Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-05-2008, 09:57 AM
Shrubs
 
Posts: n/a
Default Mountain gun

My sheep hunting partner has called me up a few times to tell me about good deals on light mountain rifles hinting that I should get one. I don't have the experience on the mountain that I'm sure lots here do and I've never had a light mountain rifle. I shoot a regular remington 700.

I guess my question would be is it really worth shelling out $800 to $1500 to buy another gun to save a pound? Does it really make that big a difference?

Keep in mind that I don't have a huge disposable income and purchasing a specialized gun like that would be stretching it a little.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-05-2008, 10:16 AM
Rackmastr Rackmastr is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7,714
Default

Is it worth the $800-1500 for a new gun? In one word...no. You can loose a lb of weight off of SEVERAL other peices of gear easier than your rifle....hell, loosing weight off a gun is harder than loosing weight off most other items...

You do have options though....depending on the gun you shoot right now, you can have work done if you DO want to loose some weight. You can have metal work done, a new stock installed, you can use a lighter scope, go to lighter rings, etc, etc.....a lot of options...

The other way to look at it is if you WANT a new gun. You can sell your gun right now and absorb some of the cost, but it must be a desire to own a light gun...otherwise it aint really 'worth' it IMO....

Lots of options out there, but I guess it all depends on your wants and desires....

In a simple answer though....no...its not worth it unless you personally want it....
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-05-2008, 10:17 AM
Copidosoma's Avatar
Copidosoma Copidosoma is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Edmonton AB
Posts: 1,064
Default

I've never hunted in the mountains but I'd thing there are many easier (less expensive) ways to save a pound. You might even want the weight depending on how much recoil you are dealing with.

Train a bit harder and I'll bet you'll be fine with what you've got.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-05-2008, 10:50 AM
Rust's Avatar
Rust Rust is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 609
Default

Hey shrubs, I agree with the others bout being able to shed some weight else were in the pack. I would not buy a light rifle for a one hunt a yr. If your buddy has one maybe you could talk him into letting you pack his around for a litte bit next time your out to see if it is worth it to you. That is my thoughts for now anyways.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-05-2008, 10:56 AM
harv3589's Avatar
harv3589 harv3589 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,639
Default

The guys above hit it right on...not worth the money for a pound or so weight savings.
__________________
“If you could kick the person in the pants responsible for most of your trouble, you wouldn’t sit for a month.”
—Theodore Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-05-2008, 10:58 AM
Chet's Avatar
Chet Chet is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,187
Default

I agree that its probably not worth it for a few hunts but if you plan on hunting the mountains every year I would seriously consider it, but I guess you should keep in mind that I'm the kind of guy that cuts my toothbrush in half to save weight.

Chet
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-05-2008, 11:09 AM
Rust's Avatar
Rust Rust is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 609
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chet View Post
I agree that its probably not worth it for a few hunts but if you plan on hunting the mountains every year I would seriously consider it, but I guess you should keep in mind that I'm the kind of guy that cuts my toothbrush in half to save weight.

Chet
Sorry chet I couldn't help but laugh when I read this. I have never heard of that.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-05-2008, 11:36 AM
Rackmastr Rackmastr is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7,714
Default

I cut my toothbrush too.....all the weight and size count.....

Hardest thing for me to find is an after-shave bottle thats small enough to pack up the mountain.....hahah....jk
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-05-2008, 11:38 AM
Rust's Avatar
Rust Rust is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 609
Default

wow, guess you can tell that I have never done a Backpack hunt. LOL
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-05-2008, 11:41 AM
Copidosoma's Avatar
Copidosoma Copidosoma is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Edmonton AB
Posts: 1,064
Default

We need to start a thread...

Funny ways to save pack weight...


I wonder if anyone carries helium balloons with them?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-05-2008, 11:41 AM
Tundra Monkey's Avatar
Tundra Monkey Tundra Monkey is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Prosperous Lake, NT
Posts: 5,631
Default

Not that funny Chet It's something I'll never do again....when it is your only luxury....it's kinda nice to get some torque. I did settle on a smaller version of brush but the handle is intact

It's worth it for lotsa reasons....a pound there is as good as a pound anywhere....just means your gonna be a pound lighter after you lighten the rest. Gotta have confidence in your rig....if spending more $$'s on it does that for ya....have at er....got the same affliction myself. Nothing wrong with carrying your mountain rifle on the prairies. Half the fun of hunting for me is the hours and months dreaming about what I have, what I want, what I need and how to make it all better.....it never gets old....just more expensive.

So now that you're buying a rifle .....which one????

tm
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-05-2008, 12:22 PM
shirtr's Avatar
shirtr shirtr is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Behind the line
Posts: 161
Default

The light rifles truely are nice packing around the hills. Wouldn't trade mine in for anything. Love my 700Ti.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-05-2008, 12:22 PM
Frans Frans is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,551
Default

I'm thinking about a Kimber Montana, 5 lbs 5 oz in .308 Win. With a lighter Leupold scope I can probably shave almost 4 lbs off my now almost 10 lbs Tikka M65 in .300WM with a Schmidt&Bender scope and EAW mounts... OK, 3 1/2 lbs.... that's a chunck of weight... at only about $350 per lb lost! ;-)

Of course then I'd no longer be carrying a .300WM.... same gun in .300WM weighs 6 lbs 13 oz, plus scope/mounts. Should I go .300WSM for 6lbs 3 oz?

Decisions, decesions.... I kinda like the idea of a .325WSM too... today... ask me tomorrow, and I may have a different opinion. ;-)

Frans
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-05-2008, 12:25 PM
harv3589's Avatar
harv3589 harv3589 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,639
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frans View Post
I'm thinking about a Kimber Montana, 5 lbs 5 oz in .308 Win. With a lighter Leupold scope I can probably shave almost 4 lbs off my now almost 10 lbs Tikka M65 in .300WM with a Schmidt&Bender scope and EAW mounts... OK, 3 1/2 lbs.... that's a chunck of weight... at only about $350 per lb lost! ;-)

Of course then I'd no longer be carrying a .300WM.... same gun in .300WM weighs 6 lbs 13 oz, plus scope/mounts. Should I go .300WSM for 6lbs 3 oz?

Decisions, decesions.... I kinda like the idea of a .325WSM too... today... ask me tomorrow, and I may have a different opinion. ;-)

Frans
I will really suck when your at the top of a mountain and that Kimber fails you...the Tikka won't seem so bad then.
__________________
“If you could kick the person in the pants responsible for most of your trouble, you wouldn’t sit for a month.”
—Theodore Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-05-2008, 12:29 PM
Dick284's Avatar
Dick284 Dick284 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dreadful Valley
Posts: 14,586
Default

Maybe your looking at the weights and measures issues the wrong way.
Shed naother 10 pounds, and spend a few more hours on your cardio, before thinking about shedding a pound on your rifle.

There are also easier ways of shaving pounds on a pack trip.

Look at your sling, scope, mounts, and amount of ammuntioin your carrying.

How abought your boots, how abought the latest and greatest outdoor wonder gaunch, and socks. Etc. Etc.

The rifle should be the last thing you think about shedding a pound over.

Look at all the small ticket easy to fix up or shorten items, bet you can shave about 5 pounds without investing $100 extra.
__________________


There are no absolutes
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-05-2008, 12:29 PM
roger's Avatar
roger roger is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: wmu 222, member #197
Posts: 4,907
Default

i have an ultralite weatherby and i would highly recommend it (or any) liteweight for any hunt situation any day.
a heavy gun is just that...heavy.

if you really want to save weight in a packhunt, taking 20 of the waist is better than 2 off the gun.

id sell any or all the 'dust collectors' in the gunsafe to get a lighter gun any day of the week
__________________
there are two kinds of people...those with loaded guns and those who dig.
the good, the bad, the ugly

weatherby fans clik here....
http://www.outdoorsmenforum.ca/group.php?groupid=31
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-05-2008, 12:42 PM
Frans Frans is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,551
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by harv3589 View Post
I will really suck when your at the top of a mountain and that Kimber fails you...the Tikka won't seem so bad then.
Yes.... that goes for any brand... is there something you are trying to warn me for?

Frans
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-05-2008, 01:14 PM
40 incher 40 incher is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 37
Default

Amazing what a pound will do, after about day 4 or five I always wish my rifle was a pound lighter!!!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-05-2008, 02:03 PM
harv3589's Avatar
harv3589 harv3589 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,639
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frans View Post
Yes.... that goes for any brand... is there something you are trying to warn me for?

Frans
Kimber is known for their QC short comings and I have experienced that first hand...don't want to see anyone else have a "kimber" experience when it could have been prevented.
__________________
“If you could kick the person in the pants responsible for most of your trouble, you wouldn’t sit for a month.”
—Theodore Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-05-2008, 02:21 PM
wbyfireman wbyfireman is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 94
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rackmastr View Post
I cut my toothbrush too.....all the weight and size count.....

Hardest thing for me to find is an after-shave bottle thats small enough to pack up the mountain.....hahah....jk
Toothbrush....... whats that?

I dissagree with most of these guys. A light wieght gun is worth a bit of money. Youll find yourself going into the mountains more because of it and will probably use it on other hunts as well. Just remember there not the same as a full size rifle. They heat up fast and kick a lot harder.......
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 02-05-2008, 02:54 PM
nekred nekred is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,772
Default

Just a quick question about the mountain rifle......

I have heard of a deer rifle, and elk rifle, a sheep rifle, a moose rifle, a waterfowl gun etc.....

Why the heck would you want to shoot a mountain? You guys a way to tough for me... if you can drag a mountain out!....

Sorry!... just couldn't resist!.....
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-05-2008, 03:01 PM
wbyfireman wbyfireman is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 94
Default

Srubs,

get a weatherby ultra light weight in 270wby and light weight rings and scope and youll be set for every thing. You can get rid of that Remington to help pay for it. With these new Solid lead free bullets you can kill everything with that gun.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-05-2008, 05:24 PM
Mintaka Mintaka is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 442
Default Every ounce counts

.

Last edited by Mintaka; 12-29-2008 at 05:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-05-2008, 06:11 PM
Shrubs
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Wbyfireman, that would have been my next question. What are the differences between a full size and lightweight other than the weight alone? Will a full size last longer and be more reliable?

Thanks for the replies btw.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-05-2008, 06:43 PM
roger's Avatar
roger roger is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: wmu 222, member #197
Posts: 4,907
Default

if I may take a swing,
ultralite vs standard
the bbls are usually shorter in OAL, so velocity will suffer.
the barrels are possibly fluted.
often exotic metals/compounds/polymers are used. titanium and aluminum replace carbon steel. polymers and carbon fiber replace wood or composite..
barrels are designed to have the the least possible safe amount of thickness
the bolt knobs are drilled out or pruned of excess metal,
stocks are hollowed out (great for emergency, 2 bullets, water sterilzer pills, waterproof matches, compass etc) and 'undersized' to reduce mass, also the forends could be shortened.
most of these designs are impervious to climatic changes
skelotonizing, hollowed out or simply eliminated is the order of the day.

will it last as long???
of course it will, a five shot minigun burst at a ram going 9-0 up and over a ridge wont wear it out if you do that every 12 years
blasting 20 rounds in twenty minutes at the range might!! same as any rifle
psst, i would agree with wbyfireman word for word
__________________
there are two kinds of people...those with loaded guns and those who dig.
the good, the bad, the ugly

weatherby fans clik here....
http://www.outdoorsmenforum.ca/group.php?groupid=31
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-05-2008, 06:59 PM
wbyfireman wbyfireman is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 94
Default

Sorry I didnt use the right words there. When I say light wieght I mean a rifle with a fluted barrel, drilled bolt, light weight stock, ect. Something that weights a pound or so lighter then the regular model. example the wby ultra light weight. Being a lighter weight barrel it will heat up faster then a non fluted barrel. Only affecting accuracy after say 5 or 6 quick shots.

As for more reliable.... I think that comes from the brand you buy and how you look after it. Any rifle can be reliable if you look after it. When at the range a fluted barrel will heat up quicker so if you dont take your time sighting in you could possibly burn out the barrel fast then a non fluted barrel. And this could be a range of 1000 to 5000 rounds throught the barrel. Theres a lot of variables. Most guys will never shoot out a barrel in their life time.

If I was in your shoes i would go some where in the middle from a kimber and your rifle. Find a caliber your happy with that will do everything for you. If its a 270, 280, 7mm, 30-06, 300, ect. And buy a light wieght version of the brand you like. Why have a moose rifle, a sheep gun and a deer gun??? Have one gun that you can get comfortable with, something you shoot well and can change bullets for what your hunting.

I spent 4 years guiding in northern BC. All our hunts were backpack hunts and a "lighter" gun was noticeable. There was more then one hunt that I had to carry the clients rifle and noticed the extra pound or two there rifle weighed compaired to mine.

But just remember opinions are like............... you know the rest.


sorry for the bad spelling and the rant!!! haha Make sure you let us know what you decide

Last edited by wbyfireman; 02-05-2008 at 07:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-05-2008, 07:26 PM
wbyfireman wbyfireman is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 94
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mintaka View Post
....the average sheep hunter kills a ram every twelve years.....

Sorry but what????? Remind me not to hunt sheep with you. once evey 12 years??? These guys you speak of arent sheep hunters.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-05-2008, 07:29 PM
jrs
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I simply like carrying a bit lighter rifle in the mountains as it hangs around my shoulder for 10-12 hours a day and a 10lb plus gun gets noticeably heavy. I used to carry an old 30-06 with steel but plate and it felt heavy after 5-10 kilometres. I didn't go with a crazy super light gun (i have a factory tikka T3) but i still like it better than the old Springfield. Maybe not a big deal for everyone but my shoulder is easily agitated after so many past injuries (hockey lead to a few dislocations). Just my two cents, not sure if I'd go for it with the situation you explain, lean towards a better quality pack, it can make an extra 10 lbs a lot less noticeable after a few days of hiking. Another good idea is a nice wide sling, i was too cheap up until last year but it was worth it.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 02-05-2008, 08:24 PM
packhuntr's Avatar
packhuntr packhuntr is offline
Gone Hunting
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: rooster heaven
Posts: 4,066
Default

I cut the tags off all clothing items for these high country hunts...Spending the cash to shave even afew ounces off any gear item is well worth the consideration, if its affordable. I dumped a bunch of weight off my 695 tikka, costly but worth it. If you know what its like to hunt bald prairie with an overweight varmint rig while calling dogs, you definately stand to gain when hunting elevation.

keep a strain on er.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 02-05-2008, 08:42 PM
Mintaka Mintaka is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 442
Default

.

Last edited by Mintaka; 12-29-2008 at 05:45 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.