Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Trapping Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-03-2014, 05:29 PM
Bushmonkey Bushmonkey is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 636
Default advise on a trapping sled

Looking into a sled for trapping. I can't buy new, so I'm looking at used under 4500$.

I know I want fan cooled, long wide track, 2 stroke

It's tough going through kijiji looking for decent sleds. Most that seem like they might be ok are touring models like Polaris touring from the 90's or skidoo touring from around 1999-2002.

I know the tundra's, skandic's, bear cat's, vikings are ideal, but what other make/model/year would do ok?

Anyone looking to get rid of a trapping sled please shoot me a pm as well.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-03-2014, 07:47 PM
jim summit's Avatar
jim summit jim summit is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Birch Mt to Fort Vermilion
Posts: 937
Default

The Ski doo 1996 and up 380/500 Touring are good, same as the 380 Skandic except for 42" ski stance vs Skandic 37". Seen some turn over 20,000km.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-03-2014, 09:29 PM
Bushmonkey Bushmonkey is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 636
Default

I keep reading the touring sleds have problems breaking trail and in deep snow. I might have a 2001 skidoo touring 500 I can grab, but I read reviews and it seems bad in deep snow. Guy's on sledding forums say stick to trails for touring or you'll get stuck. Are they too heavy?

Are you saying the 37 inch stance is better or worse? I rode a sled with narrow ski's a few times and it was more tippy then I could tolerate in any snow over 1 foot. Got stuck all the time cause the sled would flop and I had to slow down, than got stuck when I tried to get momentum again.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-03-2014, 09:31 PM
Bushmonkey Bushmonkey is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 636
Default

I suppose if I swap out the narrow ski's on touring models to much wider ones that would help a lot?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-03-2014, 09:53 PM
nube nube is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: In a house
Posts: 7,770
Default

Might be a silly question but what makes a good trapping sled and why?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-03-2014, 10:20 PM
Bushmonkey Bushmonkey is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 636
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nube View Post
Might be a silly question but what makes a good trapping sled and why?
Kinda what I'm asking lol..

from my sledding experience

-want to keep the weight down so you don't sink when you start/start/ go over deep snow

-fan cooled. Reason being liquid cooled don't do well (over heat) unless there is constand snow being thrown into the heat exchangers. It's how the sled stays cool. Unless your going in deep snow, you need speed to kick the snow up into the heat exchangers. So chugging along and not getting snow into the exchangers will cause you to over heat. A lot of trapping is chugging along. If you are starting and stopping a lot, you need to turn a liquid cooled machine off or it has potenail to over heat.

-fan cooled are a little bit lighter than liquid. No weight from coolant, rad etc..

-long wide track and ski's for floatation.

-bigger engines can't be cooled with a fan so most big engine's are liquid. And big engines weigh more. So thats my understanding of most trapping sleds are under 500 cc's.

-big cc's engines use more gas. It's better to have a fuel efficient sled so you don't have to pack as much gas

-very reliable lol.. can't be screwing around with repairs when your alone in the middle of your line. My understanding is fan cooled are easier to fix and tent to be more reliable. And they can get high mileage with not many isses.
To me being relaible means they should be designed with simplicity in mind.

-2 strokes are lighter than 4's, so most trapping sleds are 2 stroke.

I know new sleds are designed different and what I am saying only applies to what I know. Which is older sleds.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-03-2014, 11:42 PM
jim summit's Avatar
jim summit jim summit is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Birch Mt to Fort Vermilion
Posts: 937
Default

The 37" stance is still not tippy and can sqeeze down narrow trails. The Tundra has only 32" stance, tippy in deep snow, but very manuverable.

Trapping sled for me is air cool, hot air blowing to warm hands, face. Long track with rack to haul cargo, big windsheild for cold days. Not to wide, cut a narrow trail and most weekend snowmobilers can't follow.
Tundra 300 single cyl engine is super on gas, use the 550 Tundra if i'm hauling freight. Sled needs to be simple, electric and pull start is nice, in cause one fails.
Wide skis are nice, keeps the nose up when breaking new trail.

Have an hour meter on the 300, ave use on the line for a 6 hr day is 2 liters per hr. 550 burns more the twice that same usage.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-05-2014, 08:51 AM
G_Godberson G_Godberson is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 147
Default

Yamaha,s ... Have owned 3 -starting with old Bravo,s which are unbelievably low maintenance . Only issue was steering linkage freezing occasionally. Newest yammer hammer is VK540 (Viking) ... Wide, long track- good storage under seat, low geared for pulling. Enticer II from 90's was good sled too

New Tundras sound hard to work on, and tippy. Got too fancy for a work sled I think
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-05-2014, 08:54 AM
G_Godberson G_Godberson is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 147
Default

For VK 540 ... In fairness , should mention that ski,s can torpedo in snow and hang up... May need to get more of a curved ski tip to solve problem
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-05-2014, 09:00 AM
ruger300's Avatar
ruger300 ruger300 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 507
Default

New Tundras sound hard to work on, and tippy. Got too fancy for a work sled I think[/QUOTE]

Lots of panels and stuff to take off to get to engine, Yeah, miss the old two hold down straps and lift the hood and everything is right there.

ruger300
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-05-2014, 09:25 AM
McLeod Valley McLeod Valley is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: McLeod Valley
Posts: 436
Default

I've got 4 ,, 1 Bravo long track , 1 Tundra , one Bear Cat , and a 377 Safari , they all have good and bad qualities , this year this year none of them are any good !!!! But the one that seems to weather this 4 feet of baseless powders the best is the Tundra ll .
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-05-2014, 10:09 AM
Bushmonkey Bushmonkey is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 636
Default

Thanks for the input..

It's very aggravating trying to find something on kijiji. I've found a few, but since I am a few hours away from a city and need a day to pick them up, they are gone before I can convince the seller to take a EMT of half the sled and I'll pick it up the next day with the other half.

Missed a good polaris wide track yesterday...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-05-2014, 10:52 AM
gtr gtr is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 1,529
Default

Isn't such a thing as a good polaris.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-05-2014, 07:10 PM
herc herc is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 232
Default

I have the Yamaha VK540. Great wide track. Good storage. Fuel consumption is pretty good. Not the lightest sled but movable if you get stuck. If you find one for $4500 and in good condition... i would highly recommend it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.