It’s one of those first world problems, so I’m not going to be overly dramatic here.
Perhaps this post will save someone from making a more expansive mistake? I’ve purchased a rifle from Kelvin’s Taxidermy & Gun Store out of Nova Scotia.
It was described as being in “excellent” condition and that was confirmed by the storeowner via separate email before I paid for everything (along with the shipping costs). Communication was excellent and the package arrived quickly. Packaging was also great and I would be a happy client if not for one thing. The rifle in question wasn’t even near of being in “excellent” condition as described in the sale ad. Let’s look what “excellent” condition actually is according to NRA grading scheme that is typically used by the sellers here.
EXCELLENT: New condition, used but little, no noticeable marring of wood or metal, bluing perfect, (except at muzzle or sharp edges).
Well, this is what I actually received from Kelvin’s Taxidermy & Gun Store:
Obviously "excellent" isn't the right word to describe its condition. "Good" would be much more accurate. My email to the store that was sent on Tuesday July 27th expressing my disappointment and inquiring why this rifle was described as it was (along with the same pictures that you can see above) remains unanswered to this day, despite the fact that previously our communication was VERY quick and efficient.
In the end I was planning to change a lot on this rifle anyway, so I’ll fix most of these issues myself and keep it (which I explained in my email to the store from 27th as well). It's in good working condition. However…I would advise you to be very careful when dealing with this store and request for the detailed pictures of any item that you are planning to purchase from them may be a good idea.
It seems that integrity there is in short supply. Cheers!