
|
11-23-2015, 06:25 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,111
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by overhere
Are you guys hand loading these?? I'm trying to work up a load for my 308 win. But they seem to be compressing the powder. Any tips??
|
What bullet weight are you using and how far are you seating them from the lands?
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
|
11-23-2015, 06:43 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: calgary
Posts: 423
|
|
I follow my book so .... At 41.5 grns 3031. And bullet oal 2.780. It is compressing the powder. I don't know if that is safe ????? I noticed that the 150 gmx. Is way longer than a 150 sp interlock
|
11-23-2015, 06:51 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,111
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by overhere
I follow my book so .... At 41.5 grns 3031. And bullet oal 2.780. It is compressing the powder. I don't know if that is safe ????? I noticed that the 150 gmx. Is way longer than a 150 sp interlock
|
I would be measuring the distance to the lands with that bullet, and then seat them .050" off of the lands, as long as they still fit the magazine at that length. That will likely be considerably longer than the COL given in the manual, so that you won't be compressing the powder as much. If you don't like compressed loads , forget the 3031, and try some TAC. Budget Shooters Supply has TAC on hand. Other dealers may also have it in stock.
As well, if you never experiment with seating depths, your rifle is very likely not producing the accuracy that it is capable of producing.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Last edited by elkhunter11; 11-23-2015 at 07:10 PM.
|
11-23-2015, 06:58 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Blackfalds
Posts: 6,945
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by overhere
I follow my book so .... At 41.5 grns 3031. And bullet oal 2.780. It is compressing the powder. I don't know if that is safe ????? I noticed that the 150 gmx. Is way longer than a 150 sp interlock
|
The GMX is longer because it is made of all copper which is lighter than lead. So to be the same weight, there is more material.
|
11-23-2015, 07:12 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,111
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiabeticKripple
The GMX is longer because it is made of all copper which is lighter than lead. So to be the same weight, there is more material.
|
The Barnes bullets like the TSX/TTSX/LRX are made with pure copper, Hornady uses gilding metal for the GMX. But you are correct in that it is lighter than lead.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
|
11-23-2015, 07:31 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: calgary
Posts: 423
|
|
So a compressed load is still safe? As long as I work up slow like any other load
|
11-23-2015, 07:42 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15,829
|
|
There is nothing wrong with compressed loads. As long as the bullet stays put.
__________________
“I love it when clients bring Berger bullets. It means I get to kill the bear.”
-Billy Molls
|
11-24-2015, 04:38 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Alberta
Posts: 4,279
|
|
Elk, 200-250yrds from a 300RUM - 180gr tsx. I found 4 other separate petals, but this was the only complete bullet recovered. Not sure how it came to rest where it did, but here it is.
|
11-24-2015, 12:29 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 475
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bergerboy
Is there a rule of thumb for the lowest velocity TSX's can reliably expand? I have read 2500fps of impact velocity should be the lower level. Do you have a rough idea of what the impact velocity was with those bullets?
|
I read a barnes brochure that said 1600fps was the low end. I have a recovered 140 tsx that I pulled from a ram taken at over 400 yards. It opened up just fine.
|
11-24-2015, 06:21 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,363
|
|
Most TSX's require about 2000 fps for good expansion. Some LRX bullets are designed to expand adequately down to 1600.
|
11-24-2015, 07:03 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 160
|
|
Here's a few LRX 168's out of mine & my brothers rifles...
image.jpg
These two were recovered out of a 335" Bull Elk, rough impact of 2875fps. Picture perfect expansion.
|
11-24-2015, 07:19 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 160
|
|
image.jpg
And of these two, the left was recovered in a big bull Elk as well, but was an impact of roughly 2300 fps, bullet drove right thru ribs on each side of the chest cavity and lodged under the offside skin.. shot was at 700 yards, bull was bedded. 2 consecutive follow up shots both passed through once he was hit and stood. Pretty certain the first one lodged just-because of the angle and position the bull was at when it impact
...the bullet on the right was recovered in my testing here at home into soaked, wet dirt at 940 yards & roughly 1825fps. So the LRX anyway, they do open below 2000fps.
The interesting thing to note is how much bullet gets chewed away as those babies are plowing through penetrating gristle and bone, like mine & a few other guys' have posted in previous posted pics* I find that amazing. Looking at the way the forward side of the bullet (where the pedals came off) is totally polished smooth from travelling through that animal just goes to show how 'tough' & abrasive the flesh, bone and gristle really is! And the nice thing to take from it-is that the bullet continued along it's path furthering the kill.. which is what we want. I feel this is a huge benefit of "solids" on big-boned heavy game that gets overlooked by alot of shooters.
|
11-24-2015, 08:20 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: WMU 108
Posts: 2,465
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by whiskeywillow
Attachment 114697
And of these two, the left was recovered in a big bull Elk as well, but was an impact of roughly 2300 fps, bullet drove right thru ribs on each side of the chest cavity and lodged under the offside skin.. shot was at 700 yards, bull was bedded. 2 consecutive follow up shots both passed through once he was hit and stood. Pretty certain the first one lodged just-because of the angle and position the bull was at when it impact
...the bullet on the right was recovered in my testing here at home into soaked, wet dirt at 940 yards & roughly 1825fps. So the LRX anyway, they do open below 2000fps.
The interesting thing to note is how much bullet gets chewed away as those babies are plowing through penetrating gristle and bone, like mine & a few other guys' have posted in previous posted pics* I find that amazing. Looking at the way the forward side of the bullet (where the pedals came off) is totally polished smooth from travelling through that animal just goes to show how 'tough' & abrasive the flesh, bone and gristle really is! And the nice thing to take from it-is that the bullet continued along it's path furthering the kill.. which is what we want. I feel this is a huge benefit of "solids" on big-boned heavy game that gets overlooked by alot of shooters.
|
What rifle setup are you shooting?
|
11-24-2015, 09:26 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 475
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordan Smith
Most TSX's require about 2000 fps for good expansion. Some LRX bullets are designed to expand adequately down to 1600.
|
Where did you hear that? That is not what I have read. Barnes bullets claims their tsx will open up in ballistic gelatin at 1600 fps. I am talking about the good old bare bones TSX. I have never researched what Barnes claims about the minimum velocity window of the LRX.
|
11-24-2015, 09:34 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,111
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sevenmil
Where did you hear that? That is not what I have read. Barnes bullets claims their tsx will open up in ballistic gelatin at 1600 fps. I am talking about the good old bare bones TSX. I have never researched what Barnes claims about the minimum velocity window of the LRX.
|
Barnes lists 1800 to 2000fps for the TSX/TTSX, and 1600fps for the LRX.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
|
11-24-2015, 10:08 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 160
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KBF
What rifle setup are you shooting?
|
7.21 Lazzeroni Firebird, built into a Sako action. 168 LRX@3200fps
Been shooting this rifle for just about 15 years, almost everything I've ever hunted has been hunted with-it... and I hunt alot. It started out as a TRG-S Sako and has since been fully customized, re-barreled, re-stocked, lightened and braked to serve as my #1 go-to for everything hunting rig. Hands down favorite one.
In my opinion, a solid like the LRX at the velocity I can push it is a combination that I'd trust even in the event it had to stop a Bear someplace in an unfriendly situation.. but we won't go there and start 'that' lol... Plain English, I'd be confident to carry it anyplace I ever intend to draw tags and take my horses, or dirty my boots & knife.
...close range, or long (if it had to be)
|
11-25-2015, 07:18 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 475
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11
Barnes lists 1800 to 2000fps for the TSX/TTSX, and 1600fps for the LRX.
|
Where do they list this? Can't find this on their website.
|
11-25-2015, 05:04 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,111
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sevenmil
Where do they list this? Can't find this on their website.
|
They used to list the minimum velocities on the website.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
|
11-25-2015, 05:10 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,363
|
|
A quick email to them will likely get a response from Ty listing the info you seek. Each model of bullet is a bit different, so it helps to cite the particular bullet you'd like info on.
|
11-25-2015, 06:15 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sherwood park
Posts: 299
|
|
Here is a 180 ttsx that traveled through about 4 ft of elk. Shot from a 300 rum at around 100 yards. The bullet beside it is a 150 grain scirocco ii from a 280 ackley at around 100 yards as well. Both bullets were found up against the hide on the opposite side of the elk they were used on.
|
11-30-2016, 11:21 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 512
|
|
Dug this one out of the off side leg bone of a WT. It was a quartering away shot behind the last rib that went through the heart and lodged in the leg bone just below the joint, shattering the leg into tiny fragments. Deer travelled 50 meters, Weatherby mag 240, 3350 fps, distance was 230ish meters.
Last edited by Yaha Tinda; 12-14-2016 at 07:47 PM.
|
11-30-2016, 08:43 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,850
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bergerboy
There is that center rib that piques my interest.
|
Its the tsx central miracle. Let inspiration make you a believer, whatever you see
|
12-01-2016, 06:38 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 322
|
|
Long Range Bullet Shootout
|
12-01-2016, 07:53 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 88
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by overhere
So a compressed load is still safe? As long as I work up slow like any other load
|
I use 130 gr. TTSX in my Sako .308 with 49.1 gr. of Varget. COAL: 2.810 It's compressed but no issues what's so ever. Gives me about 3000 fps. Very accurate load!
Last edited by sure as shootin'; 12-01-2016 at 07:59 AM.
|
12-11-2016, 09:05 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2014
Location: etown
Posts: 321
|
|
Recovered this from a cow moose at 18m. It broke her far side shoulder after going through the lungs and I pulled it out during butchery. 150 grain TTSX from my .308 over 46.3 grains of Varget. It's my first year shooting copper bullets - I think I'll keep it up.
|
12-11-2016, 09:12 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: wmu 222, member #197
Posts: 4,907
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FishHunterPro
Shot my buck this year with my 7mm-08 and 120TTSX at about 30-40yrds tops. Had a quick scan of the kill site and found my bullet in a tree maybe another 15yrd behind my buck.
|
although not very poplar, its bark is worse than its bite!
|
12-11-2016, 09:16 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Communist state
Posts: 13,245
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilsner Man
Here is a 180 ttsx that traveled through about 4 ft of elk. Shot from a 300 rum at around 100 yards. The bullet beside it is a 150 grain scirocco ii from a 280 ackley at around 100 yards as well. Both bullets were found up against the hide on the opposite side of the elk they were used on.
|
I like the looks of the one on the left. In my opinion the ttsx or the tsx bullets are too hard and lack the hydrostatic shock you get from higher expansion bullets. I try to be a lung shooter and sometimes those Barnes zip right through like stabbing the animal with a pencil, like shooting them with a field point.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:58 PM.
|