Quote:
Originally Posted by two_ker
Yup, all good points. Hopefully next they make it illegal for fly chuckers to wander up and down these creeks, causing sediment to be disturbed, spawning beds to be walked on. All in an effort to get to the next big pool and catch the endangered cutthroat. (Whats the survival rate on C&R? Yes better than catch and keep)
Maybe we should have a mandatory felt boot and wader inspection area so as to not introduce invasive species, at a minimal cost to enthusiasts.
Lets get the ban hammer swinging!  |
Ah yes, the false equivalencies argument, as usual. Next up...an apples to zebras comparison. And, after that, why mowing your lawn is 700 times worse than clearcutting the Amazon rainforest!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Black
So why is mr. Finch fixated on only one source? True science explores all possibilities does it not? I'm assuming mr finch knows how to use the google as well(or better) than you do, and could have found these studies before he wrote his article to ensure all factors were discussed. Or is ther another reason he wrote it,,,,,,,
My point being many are quick to applaud a closure for one user group if they do not participate in that activity, or if the closure is beneficial to themselves. Quite selfish really.
|
This, ^ , for the win. The winner of most ironic post.
Nothing more selfish than quadders ripping up terrain, causing disturbance, displacing other recreational users and wildlife for...wait for it...their own pleasure. Where's the emoticon for clapping.
