|
|
12-03-2018, 03:07 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,189
|
|
6.5 cm vs 300 win mag
And just to provide context and a different way for people to view things...
6.5 cm 147 gr vs 300 win mag 200 gr
Factory Hornady Loads
Exact same penetration (sd.301)
6.5 cm has 55.4% less recoil
6.5 cm has 26.5% less bullet weight
6.5 cm has 5.4% less velocity
That is a shat ton less recoil energy giving up very little everywhere else that matters. Basically maintain same velocities at same distances all the way out.
This is the magic of of the 6.5’s...
The Grendel 123 gr does this to the 308 168 gr, almost identically the above.
The PRC 147 does this to the 338 Lapua 250 gr. Not as close as the two examples above but still so close as to compare.
Maybe this helps big picture the actual real world differences better? And show why it’s not hype and marketing.
|
12-03-2018, 03:13 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 46,153
|
|
Having the same S.D. does not mean that they will both penetrate exactly the same amount. And even if they did penetrate the same, if both bullets expand by the same percentage, the larger diameter bullet, will have a larger frontal area, which should produce a larger wound channel. If it really is as simple as having a high S.D. , why not just load up some 100gr .224" bullets for hunting Alaskan Brown bears?
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Last edited by elkhunter11; 12-03-2018 at 03:32 PM.
|
12-03-2018, 03:16 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Blackfalds
Posts: 6,968
|
|
The SD value only holds up for a fully intact bullet. It is not the end all be all.
The 300 win mag will penetrate more at the same distances as the CM
|
12-03-2018, 03:17 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Rocky Mt. House
Posts: 1,829
|
|
Which would rather you shoot an angry grizzly with if you had to not stirring the pot im a big 6.5 fan but I know my answer.
|
12-03-2018, 03:19 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 265
|
|
I bet the 300 carries way more energy all the way and will buck the wind better
|
12-03-2018, 03:41 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,346
|
|
|
12-03-2018, 03:45 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Parkland County, AB
Posts: 4,283
|
|
At an impact velocity (say 2000 fps), a bullet slows to near zero in about 20 or so inches .. all in a millisecond. With the velocity gone, along with the remaining kinetic energy, where did all that remaining energy go and what is the force that keeps that bullet moving ? Just curious.
__________________
When applied by competent people with the right intent, common sense goes a long way.
|
12-03-2018, 04:07 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North
Posts: 2,193
|
|
|
12-03-2018, 04:22 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 536
|
|
Not knocking the Creed or Grendel. But I leave my 6.5x47 at home when I go elk hunting. I feel way more confident carrying my 300 Win Mag with 215 bergers. I’m getting into smaller calibers and the 6.5 is great. But everything has it’s limitations. Depends how far you shoot and placement trumps everything. I posted some numbers in your previous thread. Energy foot pounds isn’t even close when comparing a 6.5 130 gr to a 30 cal 215 gr. I got to run the 147 gr in my Sherman this winter. But again not a fair comparison to the Creed. I’ll drive the 147 around 3200 fps out of my Sherman. Will be impressive I think.
|
12-03-2018, 04:22 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,189
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salavee
At an impact velocity (say 2000 fps), a bullet slows to near zero in about 20 or so inches .. all in a millisecond. With the velocity gone, along with the remaining kinetic energy, where did all that remaining energy go and what is the force that keeps that bullet moving ? Just curious.
|
Good question to ask the dead animal? Or perhaps the wounded one if it gets caught up too?😉
|
12-03-2018, 04:23 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,189
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorty
I bet the 300 carries way more energy all the way and will buck the wind better
|
The only thing that carries energy is your shoulder and sometimes that little spot between your eyes.
|
12-03-2018, 04:24 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,189
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11
Having the same S.D. does not mean that they will both penetrate exactly the same amount. And even if they did penetrate the same, if both bullets expand by the same percentage, the larger diameter bullet, will have a larger frontal area, which should produce a larger wound channel. If it really is as simple as having a high S.D. , why not just load up some 100gr .224" bullets for hunting Alaskan Brown bears?
|
Yes they will penetrate same given same impact velocity and construction(ie; rate of expansion).
No gun will feel big enough with an Alaskan Brown Bear.
|
12-03-2018, 04:30 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 336
|
|
|
12-03-2018, 04:35 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Parkland County, AB
Posts: 4,283
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stinky Coyote
Good question to ask the dead animal? Or perhaps the wounded one if it gets caught up too?😉
|
I would probably get a better answer from a dead animal. No offence, but I thought you could do better than that.
__________________
When applied by competent people with the right intent, common sense goes a long way.
|
12-03-2018, 04:47 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,189
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salavee
I would probably get a better answer from a dead animal.
|
You would, that’s the point. Some can follow the numbers.
|
12-03-2018, 05:05 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,189
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dogslayer403
Which would rather you shoot an angry grizzly with if you had to not stirring the pot im a big 6.5 fan but I know my answer.
|
There’s in no gun going to feel big enough in this situation. Your best chance is to be supremely practiced and deadly. That will matter far more than cartridge selection. Prolly better off with bearspray.
|
12-03-2018, 05:07 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Parkland County, AB
Posts: 4,283
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stinky Coyote
You would, that’s the point. Some can follow the numbers.
|
.. and around and around you go. Thanks Stinky.
__________________
When applied by competent people with the right intent, common sense goes a long way.
|
12-03-2018, 05:15 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,189
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiabeticKripple
The SD value only holds up for a fully intact bullet. It is not the end all be all.
The 300 win mag will penetrate more at the same distances as the CM
|
Penetration is the result of sd and impact velocity.
|
12-03-2018, 05:16 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,665
|
|
I am genuinely curious as to what you're agenda is on this thread and the dozen other 6.5 threads?
|
12-03-2018, 05:17 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Rocky Mt. House
Posts: 1,829
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stinky Coyote
There’s in no gun going to feel big enough in this situation. Your best chance is to be supremely practiced and deadly. That will matter far more than cartridge selection.
|
Agreed im not argueing whats best for that sitution just a reference one is hitting harder with more energy and leaving a bigger hole. You cannot in deny in one of the two compared there is a big difference in stopping power. I have a 358 STA putting 225tsx out at 3100fps the sd and bc is terrible on that bullet and the trajectory is on par at 300yds with the two compared but woth 4900lbs of muzzle energy and a 35cal hole is there even a comparison on killing power between it and the creed.
Appolagize for rambling and not anti creed at all its a fine cartrdge but numbers dont always mean everything and I do see the merit in your points vs recoil you pay a lot for a little more horsepower
|
12-03-2018, 05:21 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,189
|
|
Simply perspective, different way to see why. People have a hard time getting over long stigmatized names or figures that don’t matter like they thought etc. Percentages show how little difference things that people think are big differences really are and how big the differences are that really matter on the trigger side of the equation.
|
12-03-2018, 05:38 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,665
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stinky Coyote
Simply perspective, different way to see why. People have a hard time getting over long stigmatized names or figures that don’t matter like they thought etc. Percentages show how little difference things that people think are big differences really are and how big the differences are that really matter on the trigger side of the equation.
|
Ok. It almost seems like you're pushing some kind of agenda and trying to convert the long action horsepower gun owners from something that they've tried, tested and are happy with to something that you like that imo has less then stellar results in your moòse and deer.
Anyway I do respect your passion for the 6.5 cm.
|
12-03-2018, 05:48 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 1,827
|
|
I heard that the 300 Winchester is the best.
Dang,,, the world keeps changing. Ha
|
12-03-2018, 05:52 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 46,153
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stinky Coyote
Penetration is the result of sd and impact velocity.
|
Penetration is the result of impact velocity, and the S.D. of the bullet as it passes through the animal. With expanding bullets, that also shed mass, the S.D. changes considerably, as the bullet passes through the animal. Therefore, the unfired S.D. is pretty much meaningless, unless you are talking non expanding bullets.
Quote:
No gun will feel big enough with an Alaskan Brown Bear
|
So if you were hunting Alaskan Brown bear and had a choice of carrying a 300win mag, or a 6.5 Creedmoor, which would you choose. If the premise of this thread is correct, it shouldn't matter to you. Personally, I would not have to think about the choice , I would take the 300winmag.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Last edited by elkhunter11; 12-03-2018 at 05:57 PM.
|
12-03-2018, 06:14 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,189
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11
Penetration is the result of impact velocity, and the S.D. of the bullet as it passes through the animal. With expanding bullets, that also shed mass, the S.D. changes considerably, as the bullet passes through the animal. Therefore, the unfired S.D. is pretty much meaningless, unless you are talking non expanding bullets.
So if you were hunting Alaskan Brown bear and had a choice of carrying a 300win mag, or a 6.5 Creedmoor, which would you choose. If the premise of this thread is correct, it shouldn't matter to you. Personally, I would not have to think about the choice , I would take the 300winmag.
|
The first part was going well until sd is meaningless when it’s everything. Almost there. I explained this in another response already.
As for the bear hunt I’d be perfectly content with any appropriate for game impact velocity, sd and bullet construction. I’d likely be after sd over .3, delayed controlled expansion bullet, and impact velocities north of 2200 fps.
|
12-03-2018, 06:16 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caroline
Posts: 7,517
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salavee
I would probably get a better answer from a dead animal. No offence, but I thought you could do better than that.
|
The other 2 amigos should be along shortly to help answer your question
__________________
Two reasons you may think CO2 is a pollutant
1.You weren't paying attention in grade 5
2. You're stupid
Last edited by MountainTi; 12-03-2018 at 06:37 PM.
|
12-03-2018, 06:17 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Communist state
Posts: 13,243
|
|
Why does it always have to be an Alaskan brown bear?
How many grizzlies were shot in Alberta last year? How many of you even had a tag???
You guys do realize this is about penetration, at least that’s what I got from the op.
Fwiw, I doubt anyone would choose a 6.5 Grendel over a 300 magnum if they were grizzly hunting, but being that most of us on the forum live in Alberta I don’t understand why it always has to come back to grizzlies. I’ll bet 99% of the people on this forum haven’t even seen a grizzly in real life. I’ve seen a total
of 5 in my life, and one was in the park. Never once did I wish I had a 300 magnum when I came across a grizzly.
The topic is about penetration, maybe leave the grizzlies alone since they’re protected.
|
12-03-2018, 06:19 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Parkland County, AB
Posts: 4,283
|
|
I dont think his knowledge is anywhere near what he would like us to believe.
So much for spreading the knowledge base
__________________
When applied by competent people with the right intent, common sense goes a long way.
|
12-03-2018, 06:20 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,189
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norwest Alta
Ok. It almost seems like you're pushing some kind of agenda and trying to convert the long action horsepower gun owners from something that they've tried, tested and are happy with to something that you like that imo has less then stellar results in your moòse and deer.
Anyway I do respect your passion for the 6.5 cm.
|
Lol, my 15 yrd recoveries and also amount of shots fired are less than pretty much all the stories of friend kills this year, and their friends? It’s all perfectly acceptable to me as I know how it goes and I’ve been there done that so don’t take those words as criticism of a whole bunch of normal hunting situations and kills. That’s not it at all, I’m not blaming at all, not cartridge, not shooter, no blame, no finger pointing, just stating what happens/ed.
What I’m saying here is that good shooting goes well, marginal shooting goes marginal, lousy shooting is a lottery....and none of it really affected by cartridge choice. Unless you’re shooting lousy because of the cartridge. Other than that I fully expect my Grendel to deliver average results over time and as a direct reflection of my shooting ability. Just as I would expect out of all the other cartridges I’ve shot or been witness too. There’s no surprises in any of it.
|
12-03-2018, 06:20 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,315
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stinky Coyote
6.5 cm 147 gr vs 300 win mag 200 gr
Factory Hornady Loads
Exact same penetration (sd.301)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stinky Coyote
Penetration is the result of sd and impact velocity.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stinky Coyote
Yes they will penetrate same given same impact velocity and construction(ie; rate of expansion).
|
You have to be trolling. Nothing else explains how you justify this as fact.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:46 PM.
|