Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Hunting Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-26-2017, 11:26 AM
HIGHLANDER HUNTING HIGHLANDER HUNTING is offline
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 366
Default body count mentality

A quick rant here,
There's a fine line with hunting. When to know when enough is enough. For me, it's when my freezer is full. When you're thinking about who to give meat to, maybe you're done for the year?

I might get flamed out over this post, but there's a point when just because you have a tag for something, doesn't justify filling it. In my opinion anyway....

Don't we always say that hunting IS conservation?

Cheers.
John
Highlander Hunting Podcast
Attached Images
File Type: jpg HighlanderHunting_logo_email_signature.jpg (14.9 KB, 96 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-26-2017, 11:50 AM
silver lab's Avatar
silver lab silver lab is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Stuck between wmu 110, 302 & 305
Posts: 1,023
Default

With work being so busy and lots of sausage and moose meat from last year I didn't even buy a licence this year. With what little time I had, I spent that time helping others with there tags.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-26-2017, 11:57 AM
Lefty-Canuck's Avatar
Lefty-Canuck Lefty-Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Look behind you :)
Posts: 27,774
Default

I have never been "tagged out" in 30 years of hunting...but I usually fill my freezer.

I have 2 outstanding draws this year that I likely won't fill, I could have filled one of them at least 40 times this year.

It has to do with the stages of hunting, I have moved past the "fill every tag I purchased stage". I still spend nearly $300+ on tags to offer as much opportunity as possible, filling them is another story.

I don't NEED to fill all my antlerless archery tags....in fact I never do but I have them in case I want to.

LC
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-26-2017, 02:30 PM
ex811's Avatar
ex811 ex811 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,387
Default

Can't argue with the OP's Post. Kinda where I stand.

I'm trying to teach that attitude to my Hunten buddy. It's only his 2nd year of Hunten and he's doing awesome, but, he's still in it for the thrill of the kill and to fill every possible tag.
Some hard lessons coming this week...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-26-2017, 02:37 PM
boah boah is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 863
Default

I’ve thought this for years. One problem is there are many outdoor personalities that think shooting everything you can is the goal. This influences a lot of new hunters. Saying that, I filled all my tags this year. But, I only bought 2.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-26-2017, 03:00 PM
58thecat's Avatar
58thecat 58thecat is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: At the end of the Thirsty Beaver Trail, Pinsky lake, Alberta.
Posts: 24,497
Default

Hunting will always be part of conservation...people simply know when enough is enough in an area that they hunt, don't need a biologist to pump out some game stats if your in tune to the areas you hunt, many time too many tags are issued out but if you come across an area that is over run with game animals and you choose to take a few you can always donate them to those who are in need.
Food banks etc.
__________________

Be careful when you follow the masses, sometimes the "M" is silent...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-26-2017, 03:21 PM
silver lab's Avatar
silver lab silver lab is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Stuck between wmu 110, 302 & 305
Posts: 1,023
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ex811 View Post
Can't argue with the OP's Post. Kinda where I stand.

I'm trying to teach that attitude to my Hunten buddy. It's only his 2nd year of Hunten and he's doing awesome, but, he's still in it for the thrill of the kill and to fill every possible tag.
Some hard lessons coming this week...
Haha! I remember my first couple years of hunting.... I was the same way. I think maybe we all were.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-26-2017, 03:28 PM
Lefty-Canuck's Avatar
Lefty-Canuck Lefty-Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Look behind you :)
Posts: 27,774
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 58thecat View Post
Hunting will always be part of conservation...people simply know when enough is enough in an area that they hunt, don't need a biologist to pump out some game stats if your in tune to the areas you hunt, many time too many tags are issued out but if you come across an area that is over run with game animals and you choose to take a few you can always donate them to those who are in need.
Food banks etc.
People who care decide when enough is enough. Those people are usually local to the area. Many transient folks don't care, take what they can when they can...who cares they don't live there.

I feed my family, there is no need to feed everyone else. Not everyone can hunt, that's fine by me.

LC
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-26-2017, 03:31 PM
58thecat's Avatar
58thecat 58thecat is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: At the end of the Thirsty Beaver Trail, Pinsky lake, Alberta.
Posts: 24,497
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lefty-Canuck View Post
People who care decide when enough is enough. Those people are usually local to the area. Many transient folks don't care, take what they can when they can...who cares they don't live there.

I feed my family, there is no need to feed everyone else. Not everyone can hunt, that's fine by me.

LC
Your right transients are not in tune with the area you know most, just saying if it seems over run with game taking a few to feed others, help out really does look good on the hunting community.
__________________

Be careful when you follow the masses, sometimes the "M" is silent...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-26-2017, 03:38 PM
last minute last minute is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,920
Default Fishing for something?

anyway....

Last edited by last minute; 11-26-2017 at 03:40 PM. Reason: Not worth the effort
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-26-2017, 03:39 PM
Twisted Canuck's Avatar
Twisted Canuck Twisted Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: GP AB
Posts: 16,208
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lefty-Canuck View Post
I have never been "tagged out" in 30 years of hunting...but I usually fill my freezer.

I have 2 outstanding draws this year that I likely won't fill, I could have filled one of them at least 40 times this year.

It has to do with the stages of hunting, I have moved past the "fill every tag I purchased stage". I still spend nearly $300+ on tags to offer as much opportunity as possible, filling them is another story.

I don't NEED to fill all my antlerless archery tags....in fact I never do but I have them in case I want to.

LC
This is where I'm at too (although you are probably a much better and more successful hunter than I am!). I buy tags for everything, filled zero last year and zero this year. Don't really need the meat, buying a half red Angus from friend, and the 'need' to shoot something has diminished. Could have folded a few tags over the last two years, but didn't feel like pressing that trigger and going to work. Though I did go help friends fold their tags. It would have to be something special for me at this point I think. I buy tags to subsidize conservation in AB!
__________________
'Once the monkeys learn they can vote themselves a banana, they'll never climb another tree.'. Robert Heinlein

'You can accomplish a lot more with a kind word and a gun, than with a kind word alone.' Al Capone
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-26-2017, 03:50 PM
EZM's Avatar
EZM EZM is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 11,851
Default

I'd offer that's a healthy attitude. Just because you can tag or bag more big game, birds or fish doesn't mean you need to.

I wonder how many people end up throwing out wild game, birds or fish because their freezer is overfull or you never ate what you harvested.

Seems like a shameful waste to me (and is actually illegal).

Take what you (legally) want but eat what you take.

Like the older generation where you don't often scrape half a plate full of food into the trash.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-26-2017, 03:57 PM
covey ridge's Avatar
covey ridge covey ridge is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: N. E. of High River
Posts: 4,985
Default bagging your limit

I do not think there is anything wrong with bagging your limit, but limiting your bag seems more appropriate for me.......especially with great game birds like sharp tailed grouse.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-26-2017, 04:54 PM
CF8889's Avatar
CF8889 CF8889 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 517
Default

I have some tags I won't be filling this season. Let a couple animals go I could have shot. I share a lot of meat. I enjoy giving wild meat to friends and sharing the harvest with them. One buddy, loves the stories so much and takes any meat I can give him with the upmost appreciation. If next year I fill every tag, I won't feel guilty one bit. Just means my friend will recieve a few more roasts and sausages. Of course, thinking one HAS to kill every animal possible is problematic.
__________________
Let er buck!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-26-2017, 05:05 PM
getatmewolf getatmewolf is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Brooks
Posts: 264
Default tagging out

Conservation is a by product of hunting, the areas I hunt have no shortage of deer and I don't feel bad filling tags whether they are draw or general. On the other hand I don't always fill my tags and don't feel bad about that either.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-26-2017, 05:15 PM
densa44 densa44 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: North of Cochrane
Posts: 6,648
Default A non hunter's point of view

I'm prepared to believe that there is some science to how many tags are sold. I also know that there is a calculation, even a crude one of what percentage are filled.

With all of that there will be a deer killed on hwy 12 just about everyday this winter, on my country road, we have had one already (I live in 206). I have seen 3 does standing in the road in front of my truck early in the morning last week.

So to co-exist here I don't think that we can call a guy who has a tag greedy if he shoots a deer.

I wish there had of been more shot around here.

I'm not trying to start an argument but I'm more concerned about hunters who have a tag and don't shoot because the animal doesn't meet certain criteria.

Any idea of how many deer are killed on the roads?
__________________
"The well meaning have done more damage than all the criminals in the world" Great grand father "Never impute planning where incompetence will predict the phenomenon equally well" Father
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-26-2017, 05:19 PM
hal53's Avatar
hal53 hal53 is offline
Gone Hunting
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lougheed,Ab.
Posts: 12,736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by densa44 View Post
I'm prepared to believe that there is some science to how many tags are sold. I also know that there is a calculation, even a crude one of what percentage are filled.

With all of that there will be a deer killed on hwy 12 just about everyday this winter, on my country road, we have had one already (I live in 206). I have seen 3 does standing in the road in front of my truck early in the morning last week.

So to co-exist here I don't think that we can call a guy who has a tag greedy if he shoots a deer.

I wish there had of been more shot around here.

I'm not trying to start an argument but I'm more concerned about hunters who have a tag and don't shoot because the animal doesn't meet certain criteria.

Any idea of how many deer are killed on the roads?
Why would you be concerned about a hunter choosing not to shoot a particular deer ?
__________________
The future ain't what it used to be - Yogi Berra
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-26-2017, 05:19 PM
Smokinyotes Smokinyotes is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: onoway, Ab
Posts: 6,956
Default

I put a whole beef in the freezer (840lbs) in May. My son shot a moose in october and we put half that in the freezer. Between my son and my daughters boyfriend we go through a pile of meat. As far as filling every tag, those days are over. I will not shoot a deer unless its bigger than the last one. Needless to say ive only shot 3 whitetail bucks in the last 10years.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-26-2017, 05:25 PM
cowmanbob cowmanbob is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,560
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hal53 View Post
Why would you be concerned about a hunter choosing not to shoot a particular deer ?
I'd also like to know.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-26-2017, 05:27 PM
densa44 densa44 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: North of Cochrane
Posts: 6,648
Default Not shooting answer

I'm pretty sure the biologists don't have lots of money to spend on estimating the harvest of deer based on the number of tags sold. If some hunters who buy a tag will only shoot certain animals, does that effect the way the total harvest is calculated?

Maybe it would only apply to to the draws.

Do all the general wt get filled? I don't think that they do around here.
__________________
"The well meaning have done more damage than all the criminals in the world" Great grand father "Never impute planning where incompetence will predict the phenomenon equally well" Father
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 11-26-2017, 05:52 PM
play.soccer play.soccer is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 933
Default

It's like the Facebook group.

Whitetail x2 , mule deer, bear, elk and moose to top it off

"Hey guys what a great season!!"
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-26-2017, 06:16 PM
Bushrat's Avatar
Bushrat Bushrat is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 6,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by densa44 View Post
I'm pretty sure the biologists don't have lots of money to spend on estimating the harvest of deer based on the number of tags sold. If some hunters who buy a tag will only shoot certain animals, does that effect the way the total harvest is calculated?

Maybe it would only apply to to the draws.

Do all the general wt get filled? I don't think that they do around here.
Biologists are supposed to have a general idea of how many animals are in an area, know how many can be taken out, they also have a general idea of success rates on general tags and draw tags, if they want 300 deer taken out of the area and know the success rate is 50% they will issue 600 tags. That's how its supposed to work but I don't think they have the budget for flying and doing counts or enough people in the field to get a good handle on populations these days so things definitely can get skewed alright. Then there are the guys who won't report what they shoot on the harvest surveys, yet they will be the first ones to complain there is no animals and too many tags or there are too many animals and no tags.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-26-2017, 06:17 PM
slopeshunter's Avatar
slopeshunter slopeshunter is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,210
Default

I think like Lefty said, there’s stages in hunting. Most of us go through them. Nothing wrong with it.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-26-2017, 06:51 PM
HunterDave HunterDave is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Copperhead Road, Morinville
Posts: 19,290
Default

Some people were never taught the golden rule of hunting growing up.

“Take only what you need and leave the rest.”
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-26-2017, 06:57 PM
Bushrat's Avatar
Bushrat Bushrat is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 6,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by densa44 View Post

I'm not trying to start an argument but I'm more concerned about hunters who have a tag and don't shoot because the animal doesn't meet certain criteria.

Any idea of how many deer are killed on the roads?
You shouldn't be concerned about those selective hunters who have a tag and don't shoot, these are mostly experienced hunters who spend more time in the field than the average hunter and see lots of game and turn down many opportunities to harvest game. It's mostly guys looking to tag out on trophy animals. I guess you could consider myself one of them. I haven't shot anything in 15 years though I could have filled all my deer tags every year if I had wanted, that would have been 45 legal whitetails, I never took a single animal. The few if any deer or animals selective trophy hunters take are mature and have had many years to breed and spread their genes, usually don't have many years left. The argument that taking the trophy bucks out hurts the gene pool is poppycock, that trophy buck spread the same genes when he was a younger small antlered buck breeding does as he did when he was a trophy buck. Contrary to popular belief the largest bucks don't do all the breeding nor have time to breed all the does, they actually only breed a small percentage of does and while they are busy tending one doe there are lots of smaller bucks breeding the other does that are receptive for that 24 hour period that they are open. People who shoot smaller bucks and look down on trophy hunters should realize that forkhorn they shot was a potential trophy buck if given a few more years to live and grow big antlers. Nothing wrong with shooting whatever deer is legal at all, you have my blessings, just don't look down your nose at trophy hunters for being selective when meat hunters prematurely kill more of what would end up being trophy deer than trophy hunters do.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-26-2017, 07:02 PM
Supergrit Supergrit is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,002
Default

If shoot elk then I won’t shoot a moose One or the other and then it’s white tail deer for fun usually looking for a nice buck that I still never found. I shot and elk and moose once in the same season never waisted it but it was pointless gave most of it away. Then four years ago I shot a moose and went out for deer and had legal bull elk in front of me I let him walk. The OP is bang on.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-26-2017, 07:05 PM
Lefty-Canuck's Avatar
Lefty-Canuck Lefty-Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Look behind you :)
Posts: 27,774
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bushrat View Post
You shouldn't be concerned about those selective hunters who have a tag and don't shoot, these are mostly experienced hunters who spend more time in the field than the average hunter and see lots of game and turn down many opportunities to harvest game. It's mostly guys looking to tag out on trophy animals. I guess you could consider myself one of them. I haven't shot anything in 15 years though I could have filled all my deer tags every year if I had wanted, that would have been 45 legal whitetails, I never took a single animal. The few if any deer or animals selective trophy hunters take are mature and have had many years to breed and spread their genes, usually don't have many years left. The argument that taking the trophy bucks out hurts the gene pool is poppycock, that trophy buck spread the same genes when he was a younger small antlered buck breeding does as he did when he was a trophy buck. Contrary to popular belief the largest bucks don't do all the breeding nor have time to breed all the does, they actually only breed a small percentage of does and while they are busy tending one doe there are lots of smaller bucks breeding the other does that are receptive for that 24 hour period that they are open. People who shoot smaller bucks and look down on trophy hunters should realize that forkhorn they shot was a potential trophy buck if given a few more years to live and grow big antlers. Nothing wrong with shooting whatever deer is legal at all, you have my blessings, just don't look down your nose at trophy hunters for being selective when meat hunters prematurely kill more of what would end up being trophy deer than trophy hunters do.
Exactly, a deers genes are the same the day it dies as the day it was born. BUT in order to spread those genes they need to at least make the age of maturity and breed some does

My favorite argument is folks who are sad they don't see any large mature deer but hammer small bucks year after year. The big ones come from little ones, shoot what you want legally but realize your actions have consequences.

LC
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-26-2017, 07:10 PM
Slicktricker Slicktricker is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,338
Default

I used to fill all my tags if giving the chance, past 2 weeks I've passed on some great whitetails but have mule deer and elk in freezer, will be first year I haven't filled whitetail tag in 16 years
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-26-2017, 07:13 PM
walking buffalo's Avatar
walking buffalo walking buffalo is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,207
Default

Welcome to the new Improved Alberta where not filling your tags will mean that the Outfitters will get more licences.

The proposed "Opportunity" based licence allocation system....
__________________
Alberta Fish and Wildlife Outdoor Recreation Policy -

"to identify very rare, scarce or special forms of fish and wildlife outdoor recreation opportunities and to ensure that access to these opportunities continues to be available to all Albertans."
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-26-2017, 07:15 PM
Scottmisfits Scottmisfits is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,109
Default

My freezer is mostly full. I got two deer this year. However, I am hoping for, but realistically won’t get out, for one more. I really want my sone to get his deer this year, his first year hunting. I don’t care if I get another one at all.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.