Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-17-2021, 05:08 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 40,865
Default RCMP Officer Charged For Using Service Firearms Off Duty

https://www.canadapolicereport.ca/20...V8ZRmNC9t9q0pk

Our range and others have already put rules in place that prohibit anyone including law enforcement from using prohibited firearms on our ranges, except when law enforcement has the range booked for official police activities.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-17-2021, 05:33 PM
alacringa's Avatar
alacringa alacringa is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: With my dogs
Posts: 4,536
Default

He should have known better. I wonder what the RCMP will decide to do with him once he has processed through the courts.
__________________
alacringa

"This Brittany is my most cherished possession — the darndest bird-finder I have ever seen, a tough and wiry little dog with a choke-bored nose and the ability to read birds’ minds." -Jack O'Connor
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-17-2021, 06:41 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 40,865
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alacringa View Post
He should have known better. I wonder what the RCMP will decide to do with him once he has processed through the courts.
He isn't the only one , we have had to ask a few off duty officers to remover their service firearms from our range.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-17-2021, 07:10 PM
Smokinyotes Smokinyotes is online now
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: onoway, Ab
Posts: 5,503
Default

He is a cop so I would imagine he will probably get off because most of them are above the law.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-17-2021, 07:43 PM
tikka250's Avatar
tikka250 tikka250 is online now
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: East
Posts: 1,822
Default

Never knew that was not allowed. Should send this to the gentleman I know who has taken his service pistol to gravel pits
__________________
HOLD ON FUR!

life's too short to fish nymphs
Trail cameras and drones aren't the only thing ruining hunting, lazy People are really inovative.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-17-2021, 07:54 PM
normanrd's Avatar
normanrd normanrd is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: whitecourt
Posts: 1,295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smokinyotes View Post
He is a cop so I would imagine he will probably get off because most of them are above the law.
Exactly. Am I the only one who thinks that being "suspended with pay" while under a criminal investigation or awaiting court is a load of b.s.? It's like a paid vacay while you wait to be bailed out by your buddies.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-17-2021, 08:05 PM
antmai antmai is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Here, not there
Posts: 462
Default

Still blows my mind how the majority of police services do not require even a PAL for their members.
But in the end, I am sure this RC's feelings were hurt and shame on any court, panel or board that may hold a level of accountability on the infraction.
__________________
The two most important days in your life are the day you are born and the day you find out why. ~Mark Twain
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-17-2021, 08:15 PM
Savage Bacon's Avatar
Savage Bacon Savage Bacon is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Calgary-Red Deer area
Posts: 1,487
Default

Using over capacity magazines also. Do rcmp officers even use over capacity magazines?
__________________
I'm not really a licensed bodyman or heavy duty mechanic. I just play one at work.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-17-2021, 08:23 PM
barsik barsik is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: boyle,ab
Posts: 556
Default

that's totally stupid. the law as it is written forbids officers to go to the range while off duty with the very same firearms they strap on while on duty? what moron added that to the criminal code? forgive me if any members here are offended by my rant.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-17-2021, 08:59 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 40,865
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barsik View Post
that's totally stupid. the law as it is written forbids officers to go to the range while off duty with the very same firearms they strap on while on duty? what moron added that to the criminal code? forgive me if any members here are offended by my rant.
I can tell you why our range, and many others don't allow officers to use their service firearms outside of official police bookings. When people without uniforms do magazine dumps of 20 rounds or more, they attract attention and our members complain . Then the executive has to investigate the complaints, in case illegal activities are taking place at our facility. If we allow illegal activities on our premises, the CFO can revoke our range approvals, and shut us down.We are all volunteers, and having to investigate these complaints takes time, and then we have to report back to the unhappy members that complained, that the people they reported are police using their service firearms. And that takes more time that we don't want to waste, and still leaves other members unhappy.
So to avoid all of this hassle, we just enact rules that prohibit anyone from using prohibited firearms on our ranges, with the exception of law enforcement, during law enforcement range bookings.
So even if it was legal for off duty officers to shoot their service firearms on a range, we won't allow it on our range, and neither will many other ranges.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-17-2021, 10:55 PM
Headdamage Headdamage is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 696
Default

Just West of Edmonton in the early 90's an RCMP officer used his service weapon to kill a Whitetail deer and then loaded it into the trunk of his patrol car. This was not an injured deer it was him doing some opportunistic harvesting. He got some desk duty or something when it came to light, nothing more.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-17-2021, 11:00 PM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 36,397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barsik View Post
that's totally stupid. the law as it is written forbids officers to go to the range while off duty with the very same firearms they strap on while on duty? what moron added that to the criminal code? forgive me if any members here are offended by my rant.
Many of the firearms PEO's use are actually illegal for Civilians, and many LEO's in Canada do not have an RPAL to begin with.
When an officer is off duty , he must abide by the the law, although many do not.
if they are on our range they must be in uniform and authorized by their duty RSO, as in training or testing.
Some really stupid and unsafe stunts were cause buy the RCMP at our range in years past, some off duty and some on duty.
This resulted in our banning them from our range for a number of years unless they were members as civilians and it caused a big riff between them and us.
Since then, their RSO as well as their attitude have changed , and we once again have a very good relationship with them.
Cat
__________________
" And then there's Neil Young- I'm certain there's a few loose strings on THAT guitar!"
Rex Murphy
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-18-2021, 11:15 AM
troutbug's Avatar
troutbug troutbug is online now
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Bush
Posts: 2,684
Default Strathmore officer facing gun charges

Interesting, I would like to hear what type of firearms he had exactly? Funny how they have no issue naming rifles' "assault rifles" and such whenever guns make it in the news but are fairly quiet when it is one of there own.

https://strathmorenow.com/stories/st...WvzURwwClSCSHA
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-18-2021, 11:42 AM
Cement Bench's Avatar
Cement Bench Cement Bench is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: alberta
Posts: 1,407
Default

hope he goes to jail, as he and most of his buddies would charge you faster than rifle lock time
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-18-2021, 11:49 AM
58thecat's Avatar
58thecat 58thecat is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: At the end of the Thirsty Beaver Trail, Pinsky lake, Alberta.
Posts: 21,002
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cement Bench View Post
hope he goes to jail, as he and most of his buddies would charge you faster than rifle lock time
he will get his day in court like we would too
__________________

Be careful when you follow the masses, sometimes the "M" is silent...
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-18-2021, 11:57 AM
58thecat's Avatar
58thecat 58thecat is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: At the end of the Thirsty Beaver Trail, Pinsky lake, Alberta.
Posts: 21,002
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
I can tell you why our range, and many others don't allow officers to use their service firearms outside of official police bookings. When people without uniforms do magazine dumps of 20 rounds or more, they attract attention and our members complain . Then the executive has to investigate the complaints, in case illegal activities are taking place at our facility. If we allow illegal activities on our premises, the CFO can revoke our range approvals, and shut us down.We are all volunteers, and having to investigate these complaints takes time, and then we have to report back to the unhappy members that complained, that the people they reported are police using their service firearms. And that takes more time that we don't want to waste, and still leaves other members unhappy.
So to avoid all of this hassle, we just enact rules that prohibit anyone from using prohibited firearms on our ranges, with the exception of law enforcement, during law enforcement range bookings.
So even if it was legal for off duty officers to shoot their service firearms on a range, we won't allow it on our range, and neither will many other ranges.


That’s fair enough equality for all.

This fella will get his day in court and then do the hatless dance in front of his superiors too....man I remember the stuff we use to do during my army days and wow when the hammer came down it was not pleasant hard lessons learnt
__________________

Be careful when you follow the masses, sometimes the "M" is silent...
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-18-2021, 01:26 PM
heybert heybert is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Md of Foothills
Posts: 1,499
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutbug View Post
Interesting, I would like to hear what type of firearms he had exactly? Funny how they have no issue naming rifles' "assault rifles" and such whenever guns make it in the news but are fairly quiet when it is one of there own.

https://strathmorenow.com/stories/st...WvzURwwClSCSHA
If it’s their issued firearm, it would be a S&W 5946. Mag, I believe, carries 15.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-18-2021, 04:17 PM
urban rednek's Avatar
urban rednek urban rednek is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 2,395
Wink Someone had to be first

Quote:
Originally Posted by heybert View Post
If it’s their issued firearm, it would be a S&W 5946. Mag, I believe, carries 15.
Based on the charges, he was using the carbine. The OIC they are committed to enforcing put their carbines on the prohibited list.
It's convenient that he stepped up to be made an example of.

Quote:
Following an investigation, the officer was charged with Possession of a Firearm While Unauthorized, Possession of a Prohibited Firearm, and Possession of a Prohibited Device (over-capacity magazine)
__________________
“One of the sad signs of our times is that we have demonized those who produce, subsidized those who refuse to produce, and canonized those who complain.” - Thomas Sowell

“We seem to be getting closer and closer to a situation where nobody is responsible for what they did but we are all responsible for what somebody else did.”- Thomas Sowell
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-18-2021, 04:26 PM
heybert heybert is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Md of Foothills
Posts: 1,499
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by urban rednek View Post
Based on the charges, he was using the carbine. The OIC they are committed to enforcing put their carbines on the prohibited list.
It's convenient that he stepped up to be made an example of.
A 5946 is also prohibited since it has a 4” barrel, plus a high cap mag. If he doesn’t have a 12.6 like us old guys, then he is also unauthorized.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-18-2021, 04:49 PM
mediumrare mediumrare is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 234
Default

Suspended with pay.life is tough
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 09-18-2021, 04:55 PM
trigger7mm trigger7mm is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,147
Default Strathmore

Quote:
Originally Posted by mediumrare View Post
Suspended with pay.life is tough
No kidding. Time to go hunting!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-18-2021, 06:10 PM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 36,397
Default

Here is Runkle's take on it, very interesting.
Now in case people are wondering WHY the RCMP and Military personal do not require and RPAL is because they do regular qualifications with their firearms as well as their initial firearms training.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pN9h0yTZgU
Cat
__________________
" And then there's Neil Young- I'm certain there's a few loose strings on THAT guitar!"
Rex Murphy
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-18-2021, 06:20 PM
Bushrat's Avatar
Bushrat Bushrat is online now
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 6,240
Default

In an ideal world he wouldn't be getting charged with anything as there would be no restrictions against what he did and he would be able to shoot with us with our restricted guns at any gravel pit or makeshift gun range or crown land since they wouldn't be restricted either.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-18-2021, 06:25 PM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 36,397
Default

It's in the guns and ammo forum as well.
Cat
http://www.outdoorsmenforum.ca/showthread.php?t=403361
__________________
" And then there's Neil Young- I'm certain there's a few loose strings on THAT guitar!"
Rex Murphy
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-18-2021, 06:27 PM
urban rednek's Avatar
urban rednek urban rednek is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 2,395
Exclamation Let's be really clear about this

Quote:
Originally Posted by catnthehat View Post
Now in case people are wondering WHY the RCMP and Military personal do not require and RPAL is because they do regular qualifications with their firearms as well as their initial firearms training.
Cat
The reason that LEO's and Military personnel do not require an RPAL is that a considerable percentage of them could not pass the regular security checks that are applied to civilians with an RPAL. Concerns that would cause the CFO to forfeit your RPAL do not apply to them.
This is simply their way to get around the rules.
__________________
“One of the sad signs of our times is that we have demonized those who produce, subsidized those who refuse to produce, and canonized those who complain.” - Thomas Sowell

“We seem to be getting closer and closer to a situation where nobody is responsible for what they did but we are all responsible for what somebody else did.”- Thomas Sowell
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-18-2021, 06:36 PM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 36,397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by urban rednek View Post
The reason that LEO's and Military personnel do not require an RPAL is that a considerable percentage of them could not pass the regular security checks that are applied to civilians with an RPAL. Concerns that would cause the CFO to forfeit your RPAL do not apply to them.
This is simply their way to get around the rules.
That is about the biggest load of BS I have seen here for a while!
Cat
__________________
" And then there's Neil Young- I'm certain there's a few loose strings on THAT guitar!"
Rex Murphy
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-18-2021, 06:50 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 40,865
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bushrat View Post
In an ideal world he wouldn't be getting charged with anything as there would be no restrictions against what he did and he would be able to shoot with us with our restricted guns at any gravel pit or makeshift gun range or crown land since they wouldn't be restricted either.
Exactly, unfortunately common sense was not considered when our Canadian firearms regulations were drafted. Having the RCMP caught up the stupidity is ironic, but not a bad thing to happen.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.

Last edited by elkhunter11; 09-18-2021 at 07:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-18-2021, 07:07 PM
urban rednek's Avatar
urban rednek urban rednek is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 2,395
Question This has been well known for a long time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by catnthehat View Post
That is about the biggest load of BS I have seen here for a while!
Cat
You are entitled to your opinion, doesn't mean you're right.

LEO's and other first responders are statistically more likely to suffer Behavioural Health Concerns than the general population. Health concerns that could cause the forfeiture of a PAL/RPAL without the professional courtesy that is afforded their position.

As for military personnel? Same, but with even more off-base violence.
__________________
“One of the sad signs of our times is that we have demonized those who produce, subsidized those who refuse to produce, and canonized those who complain.” - Thomas Sowell

“We seem to be getting closer and closer to a situation where nobody is responsible for what they did but we are all responsible for what somebody else did.”- Thomas Sowell
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-18-2021, 07:10 PM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 36,397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by urban rednek View Post
You are entitled to your opinion, doesn't mean you're right.

LEO's and other first responders are statistically more likely to suffer Behavioural Health Concerns than the general population. Health concerns that could cause the forfeiture of a PAL/RPAL without the professional courtesy that is afforded their position.

As for military personnel? Same, but with even more off-base violence.
And do you think for a second that every civilian out there is stable enough to hold a PAL?
After doing RSO duties for many years , I have come to the conclusion that the number of responsible firearms owners are drastically outnumbered by those who should never be near them.
The number of unstable construction workers I know that have mental issues far exceeds what most people would consider " normal", in fact it amazes the number of nut bars that actually HAVE current RPALs!
Cat
__________________
" And then there's Neil Young- I'm certain there's a few loose strings on THAT guitar!"
Rex Murphy
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 09-18-2021, 08:24 PM
thumper's Avatar
thumper thumper is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Canmore
Posts: 4,261
Default

Do LEOs require a Drivers License ? Or does their motor vehicle job training exempt them of that requirement too ?
__________________
The world is changed by your action, not by your opinion.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.