Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-13-2013, 03:00 PM
MooseHuntr MooseHuntr is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 56
Default Load density

My 243 win loaded with a 95 gr nosler bt behind around 41 grains of H4350 gives me roughly 80% load density. 2.710" oal
This load is accurate and am happy with it and not wanting to switch powders.
My question is, is there any type of filler I can use to increase the load density to keep as much of the powder against the primer. I've read a pinch of toilet paper works as a filler ??
Should I even be worried about it ? Is using a filler a dumb idea.
Any information or advise would be appreciated, thanks for your time.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-13-2013, 03:32 PM
Salavee Salavee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Parkland County, AB
Posts: 4,253
Default

If you are happy with that load, go with it. Nothing wrong with 80% density if it is shooting well. If you do try a powder change, try Varget
__________________
When applied by competent people with the right intent, common sense goes a long way.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-13-2013, 03:36 PM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,576
Default

You won't gain any accuracy using 80% density and a filler.
I would do some testing wit diffetrent overal lengths in .010 increments, shorter and longer, to see which length is more accurate.
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-13-2013, 05:02 PM
MooseHuntr MooseHuntr is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 56
Default

I had an error in my first post, it should of said 90% load density NOT 80%. I didn't catch that earlier.
Thanks for reply's
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-13-2013, 05:51 PM
tchardy1972 tchardy1972 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nacmine
Posts: 2,286
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Salavee View Post
If you are happy with that load, go with it. Nothing wrong with 80% density if it is shooting well. If you do try a powder change, try Varget
Varget is a faster burning powder, therefore will not fill as much of the case as 4350. You could try h-1000. That should fill her up.
__________________
Proud To Be A Volunteer Fire Fighter.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-13-2013, 06:32 PM
260 Rem 260 Rem is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: East Central Alberta
Posts: 8,315
Default

90% full is fine and will give you a consistent burn. I generally try for 90+% fill but seldom compress.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-13-2013, 10:02 PM
bdub's Avatar
bdub bdub is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,713
Default

This thread got me wondering about shooting on a steep vertical angle downhill if there would be any effect due to a gap between the primer and the powder on loads that were say 80 percent case capacity? Would the small gap between the powder and the primer change anything? Do I over think stuff? Hmmm. Interesting.
__________________
There are some who can live without wild things, and some who cannot. Aldo Leopold
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-14-2013, 05:58 AM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,576
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bdub View Post
This thread got me wondering about shooting on a steep vertical angle downhill if there would be any effect due to a gap between the primer and the powder on loads that were say 80 percent case capacity? Would the small gap between the powder and the primer change anything? Do I over think stuff? Hmmm. Interesting.
You won't see any issues that will effect the accuracy of an 80% load of 4350 in the 243.
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-14-2013, 06:25 AM
silver silver is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Maidstone Sask
Posts: 2,794
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bdub View Post
This thread got me wondering about shooting on a steep vertical angle downhill if there would be any effect due to a gap between the primer and the powder on loads that were say 80 percent case capacity? Would the small gap between the powder and the primer change anything? Do I over think stuff? Hmmm. Interesting.
I wouldn't think the ignition would be that much different, more of a problem would be your holdover in that situation.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.