View Single Post
  #147  
Old 11-29-2020, 09:06 AM
Don Andersen Don Andersen is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 1,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wind drift View Post
What part is BS? And by BS, I assume you mean a falsehood? I’m trying to be objective in this, and I question whether anyone, besides the ACA, can determine where their legal risk thresholds are located in this regard. Disagreement with their position by us doesn’t make it a wrong position.
I got laughed at by Towns and Municipalities when I asked them about fencing their sewage aeration holes.
Locating a system where it was subject to high winds and surround it with a fence designed to stop wind followed by locating system where road access is chancy at best is a recipe for a **** up.
Use the system bought and paid for by NGOs located on the west end of the lake outta the wind. Parks wouldn’t use it because they had to pay for power.
Look at the parking lot and campground to determine angler use. Huge increase.
The ministers letter failed to describe all the previous **** ups by their dept. or ACA.

Don
Reply With Quote