Lease Land

[FiveO]

Man am I ticked. I got refused access to 13 quarters of grazing lease this morning. I informed the leasor that he couldnt refuse reasonable access he thought different. This guy has some of the best land in 336 and gave me the same BS last year well not going to take it so I called the land office and spoke with one hell of a nice guy. The land guy is going to contact this nimrod and set him straight, I told him I want him fined and the land guy said if he didnt cooperate he would be fined.
Lets see what happens.

[TheClash]

FiveO..sorry to hear about that. that sucks. but i am glad to hear that rather than being some sort of vigilante or ignoring the leaser..that you followed the proper chain of command. good on ya.

[Dick284]

Unfortunatly un less the Leasor caves,(after the talk to the land guy) it will go to arbitration, and by the time that gets worked out your season will be over.
But none the less let us know how it shakes out.
It could proove interesting.
Especially if a local newspaer got wind of the decision, and it made it into print. (wake up call)

[FiveO]

I told the Land Guy I want him charged and will not rest until he is set straight. If it is to late for this season well there is always next and he will face a fine for his poor judgment.

If he has his cattle on the land he is allowed to restrict you access.

[FiveO]

He doesnt hace cattle on all 13 Quarters. This guy is just a dink.

I feel for you 5-0. But if this guy is a dink, all he has to do is pasture 13 cows. 1/quarter. And he doesn't have to give access. I hope you win your battle!!!!

[Jamie]

Take him to town!!
Please keep us updated on what happens

Jamie

[FiveO]

Originally Posted by 700TI

I feel for you 5-0. But if this guy is a dink, all he has to do is pasture 13 cows. 1/quarter. And he doesn't have to give access. I hope you win your battle!!!!

Can leaseholders deny access whenever livestock are on the lease?
If livestock are not impacted by the visit, leaseholders are expected to provide access. Leaseholders are expected to follow the intent of this legislation, which is to balance the right of recreational users to access with the leaseholder's need to protect the land or livestock from possible harm. Moving a few cattle from one pasture to another to prevent recreational access is an example of not following the intent of the legislation.

I will not rest until this guy gets what is coming to him. He F'D with the wrong guy.

[Deerme]

Originally Posted by FiveO

Man am I ticked. I got refused access to 13 quarters of grazing lease this morning. I informed the leasor that he couldnt refuse reasonable access he thought different. This guy has some of the best land in 336 and gave me the same BS last year well not going to take it so I called the land office and spoke with one hell of a nice guy. The land guy is going to contact this nimrod and set him straight, I told him I want him fined and the land guy said if he didnt cooperate he would be fined.
Lets see what happens.

Five-0...this wasn't Jackpine was it?

Originally Posted by FiveO

Man am I ticked. I got refused access to 13 quarters of grazing lease this morning. I informed the leasor that he couldnt refuse reasonable access he thought different. This guy has some of the best land in 336 and gave me the same BS last year well not going to take it so I called the land office and spoke with one hell of a nice guy. The land guy is going to contact this nimrod and set him straight, I told him I want him fined and the land guy said if he didnt cooperate he would be fined.
Lets see what happens.

You might see your problem as seeing this "nimrod" who lease 13 quarters and probably owns title to just as much as a "lesser" human than you 'cause he's got cow **** on his boots. But you, being the owner of a 33' x 100' patch of grass and driving an SUV with a navigation system and a Blueberry or Blackberry or whatever the F' you call as being superior. Why don't you learn a bit more about those folks whose land you wish to enter upon. I believe that Alberta Outdoorsman recently printed an article about that...you just might get a more harmonious outcome.