Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Hunting Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 06-24-2009, 04:51 PM
sheepguide sheepguide is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Rimbey
Posts: 5,908
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
Do you keep the nostril on a ram killed in a full curl zone?
complete unaltered skull
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 06-24-2009, 04:52 PM
Pathfinder76 Pathfinder76 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 16,255
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepguide View Post
You should read your regulations as it states complete unaltered skull with eyes intact. You got away with it but others taking your advise may not!
My goodness I pulled one off.
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 06-24-2009, 04:54 PM
sheephunter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
Do you keep the nostril on a ram killed in a full curl zone?
I've never hunted a full curl zone but considering it's not specified that you must in the Wildlife Act, I seriously doubt it could result in a sheep being seized. That being said, If the sheep was close, it might not be a bad idea but it's not legally required as is leaving the eyes in.

Truthfully Chuck, you can do whatever you like and I could care less....I'm just pointing out a regulation that many are unaware of. Choosing to follow the regulations is up to the individual. Following this one seems prudent to me.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 06-24-2009, 05:00 PM
sheepguide sheepguide is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Rimbey
Posts: 5,908
Default

hard to beleive some one would argue about a regulation
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 06-24-2009, 05:25 PM
Pathfinder76 Pathfinder76 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 16,255
Default

As an experiment I asked my 2 year old daughter to point out the "eyes" in the following picture. Unbelievably she was able to pull it off.

Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 06-24-2009, 05:30 PM
sheephunter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Chuck, I'm not arguing with you about how easy it is to determine legality with the eyes out.....just pointing out a regulation that I'm sure some F&W officers expect people to follow. It's a regulation written in black and white. It may not make sense to you but it's a regulation regardless....choose to do what you will with it....

BTW, your daughter pointed out the eye sockets....not the eyes.....a small discrepency but a discrepency none the less. I somehow doubt your two year old daughter will be considered an expert in court.

Speaking from experience, some officers will choose to make an issue of the eyes being removed.......so far you've been lucky and not run into one of those officers. Others may not be so lucky.....ugh

Last edited by sheephunter; 06-24-2009 at 05:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 06-24-2009, 06:24 PM
sheepguide sheepguide is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Rimbey
Posts: 5,908
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
As an experiment I asked my 2 year old daughter to point out the "eyes" in the following picture. Unbelievably she was able to pull it off.
Just to help you out Chuck the eye socket is considered part off the SKULL. If it was the eye socket do you thing they would put "eyes intact".
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.