Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 04-30-2020, 10:52 PM
MOAhunter MOAhunter is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 186
Default The transitions

Started using a borrowed 270 Win.
Got a free .308 Win. Sold it
Bought 338WM. Sold it
Got a 7mm RM and shot nearly all my game with it.
Recently bought my son a 7-08 and it's really sweet to shoot! If I am able to shoot it more accurately offhand than my 7mmRM I just might get another one or maybe a 260 or 6.5CM for myself.
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 05-01-2020, 03:08 AM
Ranger CS Ranger CS is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Pincher Creek
Posts: 921
Default Recoil Comparison

Caliber (Bullet weight&velocity) Rifle Weight, Recoil Energy,Recoil Velocity

.308 Win. (165 at 2700) 7.5 18.1 12.5
.30-06 Spfd. (165 at 2900) 8.0 20.1 12.7
.30-06 Spfd. (180 at 2700) 8.0 20.3 12.8
7mm Rem. Mag. (160 at 2950) 9.0 20.3 12.0

The above Rifle Recoil Table was published by By Chuck Hawks comparing recoil energy and recoil velocity by caliber, rifle weight and bullet weight.
For those who think the 308 and 30-06 have significantly less recoil than the 7mm Rem. Mag. have a look and think again before giving up your magnums.
__________________
Ranger
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 05-01-2020, 10:37 AM
Stinky Coyote Stinky Coyote is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,189
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ranger CS View Post
Caliber (Bullet weight&velocity) Rifle Weight, Recoil Energy,Recoil Velocity

.308 Win. (165 at 2700) 7.5 18.1 12.5
.30-06 Spfd. (165 at 2900) 8.0 20.1 12.7
.30-06 Spfd. (180 at 2700) 8.0 20.3 12.8
7mm Rem. Mag. (160 at 2950) 9.0 20.3 12.0

The above Rifle Recoil Table was published by By Chuck Hawks comparing recoil energy and recoil velocity by caliber, rifle weight and bullet weight.
For those who think the 308 and 30-06 have significantly less recoil than the 7mm Rem. Mag. have a look and think again before giving up your magnums.
there's different recoils to consider, some are more sensitive to the inertia recoil from the weight of the bullets, some the speed of the recoil...for example, i've always disliked the recoil of every 30 cal i've shot, 308's included but shoot a .270 with 140's/130's all day doesn't bother me, even enjoy 7rm's with 140's better, there are others who are the opposite, they prefer the shove of the slower heavier bullets vs the sharper snap of the faster lighter stuff

my simple view is i've never been happy pushing 150 grains or more of lead down the pipe as i am 140 grains or less, the velocity doesn't seem to matter as much as the weight of the bullet does (within the typical standard/magnum velocity ranges)

my take on it
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 05-01-2020, 10:59 AM
sillyak sillyak is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lacombe, AB
Posts: 1,404
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ranger CS View Post
Caliber (Bullet weight&velocity) Rifle Weight, Recoil Energy,Recoil Velocity

.308 Win. (165 at 2700) 7.5 18.1 12.5
.30-06 Spfd. (165 at 2900) 8.0 20.1 12.7
.30-06 Spfd. (180 at 2700) 8.0 20.3 12.8
7mm Rem. Mag. (160 at 2950) 9.0 20.3 12.0

The above Rifle Recoil Table was published by By Chuck Hawks comparing recoil energy and recoil velocity by caliber, rifle weight and bullet weight.
For those who think the 308 and 30-06 have significantly less recoil than the 7mm Rem. Mag. have a look and think again before giving up your magnums.

Best to run the numbers yourself. Notice the 7mmRM is in a 9 lb rifle and the .308 is 7.5 lbs.

But yeah it's not a huge difference, it is a fair amount faster though.

I used to have a 7.8 lb rifle that sent a 500 grain TSX at 2450 fps for 116 ft•lb of recoil energy. Makes the 7mm RM vs .308 recoil debate meaningless.
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 05-01-2020, 01:01 PM
Ranger CS Ranger CS is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Pincher Creek
Posts: 921
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stinky Coyote View Post
there's different recoils to consider, some are more sensitive to the inertia recoil from the weight of the bullets, some the speed of the recoil...for example, i've always disliked the recoil of every 30 cal i've shot, 308's included but shoot a .270 with 140's/130's all day doesn't bother me, even enjoy 7rm's with 140's better, there are others who are the opposite, they prefer the shove of the slower heavier bullets vs the sharper snap of the faster lighter stuff

my simple view is i've never been happy pushing 150 grains or more of lead down the pipe as i am 140 grains or less, the velocity doesn't seem to matter as much as the weight of the bullet does (within the typical standard/magnum velocity ranges)

my take on it
That's why you need to consider recoil velocity along with recoil energy. For sure the weight of the rifle is significant. Increase the gun weight by, say, 25% and the recoil goes down by 25%, basic physics.
__________________
Ranger
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 05-01-2020, 01:59 PM
Battle Rat Battle Rat is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,636
Default

I wonder if those that kill deer with a 25-20 trash talk guys that hunt with that huge 25-06.
__________________
Thank you front line workers and volunteers
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 05-01-2020, 06:07 PM
Ram94's Avatar
Ram94 Ram94 is online now
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Northeast Alberta
Posts: 188
Default How many have left the magnums behind for something smaller

I recently went from 7RM to a 7mm-08 that’s 2 lbs lighter. My take on it, is the 08 will push the same 162gr. bullet with enough energy inside of 500 yards to cleanly kill all species in Alberta. I shoot it more accurately than my 7RM and I have a smaller/lighter/handier rifle to tote around.

Beyond 500 is where the magnum shines though. (I won’t shoot at an animal beyond that anyways, but I can see the benefit for guys that have the skills to do so)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 05-01-2020, 06:38 PM
marky_mark marky_mark is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,700
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sillyak View Post
Best to run the numbers yourself. Notice the 7mmRM is in a 9 lb rifle and the .308 is 7.5 lbs.

But yeah it's not a huge difference, it is a fair amount faster though.

I used to have a 7.8 lb rifle that sent a 500 grain TSX at 2450 fps for 116 ft•lb of recoil energy. Makes the 7mm RM vs .308 recoil debate meaningless.
What caliber/rifle was that??
Sounds interesting
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 05-01-2020, 06:40 PM
Dean2's Avatar
Dean2 Dean2 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Near Edmonton
Posts: 15,361
Default

[QUOTE=marky_mark;4161817]What caliber/rifle

Must be a 460 Weatherby at that speed and weight. Very light rifle for that cartridge. Mine has a custom made brake and weights at least 3 pounds more and it is still very lively in the recoil department.

Last edited by Dean2; 05-01-2020 at 06:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 05-01-2020, 06:58 PM
marky_mark marky_mark is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,700
Default

[QUOTE=Dean2;4161820]
Quote:
Originally Posted by marky_mark View Post
What caliber/rifle

Must be a 460 Weatherby at that speed and weight. Very light rifle for that cartridge.
Was thinking a double
My 378 wby was heavier than that
Made you smile when you pulled the trigger lol
Reply With Quote
  #101  
Old 05-01-2020, 07:00 PM
Dean2's Avatar
Dean2 Dean2 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Near Edmonton
Posts: 15,361
Default

[QUOTE=marky_mark;4161833]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean2 View Post

Was thinking a double
My 378 wby was heavier than that
Made you smile when you pulled the trigger lol
Most doubles are at least ten pounds. Many are 12. Never seen a big bore douvle under 9 pounds.
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 05-01-2020, 08:11 PM
Ranger CS Ranger CS is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Pincher Creek
Posts: 921
Default

According to the Barnes website the only 500 gr. TSX bullet they make is for a 470 Nitro.

The published recoil table shows the following:
.470 N.E. (500 at 2150) 11.0 69.3 20.1
That is 69.3 ft.lbs. of recoil energy, a hair under the 116 ft.lbs referred to above.
__________________
Ranger

Last edited by Ranger CS; 05-01-2020 at 08:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 05-01-2020, 08:22 PM
Dean2's Avatar
Dean2 Dean2 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Near Edmonton
Posts: 15,361
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ranger CS View Post
According to the Barnes website the only 500 gr. TSX bullet they make is for a 470 Nitro.

The published recoil table shows the following:
.470 N.E. (500 at 2150) 11.0 69.3 20.1
That is 69.3 ft.lbs. of recoil energy, a hair under the 116 ft.lbs referred to above.
They make a 500 grain 458 TSX for the 460, 458 win etc. I have a bunch loaded for my 46O bee. The 116 pounds of recoil in a 8 pound rifle is pretty close to right for a 460. To get one from the factory without a brake u used to have to sign a waiver. They have been known to detach retinas and produce concussions unbraked.
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 05-01-2020, 08:52 PM
Ranger CS Ranger CS is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Pincher Creek
Posts: 921
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean2 View Post
They make a 500 grain 458 TSX for the 460, 458 win etc. I have a bunch loaded for my 46O bee. The 116 pounds of recoil in a 8 pound rifle is pretty close to right for a 460. To get one from the factory without a brake u used to have to sign a waiver. They have been known to detach retinas and produce concussions unbraked.
That's nasty! Never shot anything with that much energy.
__________________
Ranger
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 05-01-2020, 09:50 PM
NayNay's Avatar
NayNay NayNay is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Rimbey
Posts: 866
Default

I now only use .243win, 7mm-08, and 6.5 Creedmoor. I hate recoil.
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 05-02-2020, 09:54 AM
marky_mark marky_mark is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,700
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean2 View Post
They make a 500 grain 458 TSX for the 460, 458 win etc. I have a bunch loaded for my 46O bee. The 116 pounds of recoil in a 8 pound rifle is pretty close to right for a 460. To get one from the factory without a brake u used to have to sign a waiver. They have been known to detach retinas and produce concussions unbraked.
That would be impressive
Gophers wouldn’t have a chance
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 05-02-2020, 10:36 AM
Dean2's Avatar
Dean2 Dean2 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Near Edmonton
Posts: 15,361
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marky_mark View Post
That would be impressive
Gophers wouldn’t have a chance
I have shot quite a few things with that Boomer, nothing so far had much of a chance. Funny thing is, the excessive power doesn't seem to damage more meat but it also doesn't seem to kill any faster. I have shot a ton of bears with a 45-70, which is a 350 grain bullet at 1700 FPS versus the same 350 out of the Bee at 2800 and the ones shot with the 45-70 died just as fast. The bullet went clear though every time with the 45-70, so they were already going lots fast enough. Both guns are a blast with cast bullets though you do have to slow the 460 down to about 1800 fps so you don't get severe leading. Trail Boss works great for cast loads in the 460 Bee and actually makes it lots of fun to plink with.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.