View Single Post
  #181  
Old 01-21-2022, 01:15 PM
huntwat huntwat is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 7magtime View Post
Just looking at antlered moose, these were the 2021 allocations per WMU.

https://open.alberta.ca/dataset/de23...eason-2021.pdf

Below is total antlered moose resident tags % to outfitter tags % per WMU for the 2021 season:

412-6 to 9 (outfitters 150% of tags)
414-15 to 8 (outfitters 53% of tags)
417-3 to 8 (outfitters 260% of tags)
420-5 to 8 (outfitters 160% of tags)
422-5 to 6 (outfitters 120% of tags)
426-3 to 7 (outfitters 233% of tags)
428-5 to 6 (outfitters 120% of tags)
430-5 to 7 (outfitters 140% of tags)
432-5 to 4 (outfitters 80% of tags)
434-5 to 10 (outfitters 200% of tags)
436-5 to 10 (outfitters 200% of tags)
437-10 to 20 (outfitters 200% of tags)
438-15 to 23 (outfitters 153% of tags)
439-5 to 3 (outfitters 60% of tags)
440-15 to 8 (outfitters 53% of tags)
441-15 to 19 (outfitters 127% of tags)

This is just for the mountain WMU’s which shows how lopsided the current system is for resident to outfitter allocations and that it’s nowhere near the supposed 10% for outfitters. The 300’s WMU’s are not skewed as much but many are still over the so called “10% allowed”.

If I’m interpreting these numbers incorrectly, please enlighten me on where the mistake is….

As well, please explain how the draw times for residents in these WMU’s would not decrease if the outfitter allocations for the WMU’s above were cut back to the required 10% for the 2022 season?
I understand where you’re coming from and agree with you. But your numbers are way off.


412- 9/15 tags
414- 8/22 tags
417- 8/11 tags

And so on. Still much higher than 10% “allowed”
Reply With Quote