|
|
03-11-2017, 09:28 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 134
|
|
Pistols on private land?
No, it's not an invitation to duel! It's a question about usage.
I'm pretty sure the answer is "No", but thought I'd ask: can I shoot pistols on private land I own?
I am a member of a range, but thought it would be nice - if possible - to take my Enfield .38 S&W and Swiss 7.5 revolver to shoot outdoors. Again, if possible.
|
03-11-2017, 09:29 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Outside of Onoway
Posts: 821
|
|
Not legal
__________________
IT'S COMING RIGHT FOR US!!!!!!!
|
03-11-2017, 09:39 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 351
|
|
There was a report last week on one of my news feeds that said it was not illegal. Maybe NFA site. What it said was there is nothing wrote in the law to make it illegal so it must be legal. I will see if I can find it and repost on here.
I do not remember who wrote it so maybe it is not believable.
|
03-11-2017, 09:37 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,414
|
|
Nope. Your permit to transfer likely reads to approved range and back by the most direct route. That's all you can legally do with it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
03-11-2017, 09:40 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dreadful Valley
Posts: 14,779
|
|
You can only discharge restricted firearms where you are allowed by law to do so..... that pretty much means a CFO vetted and certified range.
I'm surprised this wasn't covered in your CFSC(R) course.
__________________
There are no absolutes
|
03-11-2017, 09:45 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: calgary
Posts: 419
|
|
by law NO ...... but if a tree falls in the bush and no one is around to hear it ...does it make a noise?
|
03-11-2017, 09:46 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 351
|
|
Check FB page Carry Concealed Canada for the story
|
03-11-2017, 09:47 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 46,145
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick284
You can only discharge restricted firearms where you are allowed by law to do so..... that pretty much means a CFO vetted and certified range.
I'm surprised this wasn't covered in your CFSC(R) course.
|
I can only wonder how a person that has completed a restricted PAL course would not know this. I would think that the most important information in the course would be what constitutes a restricted firearm, and where it can legally be discharged.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
|
03-11-2017, 09:51 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 351
|
|
The person who wrote the story is a lawyer who specializing in firearms law in Canada.
|
03-11-2017, 09:59 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,872
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by coachman
The person who wrote the story is a lawyer who specializing in firearms law in Canada.
|
That's great get him to use you as a test case .
What I know about lawyers is that they will find anything to try and prove their point , win or LOSE.
And they may lose a case but it doesn't affect them .
The people they represent however .......
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
Last edited by catnthehat; 03-11-2017 at 10:22 AM.
|
03-11-2017, 10:14 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 21,399
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by catnthehat
That's great get him to use you as a test case .
What I know about lawyers is that they will find anything to try and prove their point , win or LOSE.
And they may lose a case but it doesn't affect them .
The people they represent however .......
Cat
|
Lawyer wins, either way.
Grizz
__________________
"Indeed, no human being has yet lived under conditions which, considering the prevailing climates of the past, can be regarded as normal."
John E. Pfeiffer The Emergence of Man
written in 1969
Last edited by catnthehat; 03-11-2017 at 10:22 AM.
|
03-11-2017, 10:18 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 46,145
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by coachman
The person who wrote the story is a lawyer who specializing in firearms law in Canada.
|
If that lawyer really believed what he is spouting, he would shoot a restricted weapon outside of a restricted range, and get arrested, so that he could win his case in court. Why do you suppose hasn't he done that ? Probably because he is too smart to actually do something that stupid, and then possibly lose in court. Now if he could find someone foolish enough to be his test case, so he takes no risk, and he gets paid for his time, that is another story.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
|
03-15-2017, 03:00 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 290
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick284
You can only discharge restricted firearms where you are allowed by law to do so..... that pretty much means a CFO vetted and certified range.
I'm surprised this wasn't covered in your CFSC(R) course.
|
If anyone thinks that ranchers & farmers, many , many miles from a CFO approved range, are going to make the trip to shoot their restricted firearms, & make the long trip home again, then you're " Delusional". This goes on all the time & the RCMP, know it does, and look the other way. They know that those country folk are 99% not a threat to public safety, hell they probably even visit them occasionally to pop off a few rounds. I know this for a fact, as a retired RCMP told me so. I guess it's like, you can do whatever, Just don't get caught, -- we live in Canada/ everything's illegal. The only ones that won't move to somehow make it legal for hunting or wilderness use are the Politicians, because it buys them votes, duping people into thinking their safer if we RPAL holders leave them locked up in our safes. The wolves guarding the sheep.-----BS. People aren't so smart ,falling for that crap.
|
03-15-2017, 07:51 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,872
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by titegroup
If anyone thinks that ranchers & farmers, many , many miles from a CFO approved range, are going to make the trip to shoot their restricted firearms, & make the long trip home again, then you're " Delusional". This goes on all the time & the RCMP, know it does, and look the other way. They know that those country folk are 99% not a threat to public safety, hell they probably even visit them occasionally to pop off a few rounds. I know this for a fact, as a retired RCMP told me so. I guess it's like, you can do whatever, Just don't get caught, -- we live in Canada/ everything's illegal. The only ones that won't move to somehow make it legal for hunting or wilderness use are the Politicians, because it buys them votes, duping people into thinking their safer if we RPAL holders leave them locked up in our safes. The wolves guarding the sheep.-----BS. People aren't so smart ,falling for that crap.
|
This is the biggest pile of garbage in this whole thread from the RCMP knowing
People shoot restricted and do nothing to the politicians not making wilderness carry legal to the fact that the firearms laws not being changed somehow is the hinge point on whether or not people get elected .
RCMP will not chase down a " maybe he's shooting" just in they might be able to convict someone any sooner than they will a bootlegger .
people can get a wilderness carry permit easier today than they could 20 years ago .
As for elections hinging on a firearms issue , well just because WE think it is important not everyone else does.
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
Last edited by catnthehat; 03-15-2017 at 06:14 PM.
|
03-15-2017, 02:03 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 290
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by catnthehat
This is the biggest pile of garbage in this whole thread from the RCMP knowing
People shoot restricted and do nothing to the politicians not making wilderness carry legal to the fact that the firearms laws not breing changed somehow is the hinge point on whether or not people get elected .
RCMP will not chase down a " maybe he's shooting" just in they might be able to convict someone any sooner than they will a bootlegger .
people can get a wilderness carry permit easier today than they could 20 years ago .
As for elections hinging on a firearms issue , well just because WE think it is important not everyone else does.
Cat
|
Sometimes it's tough" Cat" interpreting your posts, you might need spell check--LOL. But I do agree with you, the elections don't hinge on the firearm laws, and it might be easier to get a wilderness carry permit today, but only if it pertains to your employment( which I believe discriminates against the rest of RPAL holders). Trudope can legalize a drug which messes with your mind, ( recreational marijuana use) but won't legalize recreational use( other than at a cfo approved range) for RPAL holders---meaning wilderness carry. Of course - he has shares in the medical marijuana grow business, does that surprise anyone? Double standard Lib's, *****.
Last edited by catnthehat; 03-15-2017 at 06:15 PM.
|
03-11-2017, 09:48 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 93
|
|
Just to add to op question.
What if your residence is the private land. Meaning out in the country of course. Can u discharge hand gun in the back 40.
Elkster
|
03-11-2017, 09:53 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: In a tree near ALTA
Posts: 3,061
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elkster
Just to add to op question.
What if your residence is the private land. Meaning out in the country of course. Can u discharge hand gun in the back 40.
Elkster
|
After popping off a few rounds from the ol' 44 , your supposed to call the RCMP and CFC and turn your self in ,,,,,
OH, and also start a thread about the ordeal on a popular online chat forum, just to make sure you get caught,,,,
|
03-11-2017, 11:18 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: 204
Posts: 5,616
|
|
If it were convenient to shoot restricted firearms, a lot more people would own them.
That is why you aren't allowed to shoot on private land.
__________________
I don't think our taxes should be this high.
|
03-11-2017, 12:54 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 5,326
|
|
It is obvious that private, secluded property is not safe enough for Canadians to discharge restricted firearms.
Think of the children.
|
03-11-2017, 01:04 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: East Central AB
Posts: 1,279
|
|
Sounds like a trolling question especially with 6 posts.
|
03-11-2017, 01:06 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 46,145
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newview01
It is obvious that private, secluded property is not safe enough for Canadians to discharge restricted firearms.
Think of the children.
|
It has nothing to do with safety, it's all about control.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
|
03-11-2017, 01:37 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: In a tree near ALTA
Posts: 3,061
|
|
Just find yourself a good declassified/ deregistered operational handgun revolver, Load your own ammo and you can do what the hell you want with it, anywhere you wish to shoot it and carry it,
They can pound salt In their xxx , both the RCMP and CFC true
It is NOT a restricted firearm, they deregistered it
|
03-11-2017, 02:01 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 5,326
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11
It has nothing to do with safety, it's all about control.
|
In the name of public safety.
|
03-17-2017, 09:18 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 123
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11
It has nothing to do with safety, it's all about control.
|
Bingo!!
|
03-11-2017, 01:58 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,414
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newview01
It is obvious that private, secluded property is not safe enough for Canadians to discharge restricted firearms.
Think of the children.
|
He asked if it was legal.
Sent from my SM-N900W8 using Tapatalk
|
03-11-2017, 02:02 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 5,326
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustMe
He asked if it was legal.
Sent from my SM-N900W8 using Tapatalk
|
I am aware of that. He got his answer. It is obvious that I am merely making a mockery of our firearms laws.
|
03-11-2017, 02:24 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,414
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newview01
I am aware of that. He got his answer. It is obvious that I am merely making a mockery of our firearms laws.
|
Gotcha. One thing we can be sure of, firearms laws are sure to be come more restrictive than more lenient as we become more and more of an urban society with fewer and fewer sportsmen.
When I was a kid back in the 60s, my friends and I used to cut off single shot Cooey 22's and make handguns out of them. Today if you tried to do that, we'd be in deep sh1t. Course we weren't stupid enough to take them downtown or anything. Knew better than to drink in public when we underage too, or talk back to our teachers, parents or police. Times change and not often for the better.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
03-12-2017, 01:32 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: At the end of the Thirsty Beaver Trail, Pinsky lake, Alberta.
Posts: 25,284
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newview01
I am aware of that. He got his answer. It is obvious that I am merely making a mockery of our firearms laws.
|
Making a mockery of our firearms laws...already done by the ones who wrote it
__________________
Be careful when you follow the masses, sometimes the "M" is silent...
|
03-11-2017, 09:04 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 273
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TargetRick
No, it's not an invitation to duel! It's a question about usage.
I'm pretty sure the answer is "No", but thought I'd ask: can I shoot pistols on private land I own?
I am a member of a range, but thought it would be nice - if possible - to take my Enfield .38 S&W and Swiss 7.5 revolver to shoot outdoors. Again, if possible.
|
To clarify what's above, it is illegal to discharge a RESTRICTED firearm not at a range. Don't do it and if you do so it treat it like Fight Club. I've heard of people trying to get a range certified on their land because all they want to do is a little target practice, but it ain't easy. Probably easier to get a trap line and a permit to carry it on the trap line only, but I know that's not what you're looking for.
Antique handguns may not be covered by this if they are not restricted, I know there are some that aren't and you could target shoot with but I don't know which or what details make the distinction. So, if you're going that way be damn sure you know the rules, and keep out of trouble because any LEO you meet may not be aware of that particular loophole. I do know our firearms laws are arbitrary and unnecessarily complicated, and see them mostly as rules intended to discourage shooting sports as a hobby over time.
Good reason to get an RPAL and a handgun if you don't have one already, and invite a neighbor to the range...
|
03-12-2017, 07:23 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: W5
Posts: 1,093
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick284
You can only discharge restricted firearms where you are allowed by law to do so..... that pretty much means a CFO vetted and certified range.
I'm surprised this wasn't covered in your CFSC(R) course.
|
Please provide the CC section that says it's illegal.
I'm betting you can't because no such law exists to my knowledge?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustMe
Nope. Your permit to transfer likely reads to approved range and back by the most direct route. That's all you can legally do with it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
Exactly,and this is the argument that is being made by said lawyer.
Your ATT authorizes you to transport your restricted firearm,usually from your home address....and this is the important part.
If you live on rural property,the entire property may well be(but not always)identified as a numbered address,essentially,the entire property shares the same address as your actual house...ie, 123 Range Rd 52 etc etc.
If you can legally discharge a non-restricted rifle on your home property,ie;hunting,pest control,target practice etc....there is actually no law and no reason why you theoretically cannot discharge a restricted firearm there as well.
You haven't violated any conditions of your ATT.....technically,you are still at home and have not actually transported the restricted firearm anywhere.
Please cite what LAW has been broken if you disagree?
Note,I am not a lawyer,nor do I play one on TV.....test and challenge at your own risk and peril.
__________________
The toughest thing about waiting for the zombie apocalypse is pretending that I'm not excited.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:07 AM.
|