Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 03-02-2010, 09:11 AM
glen d. glen d. is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 215
Default

In a New Western Republic, no government supported ethnic, special interest groups, languages or cultures would be supported with tax dollars. Only performance by merit will be rewarded through direct free market competition. Business reputations would be crucial to their survival. This will create an automatic cleansing effect on corruption from the system.


We the english,the majority, the voting majority did not have a vote on the official lanquage act.
  #62  
Old 03-02-2010, 09:18 AM
Okotokian's Avatar
Okotokian Okotokian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
Default

Man, you really picked the wrong time to advocate the break-up of our great country. I've got no time for traitors.
  #63  
Old 03-02-2010, 09:20 AM
Matt L.'s Avatar
Matt L. Matt L. is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Whitecourt
Posts: 5,818
Default

Me either, somebody's got a major burr under his saddle and I hope it gives him saddle-sores!
  #64  
Old 03-02-2010, 07:07 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,503
Default

Quote:
Man, you really picked the wrong time to advocate the break-up of our great country. I've got no time for traitors
Then you should have no time for Quebec,after all,49.5% of the voters voted to separate from Canada.
  #65  
Old 03-02-2010, 07:44 PM
guywiththemule guywiththemule is online now
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,604
Default Traitors....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Okotokian View Post
Man, you really picked the wrong time to advocate the break-up of our great country. I've got no time for traitors.
Maybe you and Matt should head back "east" where everybody(Quebec and Ottawa) has more time and money for traitors and you would feel more at home !
  #66  
Old 03-02-2010, 08:29 PM
PoppaW's Avatar
PoppaW PoppaW is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Peace River, Alberta
Posts: 1,420
Default

As I watched the olympics all I could think was why so much French being spoken on tv
__________________
Everybody is allowed an opinion, even if it's wrong.

WOODY
CSSA NFAMember
  #67  
Old 03-02-2010, 10:42 PM
glen d. glen d. is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 215
Default

It is clear that Francophones make up a small percentage of the population outside Quebec, yet they demand equal status with the majority. And in Quebec, they demand that English be relegated to a 2nd class language. Unfortunately, the loser in this fight to impose the French language on Canadians is likely to be Canadian unity itself. For the first time the mainstream media is speaking out on the language issue, particulary in the context of the Olympics, where Western Canadians are rightfully dismayed that their noses have been rubbed in the federal muck of "Quebec appeasement" once again.


We the english,the majority, the voting majority did not have a vote on the official lanquage act.
  #68  
Old 03-02-2010, 11:17 PM
Matt L.'s Avatar
Matt L. Matt L. is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Whitecourt
Posts: 5,818
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by guywiththemule View Post
Maybe you and Matt should head back "east" where everybody(Quebec and Ottawa) has more time and money for traitors and you would feel more at home !
Why the hell would I feel more at home?
Oh, and glenn, French and English (in that order) just happen to be the official languages of the Olympics. Nothing at all to do with Quebec.
  #69  
Old 03-03-2010, 07:09 AM
roadkill roadkill is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,755
Default

So, anyone who doesn't automatically agree with a separate country should just go away? Wow, how will things be when all those Chinese and Shikhs I mentioned start angling for language rights? Will they have to move out as well? Sounds like a pretty dark republic to me.

And fer gossakes, the Olympics have been dealt with enough. As I and others have said, the Olympics have two official languages, which have to be used at ever games. It's not about Quebec.

Man... Is it me, or is only one side of this whole mess actually listening?
__________________
roadkill

Probably the only English-speaking, French-Canadian lefty greeniac in Montréal with a 2008 Winchester M70 in .270. Probably.
  #70  
Old 03-03-2010, 07:33 AM
Bushrat's Avatar
Bushrat Bushrat is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 6,957
Default

Give or take a hundred years or so from now french and english won't be an issue, we will all be speaking Arabic. Given we already recognize two official languages other minorities will/already are, demand that their language be officially recognized. Being that french and english are not reproducing enough to sustain our numbers and other minorities are reproducing exponentially this argument will be mute. If the french don't like dealing with the english when we already recognize their cultural and historical differences, think how they/we will feel when we have to deal with the muslems when they take over Quebec and the rest of Canada. I think a country should lock down one official language and stick to it or we will lose it, make everyone coming here learn it and stop pandering to every minorities wish as this will backfire on us both. Look at what having two official languages has already done to this country and the cultural divide it has and continues to create. We need to look at the bigger picture of the future and stop squabbling over a language issue and focus on what this country is turning into and which direction it is headed. Bilingualism divides, multiculture polarises society at a time when we need unity, this language issue is the last thing we should be worried about at this time.

Last edited by Bushrat; 03-03-2010 at 07:40 AM.
  #71  
Old 03-03-2010, 08:17 AM
glen d. glen d. is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 215
Default

I have a question for you forced bilinqual supporters.

When the Federal government brought in the official lanquage act should it not been voted on by Canadians.
  #72  
Old 03-03-2010, 08:41 AM
glen d. glen d. is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 215
Default

In the new Western Republic ....

Culture will be determined by the people naturally - original and unique (not copied or legitimized with taxpayers money - coercion).

Culture will be left alone to evolve naturally through the people. Private business allowed to flourish, unfettered by government in a capitalist society will result in benevolent unified population of traders. No favoritism (funding or assistance of any kind) by government will be allowed which would result in a fractured society. Statism (Socialism or Fascism) stifles creativity and incentive. Capitalism is the catalyst for invention and it is the only moral social system by which man should live.

Moral responsibility and strong core values would return due to renewed enthusiasm and hope - enhanced survival instinct resulting in a thriving nation with self-reliant citizens.
  #73  
Old 03-03-2010, 09:16 AM
Okotokian's Avatar
Okotokian Okotokian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by guywiththemule View Post
Maybe you and Matt should head back "east" where everybody(Quebec and Ottawa) has more time and money for traitors and you would feel more at home !
I've lived my whole life in Alberta. And I'm a proud Canadian. Language arguments apart, anyone who advocates tearing apart my country is the enemy. Albertan seperatists are the enemy. Quebec separatists are the enemy. They fought a war over this in the US. Sorry if you and Glen get offended by the term "traitor", but in terms of Canada, that's what you are if you advocate the break-up of my country. If the shoe fits fella... Sorry I hurt your feelings. Perhaps you should go back east and get in bed with your fellow separatists in Quebec. You certainly have common cause with them. I will live in Alberta and be a Canadian my whole life.
  #74  
Old 03-03-2010, 03:01 PM
roadkill roadkill is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,755
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Okotokian View Post
I've lived my whole life in Alberta. And I'm a proud Canadian. Language arguments apart, anyone who advocates tearing apart my country is the enemy. Albertan seperatists are the enemy. Quebec separatists are the enemy. They fought a war over this in the US. Sorry if you and Glen get offended by the term "traitor", but in terms of Canada, that's what you are if you advocate the break-up of my country. If the shoe fits fella... Sorry I hurt your feelings.
I agree. What we have is far from perfect, but it's *my* favourite country, at least.
__________________
roadkill

Probably the only English-speaking, French-Canadian lefty greeniac in Montréal with a 2008 Winchester M70 in .270. Probably.
  #75  
Old 03-03-2010, 04:48 PM
Matt L.'s Avatar
Matt L. Matt L. is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Whitecourt
Posts: 5,818
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Okotokian View Post
I've lived my whole life in Alberta. And I'm a proud Canadian. Language arguments apart, anyone who advocates tearing apart my country is the enemy. Albertan seperatists are the enemy. Quebec separatists are the enemy. They fought a war over this in the US. Sorry if you and Glen get offended by the term "traitor", but in terms of Canada, that's what you are if you advocate the break-up of my country. If the shoe fits fella... Sorry I hurt your feelings. Perhaps you should go back east and get in bed with your fellow separatists in Quebec. You certainly have common cause with them. I will live in Alberta and be a Canadian my whole life.
X100! Well said Oko!
  #76  
Old 03-03-2010, 07:37 PM
guywiththemule guywiththemule is online now
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,604
Default uhh..

Quote:
Originally Posted by Okotokian View Post
I've lived my whole life in Alberta. And I'm a proud Canadian. Language arguments apart, anyone who advocates tearing apart my country is the enemy. Albertan seperatists are the enemy. Quebec separatists are the enemy. They fought a war over this in the US. Sorry if you and Glen get offended by the term "traitor", but in terms of Canada, that's what you are if you advocate the break-up of my country. If the shoe fits fella... Sorry I hurt your feelings. Perhaps you should go back east and get in bed with your fellow separatists in Quebec. You certainly have common cause with them. I will live in Alberta and be a Canadian my whole life.
Good try! Still falls a little short; Sorry ! Maybe you could try again. Just sayin.....
  #77  
Old 03-03-2010, 10:57 PM
glen d. glen d. is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 215
Default

Offended, never, keep up the good work.

We must educate and organize people interested in forming a new Independent Republic of Western Canada. The new proposed representative government constitution is based on the principle of individual rights (most notably, protected individual property rights), the pursuit of happiness, limited and accountable government structure whose only role is to protect all individuals from the initiation of force from others and therefore will uphold these individual rights by defending them against said force. In order to defend these individual rights government's role must then be limited to a strong military, police and justice system with a supreme court whose judges must be held to account by the people for any action which would not provide the protection of individuals as described therein the constitution.


We the english,the majority, the voting majority did not have a vote on the official lanquage act.
  #78  
Old 03-04-2010, 07:39 AM
roadkill roadkill is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,755
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by glen d. View Post
Offended, never, keep up the good work.

We must educate and organize people interested in forming a new Independent Republic of Western Canada. The new proposed representative government constitution is based on the principle of individual rights (most notably, protected individual property rights), the pursuit of happiness, limited and accountable government structure whose only role is to protect all individuals from the initiation of force from others and therefore will uphold these individual rights by defending them against said force. In order to defend these individual rights government's role must then be limited to a strong military, police and justice system with a supreme court whose judges must be held to account by the people for any action which would not provide the protection of individuals as described therein the constitution.


We the english,the majority, the voting majority did not have a vote on the official lanquage act.
It's clear that you're not listening to anyone who questions this republic you're trumpeting -- or anything else you're on about, for that matter. You're just using threads as soapboxes from which to sling a whole lot of total hooey about what *you* want your republic to be. You have a totally naïve view of a lot of what you're saying, and you're not even trying to counter what I said, let alone what others have. So what's the point?

And if you're going to get all up in arms about your sacred language, at least spell the word 'language' right in your signature.
__________________
roadkill

Probably the only English-speaking, French-Canadian lefty greeniac in Montréal with a 2008 Winchester M70 in .270. Probably.
  #79  
Old 03-04-2010, 08:19 AM
glen d. glen d. is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 215
Default

A province or an individual seeking independence is not treason as we found out when Quebec was seeking independence.
In seeking independence Quebec, thanks to the constitution/laws of this country was informed that they or any province can use the Clarity Act to seek their independence.
  #80  
Old 03-04-2010, 08:29 AM
glen d. glen d. is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 215
Default

The Clarity Act was created in response to the 1995 Quebec referendum and ongoing independence movement in that province. The content of the Clarity Act was based on the 1998 secession reference to the Supreme Court of Canada made by the federal government under Jean Chrétien.
  #81  
Old 03-04-2010, 08:35 AM
Okotokian's Avatar
Okotokian Okotokian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by guywiththemule View Post
Good try! Still falls a little short; Sorry ! Maybe you could try again. Just sayin.....
That's a poor substitute for a counter-argument. Vacuous. Falls a little short. Maybe you could try again. I'm just sayin'....

Next time try "Oh yeah? Well, you're STUPID!" Would be more effective.
  #82  
Old 03-04-2010, 08:48 AM
maxpower2506 maxpower2506 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 247
Default

Wow, never cease's to amaze me how many people don't mind having their collective noses rubbed in french crap! For 17 days we here in the west almost,and I MEAN, almost got a tiny bit of respect, but that is over, and all eastern Canada hates us again, ANYONE who doubts that, read a few Liberal Blogs, and then see how willing you are to maintain the status quo!
  #83  
Old 03-04-2010, 09:37 AM
Okotokian's Avatar
Okotokian Okotokian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maxpower2506 View Post
I MEAN, almost got a tiny bit of respect, but that is over, and all eastern Canada hates us again,
Though not to the extent, I suspect, of how much many of us here hate them it seems. Max, nobody hates you.

Just tired of the haters and the pseudo-victims.... all the venom being spewed by a small number of people with chips on their shoulders about the most petty things. We here chide all the "special interest groups" for taking offense at every little percieved slight against them. Look in the mirror folks. Wanting to tear a country apart because we think, rightly or wrongly, that we had to sit through a french class in school 30 years ago or a cereal box was turned with the French side out. It's sad.
  #84  
Old 03-04-2010, 11:04 AM
maxpower2506 maxpower2506 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Okotokian View Post
Though not to the extent, I suspect, of how much many of us here hate them it seems. Max, nobody hates you.

Just tired of the haters and the pseudo-victims.... all the venom being spewed by a small number of people with chips on their shoulders about the most petty things. We here chide all the "special interest groups" for taking offense at every little percieved slight against them. Look in the mirror folks. Wanting to tear a country apart because we think, rightly or wrongly, that we had to sit through a french class in school 30 years ago or a cereal box was turned with the French side out. It's sad.
I could not agree more, But it has taken a lot longer for the anger to boil to the surface here out west. Trust me, check out some of the left leaning bloggers from every province east of Manitoba, you will see what is simmering out there. I could care less what they say myself, but it does get very OLD!
  #85  
Old 03-04-2010, 11:31 AM
S.A.S S.A.S is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,179
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Okotokian View Post
I've lived my whole life in Alberta. And I'm a proud Canadian. Language arguments apart, anyone who advocates tearing apart my country is the enemy. Albertan seperatists are the enemy. Quebec separatists are the enemy. They fought a war over this in the US. Sorry if you and Glen get offended by the term "traitor", but in terms of Canada, that's what you are if you advocate the break-up of my country. If the shoe fits fella... Sorry I hurt your feelings. Perhaps you should go back east and get in bed with your fellow separatists in Quebec. You certainly have common cause with them. I will live in Alberta and be a Canadian my whole life.
So we should just keep supporting ungrateful provinces and sniveling left wing scum? Lol No thanks
  #86  
Old 03-05-2010, 06:34 AM
roadkill roadkill is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,755
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maxpower2506 View Post
For 17 days we here in the west almost,and I MEAN, almost got a tiny bit of respect, but that is over, and all eastern Canada hates us again, ANYONE who doubts that, read a few Liberal Blogs, and then see how willing you are to maintain the status quo!
Okay, do you actually *know* any of us? I don't know what the news is telling you out there, but nobody's actually talking that way on the streets where I live, nor are any of my friends.

You're either listening too much to headline-hungry newsmakers, or you're talking out your... well, you know.

Quote:
Originally Posted by S.A.S View Post
So we should just keep supporting ungrateful provinces and sniveling left wing scum? Lol No thanks
Maybe we should calm down a bit and bring our opinions out of the McCarthy era. Just a thought.
__________________
roadkill

Probably the only English-speaking, French-Canadian lefty greeniac in Montréal with a 2008 Winchester M70 in .270. Probably.
  #87  
Old 03-05-2010, 10:06 AM
Okotokian's Avatar
Okotokian Okotokian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by S.A.S View Post
So we should just keep supporting ungrateful provinces and sniveling left wing scum? Lol No thanks
Not saying that at all. If you would like laws or regulations or programs changed I say have at it. That's what happens in Democracies. I'm just saying:

1) ditch the anger and hatred that seems to be fueling some people's rants, and

2) if your answer is to dismember our country over it then you are an enemy of the vast majority of us.
  #88  
Old 03-05-2010, 10:51 AM
Jamie Jamie is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,384
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Okotokian View Post
Not saying that at all. If you would like laws or regulations or programs changed I say have at it. That's what happens in Democracies. I'm just saying:

1) ditch the anger and hatred that seems to be fueling some people's rants, and

2) if your answer is to dismember our country over it then you are an enemy of the vast majority of us.
Oko.. Vast majority is very big word.

Jamie
  #89  
Old 03-05-2010, 10:54 AM
Okotokian's Avatar
Okotokian Okotokian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamie View Post
Oko.. Vast majority is very big word.

Jamie
actually it's two.
  #90  
Old 03-05-2010, 11:13 AM
Jamie Jamie is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,384
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Okotokian View Post
actually it's two.
Smart azz
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.