Quote:
Originally Posted by wind drift
It’s not such a difference at all. The outcome is the same if private financial interests trump conservation and wise management. Allowing outfitters to include allocations as part of the equity of their personal business and net worth gives them, individually and collectively, a greater degree of leverage to lobby and influence game management.
|
It doesn’t trump sound game management because they aren’t the ones who dictate harvest quotas. The government at can buy them back at any time. Just like they did with commercial fishing in Alberta. The government makes the rules