View Single Post
  #8  
Old 02-08-2016, 09:02 AM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,260
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rembo View Post
Consider a 6.5 x 55 in the same rifle. You get 1-3/4" more barrel, only 3.5 ounces heavier, and a Swede in a 22-7/16" barrel should push a 140 a bit faster than a 7-08 in a 20-1/4" barrel. You can make up the weight difference with a 4.5-14 x 40 Leupold which is 3 ounces lighter than the Swarovski. Stay away from the OptiLoks if weight is a consideration.
Just my opinion as that's what I would be looking at. But then again, like you said, the 270 Win is an option if you go to the long action.
I agree on the 6.5x55, but I would go with the Swarovski Z3 3-10x42 which has plenty of magnification for a lightweight mountain rifle. and it is lighter than the Leupold mentioned, with superior lenses and coatings.
My own 6.5x55 has a 20" barrel, and it pushes the 129gr Accubond LR at around 2750, and with the very high B.C. it retains velocity better than most 130-140gr .284" bullets.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.

Last edited by elkhunter11; 02-08-2016 at 09:08 AM.
Reply With Quote