Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-15-2015, 10:07 AM
McLeod McLeod is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 931
Default Grizzly Bear Population has doubled !

Those of us who hike throughout the mountains nad foothils knew this already but now it's offiical !

Results of a new survey show the grizzly bear population in western Alberta is making a strong recovery.

The number of bears in the Foothills east of Banff and Jasper National parks has doubled over the past decade, the study by fRI Research found.

■Alberta grizzly bears need habitat protection, conservation group says

Between 2004 and 2014, the grizzly bear population in Bear Management Area (BMA) 3 — which stretches from the Banff and Jasper national park boundaries east to Drayton Valley and Rocky Mountain House between Highways 16 and 11 — has increased from an estimated 36 bears to 74.

Gordon Stenhouse, who headed up the survey, says the findings are unusual.

Growth rate increased
"Normally a bear population in North America grows at a rate of three per cent a year. That would be considered a normal growth rate. And in this case, this population has grown at a rate of about seven per cent per year."

Grizzly bears have been listed as a threatened species in Alberta since 2010. While it's too soon to know why the bear population is increasing, Stenhouse believes there are several factors contributing to the dramatic upturn.

"We know that we have moved a number of bears in Alberta into this population over the last 10 years, so the increase could be partly as a result of those relocated bears coming into this area. And the other part could be that we've managed to keep human-caused mortality rates down so that the population is growing faster than one might expect."

■Relocation of Alberta grizzly bears harmful, environmental groups say
■Too many grizzly bears dying, conservation group says

Researchers also looked at the number of bears in the southern half of Jasper National Park. They counted 54 grizzlies there, for an estimated total of 113 grizzly bears in the entire park.

Researchers work with rotten cow blood

The latest survey of the grizzly population in the Foothills east of Jasper counted 74 bears in 2014. That's up from 36 when the last survey was completed, in 2004.




Stenhouse says counting grizzly bears is "not glamorous."

He and his team hike out into the forest and string "corrals of barbed wire" at knee height in a grid-like pattern. In the middle of the structure, they put mix of rotten cow blood, fish and canola oil.

"The bears smell that scent and come and crawl under the barbed wire or go over it and leave behind their hair."

Every 10 days, researchers collect the samples and do genetic DNA analysis on them to determine the species and gender of the animal.

Hunting moratorium
Researchers have divided the province into seven bear management areas.

"It will be important to study the effects of the hunting moratorium and the management practice of bear relocation," the study says.

"We know that the hunting moratorium has reduced the overall human-caused bear mortality. As well, between 2000 and 2014, enforcement officers relocated about 30 bears into BMA 3."




The study was completed by fRI Research, with funding from Weyerhaeuser, West Fraser, Alberta Environment and Parks, and Parks Canada.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-15-2015, 10:25 AM
3blade's Avatar
3blade 3blade is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 5,206
Default

Quadrupled. At least from their last "estimate" . And anything that has a parks Canada stink on it should be taken with a truckload of salt

Good news. Said it before, fall of 2016. Hopefully we get the hunt back and the govt stops wasting money chasing bears around the bush.
__________________
“Nothing is more persistent than a liberal with a dumb idea” - Ebrand
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-15-2015, 10:59 AM
SamSteele's Avatar
SamSteele SamSteele is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,818
Default

It seems much more likely that the original population estimate was off than that the population "exploded" like they are saying.

Unless they were playing "Beary White" in the foothills to increase reproduction rates...


SS
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-15-2015, 12:17 PM
Matt L.'s Avatar
Matt L. Matt L. is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Whitecourt
Posts: 5,818
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SamSteele View Post
It seems much more likely that the original population estimate was off than that the population "exploded" like they are saying.

Unless they were playing "Beary White" in the foothills to increase reproduction rates...


SS
Oh for sure it was, but they will never admit it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-15-2015, 12:43 PM
avb3 avb3 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 7,861
Default

I, for one, am glad to see that the Grizzly Bear Recovery plan is working, at least in one area.

The faster the population increases, the faster we get to get a season back. Of course, that won't happen with a NDP government, even if the ESCC removes the bears from the protected category.

On the other hand, the full recovery won't happen in the next 3 years, so we can dump the government that was elected in error.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-15-2015, 11:47 PM
happy honker happy honker is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,685
Default

The cows blood is rotten from being mixed with BS, exposed to hot air...and add a pinch of arrogance.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-16-2015, 12:02 AM
avb3 avb3 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 7,861
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by happy honker View Post
The cows blood is rotten from being mixed with BS, exposed to hot air...and add a pinch of arrogance.

What's the matter, you didn't like the science when numbers were down, and you don't like it when the numbers show a rebound?

Just can't please some people.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-16-2015, 05:53 AM
russ russ is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Coronation
Posts: 2,528
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McLeod View Post
Those of us who hike throughout the mountains nad foothils knew this already but now it's offiical !

Results of a new survey show the grizzly bear population in western Alberta is making a strong recovery.

The number of bears in the Foothills east of Banff and Jasper National parks has doubled over the past decade, the study by fRI Research found.

■Alberta grizzly bears need habitat protection, conservation group says

Between 2004 and 2014, the grizzly bear population in Bear Management Area (BMA) 3 — which stretches from the Banff and Jasper national park boundaries east to Drayton Valley and Rocky Mountain House between Highways 16 and 11 — has increased from an estimated 36 bears to 74.

Gordon Stenhouse, who headed up the survey, says the findings are unusual.

Growth rate increased
"Normally a bear population in North America grows at a rate of three per cent a year. That would be considered a normal growth rate. And in this case, this population has grown at a rate of about seven per cent per year."

Grizzly bears have been listed as a threatened species in Alberta since 2010. While it's too soon to know why the bear population is increasing, Stenhouse believes there are several factors contributing to the dramatic upturn.

"We know that we have moved a number of bears in Alberta into this population over the last 10 years, so the increase could be partly as a result of those relocated bears coming into this area. And the other part could be that we've managed to keep human-caused mortality rates down so that the population is growing faster than one might expect."

■Relocation of Alberta grizzly bears harmful, environmental groups say
■Too many grizzly bears dying, conservation group says

Researchers also looked at the number of bears in the southern half of Jasper National Park. They counted 54 grizzlies there, for an estimated total of 113 grizzly bears in the entire park.

Researchers work with rotten cow blood

The latest survey of the grizzly population in the Foothills east of Jasper counted 74 bears in 2014. That's up from 36 when the last survey was completed, in 2004.




Stenhouse says counting grizzly bears is "not glamorous."

He and his team hike out into the forest and string "corrals of barbed wire" at knee height in a grid-like pattern. In the middle of the structure, they put mix of rotten cow blood, fish and canola oil.

"The bears smell that scent and come and crawl under the barbed wire or go over it and leave behind their hair."

Every 10 days, researchers collect the samples and do genetic DNA analysis on them to determine the species and gender of the animal.

Hunting moratorium
Researchers have divided the province into seven bear management areas.

"It will be important to study the effects of the hunting moratorium and the management practice of bear relocation," the study says.

"We know that the hunting moratorium has reduced the overall human-caused bear mortality. As well, between 2000 and 2014, enforcement officers relocated about 30 bears into BMA 3."




The study was completed by fRI Research, with funding from Weyerhaeuser, West Fraser, Alberta Environment and Parks, and Parks Canada.

quick translation, they finally hired people that can use more than their fingers and toes to count!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-16-2015, 05:59 AM
58thecat's Avatar
58thecat 58thecat is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: At the end of the Thirsty Beaver Trail, Pinsky lake, Alberta.
Posts: 24,915
Default

More tags
__________________

Be careful when you follow the masses, sometimes the "M" is silent...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-16-2015, 07:20 AM
Taco Taco is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Claresholm, Ab
Posts: 4,022
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by russ View Post
quick translation, they finally hired people that can use more than their fingers and toes to count!
Nooo I'd say the provincial government was finally forced to get off it's collective ass and actually pay for a more accurate population count.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-16-2015, 07:30 AM
avb3 avb3 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 7,861
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by russ View Post
quick translation, they finally hired people that can use more than their fingers and toes to count!
Sorry to disappoint you, but it is the same team for the last decade or 15 years that I've been working on this.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-16-2015, 11:40 AM
russ russ is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Coronation
Posts: 2,528
Default

Thanks for the correction. So these numbers are just as suspect as the previous ones then.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-16-2015, 12:23 PM
woods_walker woods_walker is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hinton
Posts: 386
Default

If you want to see how the surveys and estimates were done, read this: https://friresearch.ca/sites/default...lationSize.pdf

At least the acknowledgement is there that the numbers are actually higher and there is actually some scientific backup for these numbers. Also remember that the data is for 1 grizzly management unit, this isn't all areas in the province. Yes the area you hunt is probably higher too.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-16-2015, 12:25 PM
avb3 avb3 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 7,861
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by russ View Post
Thanks for the correction. So these numbers are just as suspect as the previous ones then.
Well, then you should just go tell those that have their doctorates in biology how to set up the study programs and what statistical methods would be more valid.

I'm sure they would appreciate the input, seeing as they are doing it all wrong. I mean, what the heck do they know, they just have been recognized even in Sweden for their expertise, but us Albertan's are just gonna have to show them better, right?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-16-2015, 06:02 PM
Albertacoyotecaller Albertacoyotecaller is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,023
Default

How are the surveys being conducted differently than 15 years ago? Specifics?
__________________
Visit the Peace Country Fish & Game Association

PCFGA on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-17-2015, 08:40 AM
Scott h Scott h is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: At the lake
Posts: 2,534
Default

Great turn around ! Seams like what ever they are doing is working.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-17-2015, 11:46 AM
rem338win's Avatar
rem338win rem338win is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cowtown, agian
Posts: 2,814
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by avb3 View Post
What's the matter, you didn't like the science when numbers were down, and you don't like it when the numbers show a rebound?

Just can't please some people.
Quote:
Originally Posted by avb3 View Post
Well, then you should just go tell those that have their doctorates in biology how to set up the study programs and what statistical methods would be more valid.

I'm sure they would appreciate the input, seeing as they are doing it all wrong. I mean, what the heck do they know, they just have been recognized even in Sweden for their expertise, but us Albertan's are just gonna have to show them better, right?
The program was bias from the start and if doctorates are a sign of intelligence you've lost me. I've worked with enough Phd's that couldn't find their ass anywhere but a lab or a white paper when trying to apply theory to the reality. There are others that redeem them.

This team of "intellects" took nearly a decade of convincing to use more reliable methods of collection that other agencies had proven more effective than their own, well, a decade ago.

Don't mind me if I hold back on my slow clap for the gov biologists in Alberta and the extreme bias a few of them have openly portrayed.
__________________
The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.
- Sir Winston Churchill

A body of men holding themselves accountable to nobody ought not to be trusted by anybody.
-Thomas Paine
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-17-2015, 12:10 PM
MountainTi's Avatar
MountainTi MountainTi is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caroline
Posts: 7,358
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott h View Post
Great turn around ! Seams like what ever they are doing is working.
The original count was very flawed and self serving, but the bears have definately increased drastically in numbers
__________________
Two reasons you may think CO2 is a pollutant
1.You weren't paying attention in grade 5
2. You're stupid
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-17-2015, 12:14 PM
MountainTi's Avatar
MountainTi MountainTi is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caroline
Posts: 7,358
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Albertacoyotecaller View Post
How are the surveys being conducted differently than 15 years ago? Specifics?
With any luck they walked more than 100 yds. from the road to set up their "bait sites" this time. Maybe starting to use anecdotal evidence as well as other outside expertise as well. Dare to dream anyways
__________________
Two reasons you may think CO2 is a pollutant
1.You weren't paying attention in grade 5
2. You're stupid
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-17-2015, 08:46 PM
velox velox is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 37
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MountainTi View Post
With any luck they walked more than 100 yds. from the road to set up their "bait sites" this time. Maybe starting to use anecdotal evidence as well as other outside expertise as well. Dare to dream anyways
If it's anecdotal, it's not reliable evidence. But whatever, I'm sure you're smarter than every scientist in the world.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 10-18-2015, 02:35 AM
russ russ is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Coronation
Posts: 2,528
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by velox View Post
If it's anecdotal, it's not reliable evidence. But whatever, I'm sure you're smarter than every scientist in the world.
But it does provided leads.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-18-2015, 10:14 AM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,537
Default

The actual link.

http://calgaryherald.com/news/local-...entral-alberta
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-18-2015, 11:06 PM
jimmyrig jimmyrig is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 37
Default

great post thanks for the info.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-20-2015, 12:28 PM
Redwillow Redwillow is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 85
Default Grizz population

This is from a friend's game cam SW of Grovedale, looks to be a sow and 3 cubs
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_20151020_122522.jpg (113.1 KB, 22 views)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.