Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Hunting Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-16-2012, 09:14 PM
missingtwo missingtwo is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: south of Edm
Posts: 517
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheephunter View Post
If I'm not mistaken....bow hunter licence sales represent about 15.8% of wildlife certificate sales.
Thats good info. But, what is really needed is archery mule deer tags compared to the total # of mule deer tags.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-16-2012, 09:22 PM
ishootbambi ishootbambi is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: medicine hat
Posts: 9,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by missingtwo View Post
Thats good info. But, what is really needed is archery mule deer tags compared to the total # of mule deer tags.
be careful what you wish for....in some zones from what ive seen, archery participation would change those numbers for the worse. the point is that archers should be getting their representative percentage of harvest. in some zones archers account for higher percentage, and some cases lower. although some wmus may benefit from actual numbers....others would suffer.

that doesnt apply to mules only by the way.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-16-2012, 09:32 PM
missingtwo missingtwo is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: south of Edm
Posts: 517
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by missingtwo View Post
Thats good info. But, what is really needed is archery mule deer tags compared to the total # of mule deer tags.
Actually, the real # to know is archery mule deer harvest compared to the total harvest
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-16-2012, 09:53 PM
Lefty-Canuck's Avatar
Lefty-Canuck Lefty-Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Look behind you :)
Posts: 27,789
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by missingtwo View Post
Actually, the real # to know is archery mule deer harvest compared to the total harvest
These are the numbers that are "extrapolated for an entire populace due to an insufficient sampling size" in SOME cases.

LC
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-16-2012, 10:43 PM
338Bluff 338Bluff is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,844
Default

Honestly, I think we started this thread about 6 months to early. Its only December 16th for Pete's sake. This is gonna fizzle and we are going to have to spend the rest of the winter arguing about ballistics or why the .270 is the best ever........

All kidding aside when I heard what kind of math they were using to arrive at the stats....I know what they can do with their upcoming survey this year.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.