Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

View Poll Results: A BULLET TO PASS THROUGH OR NOT IS BEST
PASS THROUGH IS BEST 86 60.14%
NON-PASS THROUGH IS BEST 57 39.86%
Voters: 143. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 08-26-2012, 07:35 PM
gitrdun gitrdun is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: High River, AB
Posts: 10,788
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hal53 View Post
sounds good...LOL...where do I sign up???......
Pm an address, I'll send the scrapbooking details. Guns? I don't wanna talk about it, twas a brain fart.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 08-27-2012, 06:47 AM
209x50's Avatar
209x50 209x50 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lefty-Canuck View Post
On an inhale the diaphram moves backwards as the lungs fill....on exhale it moves forward. All the gushy parts in side will move slightly as well.

I don't think it is anything to be stuck on....more something to consider....just remember if you think you nailed a shot and you find some gut in the chest cavity when you are dressing the animal....this could be the cause

LC
I really think you should have a better understanding of how a diaphragm helps us breath and anatomy in general before you continue to repeat such stories. Organs don't slosh around in us or critters for instance. I'll say this your Dad was quick with an imaginative excuse for a poor shot.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 08-27-2012, 08:09 AM
duceman duceman is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: south of calgary
Posts: 1,830
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HunterDave View Post
I know a guy that got a moose with a pellet gun like that. When he put his head under water to eat he shot him in the nuts and the moose drowned when he sucked in all of that water. The pellet was a hollow point.
that is without a doubt the best post on this forum! thanks dave, lee
__________________
220swifty

1. People who list their arguments in bullets points or numerical order generally come off as condescending pecker heads.

2. #1 is true.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 08-27-2012, 08:48 AM
cal33 cal33 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 132
Default

Pass through. Never a guarantee of instant kill and I want a blood trail. Not interested in killing without recovery. That was the thing with the old. 30-30, never instant kills but great blood trails. Almost had to be careful not to get any on ya! Now my. 338 for everything. Usually instant kills but if not, always a great blood trail, deer, bear or moose.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 08-27-2012, 10:09 PM
209x50's Avatar
209x50 209x50 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HunterDave View Post
I know a guy that got a moose with a pellet gun like that. When he put his head under water to eat he shot him in the nuts and the moose drowned when he sucked in all of that water. The pellet was a hollow point.
A better question was why didn't he just shoot into the water? With the mooses head underwater the "hydrostatic shock" would have killed him instantly right? Right? .....
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 08-27-2012, 10:17 PM
Cowtown guy's Avatar
Cowtown guy Cowtown guy is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 4,658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 209x50 View Post
A better question was why didn't he just shoot into the water? With the mooses head underwater the "hydrostatic shock" would have killed him instantly right? Right? .....
Hahaha! Thats good. I love it.
__________________
"The Internet doesnt make you stupid, it just makes your stupidity more accessible to others." Huntinstuff 2011
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 08-27-2012, 10:37 PM
rem338win's Avatar
rem338win rem338win is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cowtown, agian
Posts: 2,812
Default

I tend to avoid the hydrostatic whack crowd like lepers and crabs. It just doesnt make any sense when facts and science is applied.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 08-27-2012, 10:40 PM
Lefty-Canuck's Avatar
Lefty-Canuck Lefty-Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Look behind you :)
Posts: 27,775
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 209x50 View Post
I really think you should have a better understanding of how a diaphragm helps us breath and anatomy in general before you continue to repeat such stories. Organs don't slosh around in us or critters for instance. I'll say this your Dad was quick with an imaginative excuse for a poor shot.
Yet another intelligent response....why don't you explain all knowing one

I know they don't slosh....I never said they did. The diaphram moves throughout the process of breathing. Are you saying the diaphrams does not move at all during the breathing process?

I know my Father knows quite a lot about anatomy actually.

Yet again attacking one of my posts...I figured you might have a bit more class than that....but I guess not.

LC
__________________

Last edited by Lefty-Canuck; 08-27-2012 at 11:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 08-28-2012, 06:01 AM
209x50's Avatar
209x50 209x50 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lefty-Canuck View Post
Yet another intelligent response....why don't you explain all knowing one

I know they don't slosh....I never said they did. The diaphram moves throughout the process of breathing. Are you saying the diaphrams does not move at all during the breathing process?

I know my Father knows quite a lot about anatomy actually.

Yet again attacking one of my posts...I figured you might have a bit more class than that....but I guess not.

LC
Just trying to help you understand. Check into how a diapfhram works. Have you ever gutted an animal? I wouldn't expect such statements from someone who gutted their own animals.
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 08-28-2012, 07:52 AM
Lefty-Canuck's Avatar
Lefty-Canuck Lefty-Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Look behind you :)
Posts: 27,775
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 209x50 View Post
Just trying to help you understand. Check into how a diapfhram works. Have you ever gutted an animal? I wouldn't expect such statements from someone who gutted their own animals.
You know the diaphram is a muscle that expands and contracts?...and actually has a certain amount of movement...in a human it moves up and down and in 4 legged beasts it moves laterally back and forth....it doesn't move a lot but it does move...

Read this...first two paragraphs...you might learn something.
http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/heal...athappens.html

Of course I have gutted my own critters, why do you have to talk down to people?...Have you?.... and my Father was a butcher...what are you getting at?.... Just say it...

You may have a differing opinion to mine...and you weren't there when the statement was made, nor did you see the results of the shot and the placement...no need for you to be so condescending though...

LC
__________________

Last edited by Lefty-Canuck; 08-28-2012 at 08:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #71  
Old 08-28-2012, 09:01 AM
sheephunter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lefty-canuck View Post
something to keep in mind....

One of the main reasons that the copper solids are used over in africa is that the ph's want to always have an exit....that way they can get their trackers on a animal if they are not able to recover it quickly....most places will make you pay for an animal whether you recover it or not. So if you shoot a zebra and they know you hit it and you do not recover it.....you pay for a zebra.

Lc
lol.......
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 08-28-2012, 09:12 AM
sheephunter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lefty-Canuck View Post
On an inhale the diaphram moves backwards as the lungs fill....on exhale it moves forward. All the gushy parts in side will move slightly as well.

I don't think it is anything to be stuck on....more something to consider....just remember if you think you nailed a shot and you find some gut in the chest cavity when you are dressing the animal....this could be the cause

LC
I think the only problem with that theory LC is that the Diaphragm acts as a vaccum seal basically. Puncture it and the lungs have a very hard time inflating and you end up with equal pressure in the chest and gut cavities. It would be impossible for gut to get sucked into the chest cavity. If you have gut in the chest cavity, it's because the bullet pushed it there, likely from a hard quartering away shot. The liver and stomach actually sits next to the diaphragm, neither of those are going to get sucked into the chest cavity....blown in by a bullet but not sucked in.

You are correct that the diaphragm is a muscle and has some slight movement but never enough to alter shot placement depending on the breathing cycle. My Dad told me some whopper stories as a kid too...that's what Dads do.

If the theory were true though, it would make a great arguement for the high shoulder shot
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 08-28-2012, 09:14 AM
PistonBroke's Avatar
PistonBroke PistonBroke is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 437
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheephunter View Post
I think the only problem with that theory LC is that the Diaphragm acts as a vaccum seal basically. Puncture it and the lungs have a very hard time inflating and you end up with equal pressure in the chest and gut cavities. It would be impossible for gut to get sucked into the chest cavity. If you have gut in the chest cavity, it's because the bullet pushed it there, likely from a hard quartering away shot. The liver and stomach actually sits next to the diaphragm, neither of those are going to get sucked into the chest cavity....blown in by a bullet but not sucked in.

You are correct that the diaphragm is a muscle andb has some s

light movement but never enough to alter shot placement depending on the breathing cycle. My Dad told m,me some whopper stories as a kid too...that's what Dads do.

If the theory were true though, it would make a great arguement for the high shoulder shot
X2 well said ,makes scence to me
__________________
My friend thinks he is smart, he said that onions are the only food to make you cry , so I threw a coconut at his face !!!!

If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything. (Mark twain)

if you don't have the time to do it right now,
how you gonna find time to do it right later !!!!!
(truck window)
quote
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 08-28-2012, 09:15 AM
sheephunter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

As to the OP, give me a bullet that expands fast to a roughly 2x diameter and retains its weight and I'm a happy camper on North American game. Sometimes it will pass through and other times it won't but it will always make a big permanent wound channel and a temporary wound channel as well. If I were hunting dangerous game in Africa where the need to break through heavy bone to acheive maximum penetration were required, then a solid may indeed be a better option.
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 08-28-2012, 10:45 AM
Canuck Bob's Avatar
Canuck Bob Canuck Bob is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 464
Default

I like a big bore bullet of sturdy construction. My 444 gives me that. I also prefer a double hole blood trail. It is neither right or wrong. It suits my style. I usually hunt with a rifle that has excess power because of the days when a guy might shot a deer or maybe a moose out for the day.

I tried a 7MM Mag for bigger game and a 243 for deer and had good results but the meat loss was significant.
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 08-28-2012, 11:06 AM
Mike_W's Avatar
Mike_W Mike_W is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Stony Plain
Posts: 6,433
Default

Pass through here the hydrostatic shock is still there just with an exit hole.

Piston broke you seem like you think you know a lot about bullets but in the few posts you have made about them it's obvious you don't know as much as you think you do..... Listen to people here with an open mind ..... Could really help... Asking a poll question with such a solid view already seem pointless!!
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 08-28-2012, 11:43 AM
Jamie Black R/T's Avatar
Jamie Black R/T Jamie Black R/T is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,818
Default

damaged lungs or heart...or both with a hole on either side is best....two holes for the blood to run out of and leave me a trail.

shockwave killing animals is a myth. a hole in the vitals is what kills them.

Elk11 is bang on.
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 08-28-2012, 12:10 PM
PistonBroke's Avatar
PistonBroke PistonBroke is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 437
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike_W View Post
Pass through here the hydrostatic shock is still there just with an exit hole.

Piston broke you seem like you think you know a lot about bullets but in the few posts you have made about them it's obvious you don't know as much as you think you do..... Listen to people here with an open mind ..... Could really help... Asking a poll question with such a solid view already seem pointless!!
Lmao, good one I'm not saying much for a reason
I wanna see what others think , I never made this
Poll for me , I did it for YOU guys
__________________
My friend thinks he is smart, he said that onions are the only food to make you cry , so I threw a coconut at his face !!!!

If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything. (Mark twain)

if you don't have the time to do it right now,
how you gonna find time to do it right later !!!!!
(truck window)
quote
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 08-28-2012, 12:33 PM
nekred nekred is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,772
Default

So many variables with terminal ballistics....

Did bullet pass through because it failed to expand.... probably not a good thing...

Did bullet stay in far side of hide because it did not expand and calibre was too small for it to make it through?

Did bullet exit because it expanded late.... and waste energy outside of animal....

Did bullet not exit because it expanded too fast?

PERFECT world is where bullet starts expanding immediattely upon enetring animal is able to shear through bone without stopping or fragmenting and has enough energy to make it all the way to far side of animal before finally petering out leaving a wave of hydrostatic destrucion in its wake....

Rarely are we in perfect world....

Try to make a 300 wsm 180 grain bullet stay inside a deer without a shouler hit.... or have a 223 bullet pass through an elk while expanding....

I have seen many situations that were less than ideal. I saw a moose hit witha 300 Win Mag at 30 yards that entered the moose and fragmented in the longs and actually dislocated the shoulders creating huge internal blood shock and was not noticed until there was a horrible stench after hanging for 3 days....both shoulders were lost. Yet that bullet did not exit....

Seen a moose killed with a 243 where bullet went through the heart and expanded and yet exited and moose dropped in its tracks....

Seen a deer hit with a 300 win mag at 500+ yards that dropped in its tracks but bullet on expanded enogh to take far lung out (was hanging on tree 30 yards behind the deer....yet no meat wasted!....

Another time a quartering to deer hit with a 243 that hit spine and bullet travelled along spine and out the hind end and completely ruined the meat in the deer... and deer dropped in his tracks....

All I can say is sometimes too much energy and sometimes too little.... it needs to be applied in the right spot. However having too much energy will results in a humane kill more often than too little...it just all depends on how much meat you want to consume.

All these variables ca be taken into consideration and there are many opinions on these variables as well and if there were not we would not have the bullet, and calibre selection discussions that we can all learn from....

I think that all things considered that two holes means you erred on the side of caution and had more energy than required... better than not enough...
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 08-28-2012, 12:36 PM
sheephunter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Energy has never killed an animal...it's pure an absolute bunk. Energy allows a bullet to do its work, nothing more. If that bullet is designed properly and there is suffucient energy to allow it to expand and penetrate...things die. Two bullets, depending on construction, can do very different amounts of work with the same amount of energy. Energy basically means nothing with modern bullets......provided there is enough to allow them to do their work.
Reply With Quote
  #81  
Old 08-28-2012, 12:48 PM
PistonBroke's Avatar
PistonBroke PistonBroke is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 437
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nekred View Post
So many variables with terminal ballistics....

Did bullet pass through because it failed to expand.... probably not a good thing...

Did bullet stay in far side of hide because it did not expand and calibre was too small for it to make it through?

Did bullet exit because it expanded late.... and waste energy outside of animal....

Did bullet not exit because it expanded too fast?

PERFECT world is where bullet starts expanding immediattely upon enetring animal is able to shear through bone without stopping or fragmenting and has enough energy to make it all the way to far side of animal before finally petering out leaving a wave of hydrostatic destrucion in its wake....

Rarely are we in perfect world....

Try to make a 300 wsm 180 grain bullet stay inside a deer without a shouler hit.... or have a 223 bullet pass through an elk while expanding....

I have seen many situations that were less than ideal. I saw a moose hit witha 300 Win Mag at 30 yards that entered the moose and fragmented in the longs and actually dislocated the shoulders creating huge internal blood shock and was not noticed until there was a horrible stench after hanging for 3 days....both shoulders were lost. Yet that bullet did not exit....

Seen a moose killed with a 243 where bullet went through the heart and expanded and yet exited and moose dropped in its tracks....

Seen a deer hit with a 300 win mag at 500+ yards that dropped in its tracks but bullet on expanded enogh to take far lung out (was hanging on tree 30 yards behind the deer....yet no meat wasted!....

Another time a quartering to deer hit with a 243 that hit spine and bullet travelled along spine and out the hind end and completely ruined the meat in the deer... and deer dropped in his tracks....

All I can say is sometimes too much energy and sometimes too little.... it needs to be applied in the right spot. However having too much energy will results in a humane kill more often than too little...it just all depends on how much meat you want to consume.

All these variables ca be taken into consideration and there are many opinions on these variables as well and if there were not we would not have the bullet, and calibre selection discussions that we can all learn from....

I think that all things considered that two holes means you erred on the side of caution and had more energy than required... better than not enough...
X2. Well done sir well done , bravo , I mean this
Sincerely to
__________________
My friend thinks he is smart, he said that onions are the only food to make you cry , so I threw a coconut at his face !!!!

If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything. (Mark twain)

if you don't have the time to do it right now,
how you gonna find time to do it right later !!!!!
(truck window)
quote
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 08-28-2012, 12:50 PM
PistonBroke's Avatar
PistonBroke PistonBroke is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 437
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheephunter View Post
Energy has never killed an animal...it's pure an absolute bunk. Energy allows a bullet to do its work, nothing more. If that bullet is designed properly and there is suffucient energy to allow it to expand and penetrate...things die. Two bullets, depending on construction, can do very different amounts of work with the same amount of energy. Energy basically means nothing with modern bullets......provided there is enough to allow them to do their work.
So let's try and stay on track to what the OP
Had originally posted , let's try that lol
__________________
My friend thinks he is smart, he said that onions are the only food to make you cry , so I threw a coconut at his face !!!!

If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything. (Mark twain)

if you don't have the time to do it right now,
how you gonna find time to do it right later !!!!!
(truck window)
quote
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 08-28-2012, 12:53 PM
sheephunter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PistonBroke View Post
So let's try and stay on track to what the OP
Had originally posted , let's try that lol
No sure how this isn't on topic if we are trying to understand bullet performance...most people have a very poor understanding of how bullets actually work and subsequent damage they cause....regardless if they pass through or not. Your original post is a classic example of that. It is filled with very flawed conclusions.
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 08-28-2012, 12:59 PM
209x50's Avatar
209x50 209x50 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lefty-Canuck View Post
You know the diaphram is a muscle that expands and contracts?...and actually has a certain amount of movement...in a human it moves up and down and in 4 legged beasts it moves laterally back and forth....it doesn't move a lot but it does move...

Read this...first two paragraphs...you might learn something.
http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/heal...athappens.html

Of course I have gutted my own critters, why do you have to talk down to people?...Have you?.... and my Father was a butcher...what are you getting at?.... Just say it...

You may have a differing opinion to mine...and you weren't there when the statement was made, nor did you see the results of the shot and the placement...no need for you to be so condescending though...

LC
No condescation intended. If you feel inferior that wasn't my fault. I thought you were puiling a gag on every one.
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 08-28-2012, 01:02 PM
PistonBroke's Avatar
PistonBroke PistonBroke is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 437
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheephunter View Post
No sure how this isn't on topic if we are trying to understand bullet performance...most people have a very poor understanding of how bullets actually work and subsequent damage they cause....regardless if they pass through or not. Your original post is a classic example of that. It is filled with very flawed conclusions.
well do what you can with the OP then i guess, IT IS VERY ENTERTAINING and knowledgeable to ....
__________________
My friend thinks he is smart, he said that onions are the only food to make you cry , so I threw a coconut at his face !!!!

If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything. (Mark twain)

if you don't have the time to do it right now,
how you gonna find time to do it right later !!!!!
(truck window)
quote
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 08-28-2012, 01:23 PM
Lefty-Canuck's Avatar
Lefty-Canuck Lefty-Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Look behind you :)
Posts: 27,775
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 209x50 View Post
No condescation intended. If you feel inferior that wasn't my fault. I thought you were puiling a gag on every one.
Pick and choose Rich...pick and choose.

Feel inferior to who? You?....yah that's it. That's the biggest gag in this thread. Thanks for yet another stellar contribution...

LC
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 08-28-2012, 01:37 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 44,842
Default

Quote:
So let's try and stay on track to what the OP
Had originally posted , let's try that lol
The OP simply asks whether one hole ot two are preferred, which in itself is pretty much meaningless, if you don't consider what the bullet does while it's inside the animal. As such, all discussion on what the bullet does while inside the animal is quite relevent to the topic. However, seeing as how flawed your understanding appears to be of just how bullets kill, I can certainly understand why you would want to avoid discussion of this type.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 08-28-2012, 02:43 PM
duffy4 duffy4 is offline
Gone Hunting
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Rocky Mountain House
Posts: 5,219
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheephunter View Post
Energy has never killed an animal...it's pure an absolute bunk. Energy allows a bullet to do its work, nothing more. If that bullet is designed properly and there is suffucient energy to allow it to expand and penetrate...things die. Two bullets, depending on construction, can do very different amounts of work with the same amount of energy. Energy basically means nothing with modern bullets......provided there is enough to allow them to do their work.

After doing some reading on "bullet energy, hydrostatic shock" I would not say "it's pure an absolute bunk". Sheep, where do you get your view that it is so?
__________________
Robin,

Archery Sept. 1 - Oct. 31 Muzzleloader and Crossbow Oct. 1 - Oct. 31 Rifle Nov. 25 - Nov. 30


...And HIS kingdom shall have no end...
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 08-28-2012, 02:45 PM
sheephunter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by duffy4 View Post
After doing some reading on "bullet energy, hydrostatic shock" I would not say "it's pure an absolute bunk". Sheep, where do you get your view that it is so?
A ton of research, common sense and real world experience.
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 08-28-2012, 03:04 PM
nekred nekred is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,772
Default

It is the unleashing of energy that creates the harm.....

It is how that energy is unleashed.... If I hit you with a 5,000,000 lb weight very slowly but laterally it will move you with very little harm, put the ground under you and lower at same speed and you will die!....

Bullets transfer their mechanical kinetic energy and that is how they kill. they transfer the energy into little tiny bags of water that make up tissue (cells) and they cannot contain the energy and breaks the cell membranes destroying the tissue and interrupting its function. This has been coined as "hydrostaic shock" but is really a strong hydraulic force being applied in a very focused zone creating traum and destruction. The degree of damage is a function of available energy to be transfered and the efficiency of the transfer mechanism. Thus an expanding bullet increases surface area of transfer and changes the damage column from being long and skinny to shorter and larger diameter. in the end the same volume is affected.

Another factor that determines amount of damage is the target substrrate, bone, cartilage, flech, muscle also has an effect.

So in order to maximise damage... increase available energy, use the right expansion rate to dmage the tissue according to substrate, and maximise the column of destruction....

But ensure this column of destruction damages vital organ tissue to create a humane kill.

So on a small animal once that column of destruction extends beyond the available tissue to damge it is wasted.... or if the animal is built where the damage column is too broad and not deep enough to reach vital tissue it is an issue as well.

In the end it is the maximisation of the size of the damage column and the placement of it where it can work on the most vital tissue is important.

A 22 calibre bullet to the brainstem is as lethal as a 300 WM to the heart... Hard to argue which makes an animal more dead.... in the end having a 300 WM to the brainstem is more destructive but not anymore lethal.... just more tissue damaged and a higher probability of a kill with less than perfect shot...

Dead is dead!....
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.