Wow.
EZM
You need to learn how to use
bold. That is your first lesson. Bold is like caps-lock. Caps-lock is like shouting. Politicians and maniacs have a carte-blanche on shouting---a smart person can tune them out. Let’s focus on your shouting. I would like to give you the benefit of the doubt that you are neither a politician nor a maniac.
Quote:
Originally Posted by EZM
As far as I'm concerned there is zero added risk in using a proper fluorocarbon leader material with proper swivels and snaps versus titanium…. I have never lost a pike using fluorocarbon leaders
|
You do not understand how risk works. Risk is based a set of parameters and possible outcomes. While I have also never lost a fish using fluoro leaders, many of my friends have. You do not add risk by making a choice. You acquire a different set of risks vs rewards. Let’s think this through.
Empirical evidence shows that pike cannot bite through titanium/steel leaders.
Empirical evidence shows that pike
can bite through fluoro/mono leaders. However, fluoro is difficult to see, but not impossible. As the leader material gets thicker, it becomes more visible.
In the risks vs rewards scenarios, it is could be more likely to catch more pike use a straight fluoro leader over a titanium leader, but titanium leaders will not be severed from a bite.
Quote:
Originally Posted by EZM
and frankly ..... I call BS ..... Fluorocarbon leader is absolutely the best product you can use and is superior in every way.
|
It is clearly not superior in every way. Sure, there are advantages. There is no way a pike will bite through a modern 25lb titanium leader. Anything less than 40lb fluoro leader material is at risk of being severed by pike. This statement, in its present form, is false.
Quote:
Originally Posted by EZM
To each his own. But after trying both - I will never use steel or titanium for pike or musky again. Absolutely going backwards in technology and giving up significant advantages if I do.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EZM
The way to look at it, in my opinion is simple ...... use a 80lb fluorocarbon leader and you won't have bite throughs. The 80lb flouro is still thinner and are more supple compared to any steel or titanium leader of equal test strength .... not to mention all the other benefits of fluoro.
|
First of all, this is so utterly untrue.
Actually, nickel titanium alloy leader material is more technologically advanced over fluorocarbon. NiTi leader is
significantly smaller than equal weight test fluoro leader material. New NiTi leader material is supple enough to tie. Without a micrometer, it is hard to tell, but 40lb NiTi is about the same diameter as 20lb fluoro line (not leader material, which is thicker and stiffer than running line). Search Knot2Kinky.
Here is how to make the most technologically advanced leader for pike which uses both titanium bite material as well as fluorocarbon leader.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dgBx0vjr6mg
It is not critical to use much NiTi. I use about 10-20 cm (i.e.about the width of the mouth biggest pike that you expect to catch if it completely misses the book). A 10 kg pike has about 20 cm bite width.
On my fly rod, I use 15 cm Knot2Kinky bite tippet to a 1.2m 20kg fluorocarbon leader. Use a perfection loop knot at the end to the leader for the loop-to-loop connection to the fly line. I like the Mustad Fastach size 1 clips for the terminal tackle because it easily passes through the rod guides for pack up. The Mustad clip is the break point in this system.
On my spin rod, I use 15 cm Knot2Kinky to 2m 15kg fluorocarbon leader. Using an Albright knot, I tie the fluorocarbon leader to 20kg braid. Again, I use the Mustad Fastach size 1 clips for the terminal tackle. With this set up, there is no swivels or bumps. Using knots, the line/leader can easily pass through rod guides and collects nicely on the reel when it is time to pack up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by EZM
..... BUT it's not invisible under water
|
We all like BUTS, we cannot lie. You other anglers can’t deny…
Fluoro is not invisible. The reason why fluoro is harder to see is because its index of refraction is close to water, but it is not the same. As the line/leader diameter gets bigger, it becomes more visible. Here is something that all fly anglers know...pike are NOT leader-shy, especially compared to trout.
I believe the small amount of glint from 10cm of titanium bite tipped will serve as an attractant over being a deterrent. With the set up I describe above, you get the protection of the wire, and the stealth of smaller diameter fluoro.
This fall with a fishing trip to Northern Sask, with my fly rod and the setup explained above, I easily outfished the other 4 guys using gear. The only hooks I have lost were due to epic snags on Canadian shield rocks. Because my fly line is 20lb, I would expect to lose a few hooks---the breakpoint is at the snap.
Quote:
Originally Posted by EZM
Might as well tie my shoe laces together and enter a race.
|
Here is how shoes work…
Shoes come in pairs. Most people need one for each foot. Each shoe has its own laces. You tie the 2 laces from the left shoe to each other. Likewise, you tie the two laces from the right shoe together. I would recommend tying your laces together before entering any sort of running or walking race.