Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-24-2024, 04:07 AM
waldedw's Avatar
waldedw waldedw is online now
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Lloydminster
Posts: 4,664
Default 7 PRC and US869

I have a swack of US869 that I used in my 7 RUM which I don't have anymore, anyway I have been trying to find some load data for US869 and the 7 PRC to no avail. I have a load for my 6.5 PRC with US869 and the 142gr NABLR which are now as hard to find as RL26 I think they are ferry dust. That load is very accurate however it's about 75 FPS slower than the load with RL25.

I see US869 is about 4 notches slower on the burn rate chart than LRT, there is load data available for LRT for the 7 PRC with 175gr and any data I find for any cartridge that shows both LRT and US869 in every case the max charge of US 869 is the same or 1 gr more. Keeping with that LRT shows a max 80gr with the 175gr in 7 PRC and I was thinking I am going to load some test loads with US869 starting around 74gr and working up 1/2 gr at a time until I start to see pressure.

I measured an empty case for the 7 PRC and filled to the base of the neck I can get 83gr US869 in it so should be able to load near max loads without to much compression.

I've been loaded for 50 years now but have always used published data as a starting point and going from there, am I on the right track here fellows or am I peeing into the wind, seeing that Alliant has suspended powder manufacture for a while anything RL is going to become more scarce than it already is, I have a couple loads that show promise for the 7 PRC with RL25 and H1000
__________________
The problem we have today is that the people who work for a living are outnumbered by the people who vote for a living.

We were all born ignorant but one must work very hard to remain that way.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-24-2024, 08:20 AM
Dean2's Avatar
Dean2 Dean2 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Near Edmonton
Posts: 15,256
Default

I would call Hodgdon and ask them if they have a starting load for US869 and the 7PRC. They have always been amazingly helpful when I have called them.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-24-2024, 09:44 AM
waldedw's Avatar
waldedw waldedw is online now
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Lloydminster
Posts: 4,664
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean2 View Post
I would call Hodgdon and ask them if they have a starting load for US869 and the 7PRC. They have always been amazingly helpful when I have called them.
Thanks Dean I went that route already, they said they have not tested US896 in the 7 PRC as of yet
__________________
The problem we have today is that the people who work for a living are outnumbered by the people who vote for a living.

We were all born ignorant but one must work very hard to remain that way.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-24-2024, 09:49 AM
Dean2's Avatar
Dean2 Dean2 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Near Edmonton
Posts: 15,256
Default

Well, in that case, I would take the start load for a 6.5 PRC with the same bullet weight and start there and work my way up. The good thing about 869 is it is so damn SLOOOOWWWW, it has a burn rate similar to wet coal, it would be hard to get very far over pressure in the 7 PRC cartridge. Even in the 7 RUM there is barely enough capacity to get high pressure.

Last edited by Dean2; 05-24-2024 at 10:13 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-24-2024, 10:24 AM
brewster29 brewster29 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: East Kootenays, BC
Posts: 1,175
Default

I was able to find QL data for US869 in a 7 REM mag…
Given that the 7 PRC case is pretty much the same volume it might be worth a try, although velocities are low. My 7PRC like LRT and Retumbo with 175’s.

Cartridge : 7 mm Rem. Mag.(SAAMI)
Bullet : .284, 195, Berger ElHunt G7 #28550
Useable Case Capaci: 68.686 grain H2O = 4.460 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.290 inch = 83.57 mm
Barrel Length : 26.0 inch = 660.4 mm
Powder : Hodgdon US 869

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 2.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
% % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms

-20.0 90 60.72 2143 1989 28334 9127 79.3 1.905
-18.0 92 62.23 2206 2107 30474 9500 81.1 1.848
-16.0 95 63.75 2270 2231 32797 9870 82.8 1.794
-14.0 97 65.27 2334 2360 35324 10233 84.5 1.741
-12.0 99 66.79 2400 2494 38076 10589 86.1 1.686
-10.0 101 68.31 2466 2634 41081 10935 87.7 1.626
-08.0 104 69.82 2533 2779 44367 11270 89.1 1.568
-06.0 106 71.34 2601 2930 47967 11591 90.6 1.511
-04.0 108 72.86 2670 3087 51919 11897 91.9 1.456 ! Near Maximum !
-02.0 110 74.38 2740 3250 56270 12185 93.2 1.404 ! Near Maximum !
+00.0 113 75.90 2810 3419 61071 12454 94.3 1.352 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+02.0 115 77.41 2881 3594 66387 12700 95.4 1.303 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.