Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-26-2024, 09:26 AM
58thecat's Avatar
58thecat 58thecat is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: At the end of the Thirsty Beaver Trail, Pinsky lake, Alberta.
Posts: 24,776
Default Bill 20

Alberta government wants power to remove municipal councillors, repeal bylaws it doesn't like….

https://www.cbc.ca/news

Agree? Disagree?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________

Be careful when you follow the masses, sometimes the "M" is silent...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-26-2024, 09:42 AM
Trochu's Avatar
Trochu Trochu is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 7,763
Default

Pretty sure Municipal Affairs has had this ability for decades.

And your link seems to be off....
__________________
I hope I don't vote for Biden when I'm dead!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-26-2024, 09:47 AM
Grizzly Adams1 Grizzly Adams1 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 3,899
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trochu View Post
Pretty sure Municipal Affairs has had this ability for decades.

And your link seems to be off....
X2, but it sounds like they are intending to bring party affiliation to the municipal level. I'm against it.
__________________
Woe unto them that join house to house, that lay field to field, till there is no place, that they be alone in the midst of the Earth.

Isaiah 5:8
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-26-2024, 10:52 AM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,356
Default

I am against parties at the municipal level, but there does need to be a better system of recall. Requiring 500000 signatures in Calgary is totally asinine
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-26-2024, 11:08 AM
Stinky Buffalo's Avatar
Stinky Buffalo Stinky Buffalo is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: A bit North o' Center...
Posts: 11,242
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
I am against parties at the municipal level, but there does need to be a better system of recall. Requiring 500000 signatures in Calgary is totally asinine
Exactly - Imagine the damage that could happen to our municipalities if the NDP was running the provincial show... Having recall options at the municipal level makes more sense.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-26-2024, 11:10 AM
DirtShooter's Avatar
DirtShooter DirtShooter is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Alberta
Posts: 626
Default

I'd like to know if my mayor is a wacky liberal or dipper. I'm for outing party affiliates.
__________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-26-2024, 04:23 PM
pikergolf's Avatar
pikergolf pikergolf is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 11,436
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grizzly Adams1 View Post
X2, but it sounds like they are intending to bring party affiliation to the municipal level. I'm against it.
I'm for it, I want to know what I'm getting. Last election I sent an email to every mayoral and councilor candidate in our community asking them to rate themselves on a scale of one to ten. Only two answered the question, both identifying as right wing, the rest gave mumbo jumbo answers and semi lectures about dealing with issues not political lines yet when it came time to vote on issues turns out the were lefty looney. The woke have hidden out for to long pretending they didn't have an agenda. School boards are especially frustrating. Seems they, women in particular are more interested in their unspoken agenda than serving the public.
__________________
“One of the sad signs of our times is that we have demonized those who produce, subsidized those who refuse to produce, and canonized those who complain.”

Thomas Sowell
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-26-2024, 04:54 PM
sns2's Avatar
sns2 sns2 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: My House
Posts: 13,486
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pikergolf View Post
I'm for it, I want to know what I'm getting. Last election I sent an email to every mayoral and councilor candidate in our community asking them to rate themselves on a scale of one to ten. Only two answered the question, both identifying as right wing, the rest gave mumbo jumbo answers and semi lectures about dealing with issues not political lines yet when it came time to vote on issues turns out the were lefty looney. The woke have hidden out for to long pretending they didn't have an agenda. School boards are especially frustrating. Seems they, women in particular are more interested in their unspoken agenda than serving the public.
Heck yeah. You are on the money.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-26-2024, 05:31 PM
pikergolf's Avatar
pikergolf pikergolf is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 11,436
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pikergolf View Post
I'm for it, I want to know what I'm getting. Last election I sent an email to every mayoral and councilor candidate in our community asking them to rate themselves on a scale of one to ten. Only two answered the question, both identifying as right wing, the rest gave mumbo jumbo answers and semi lectures about dealing with issues not political lines yet when it came time to vote on issues turns out the were lefty looney. The woke have hidden out for to long pretending they didn't have an agenda. School boards are especially frustrating. Seems they, women in particular are more interested in their unspoken agenda than serving the public.
Just to be clear the scale I gave them was one being hard left and ten being hard right.
__________________
“One of the sad signs of our times is that we have demonized those who produce, subsidized those who refuse to produce, and canonized those who complain.”

Thomas Sowell
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-26-2024, 05:47 PM
I’d rather be outdoors I’d rather be outdoors is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 955
Default

This is definitely pizzing off the dippers so all good in my books. Go Danielle go! Been a long while since big city swamps have been drained.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-26-2024, 11:11 AM
58thecat's Avatar
58thecat 58thecat is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: At the end of the Thirsty Beaver Trail, Pinsky lake, Alberta.
Posts: 24,776
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trochu View Post
Pretty sure Municipal Affairs has had this ability for decades.

And your link seems to be off....

Sorry or the wrong link but here it is in a nutshell,
And if municipal affairs had this lower then why introduce new bill?

The Alberta government has introduced a bill that would grant it sweeping powers over municipalities, including the right to fire councillors, overturn bylaws and postpone elections.

Municipal Affairs Minster Ric McIver says the new powers outlined in Bill 20 are justified to ensure fair elections and accountability from municipal leaders.

“We are doing this in order to protect the provincial interests, by ensuring municipalities are governing affairs that are within their jurisdiction,” he says.

The provincial government’s authority over local bylaws was previously limited to land-use and, more recently, public masking and vaccinations.


“It is our intention that such interventions will only be considered at last resort,” says McIver. “My most fervent wish is that this authority is never ever used.

The province is pointing to the instance of dropping masking regulations during the pandemic, only to have the City of Edmonton institute a bylaw requiring masks. In order to overturn the bylaw, a piece of legislation had to be tabled.

McIver says if that happened when the house was not sitting it could have meant recalling the legislature.

When asked about how the power of cabinet to make changes would be checked in the future, McIver said voters would hold politicians accountable, and if mistakes are made it will come up in future elections.

This ain’t gonna sit well with many Albertans.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________

Be careful when you follow the masses, sometimes the "M" is silent...
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-26-2024, 11:20 AM
Drewski Canuck Drewski Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,994
Default

Municipalities have no Constitutional rights under the BNA Act, Charter, etc.

Municipalities are solely the creation of Provincial Legislation, and are at the behest and direction of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs under the Municipalities Act.

Of Course the Province can do what it wishes with Municipalities, like it or not.

Municipalities are solely an administrative tool for the Province. Nothing more, and deserving of scrutiny and oversight.

Problem is that the Left has been able to hijack this vehicle of Government Services, and drive their Agendas through it.

Now the Left and the Woke are upset that their power abuse has been identified, and is being taken away from them.

Drewski
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-26-2024, 11:29 AM
58thecat's Avatar
58thecat 58thecat is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: At the end of the Thirsty Beaver Trail, Pinsky lake, Alberta.
Posts: 24,776
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drewski Canuck View Post
Municipalities have no Constitutional rights under the BNA Act, Charter, etc.

Municipalities are solely the creation of Provincial Legislation, and are at the behest and direction of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs under the Municipalities Act.

Of Course the Province can do what it wishes with Municipalities, like it or not.

Municipalities are solely an administrative tool for the Province. Nothing more, and deserving of scrutiny and oversight.

Problem is that the Left has been able to hijack this vehicle of Government Services, and drive their Agendas through it.

Now the Left and the Woke are upset that their power abuse has been identified, and is being taken away from them.

Drewski

Then why introduce a new Bill?

Must be something they want to control especially if it doesn’t line up with their political agendas.

Something doesn’t sit right kinda reminds me of our crazy federal government.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________

Be careful when you follow the masses, sometimes the "M" is silent...
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-26-2024, 11:59 AM
Dynamic Dynamic is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 489
Default

If you looked up the definition of irony in the dictionary it would probably be this bill. I think it’s pretty hilarious and on point for Queen Dani. It all seriousness it’s about control at the municipal level, nothing more nothing less.

Funny how it wasn’t campaigned on, the idea of party affiliations was not popular, but nonetheless this gets rammed through. You get who you vote for folks.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-26-2024, 12:26 PM
sns2's Avatar
sns2 sns2 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: My House
Posts: 13,486
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 58thecat View Post
Then why introduce a new Bill?

Must be something they want to control especially if it doesn’t line up with their political agendas.

Something doesn’t sit right kinda reminds me of our crazy federal government.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Did you ever stop to think this may actually be a type of pre-emptive warning to Edmonton and Calgary councils to stay in their own bloody lanes and do the jobs they were elected to do?

You live in Cold Lake. You don’t even begin to be affected by the policies that have made Edmonton and Calgary into tent cities.

This bill is way overdue, and as has been mentioned, a formalizing of powers that already exist.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.