Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurt505
Plenty of species thought to be extinct? So they’ve actually had proof that they existed but thought that they went extinct only to find out they haven’t. Big difference! You should learn about the population density of a species required to perpetuate existence. If they are as rare as you claim, the likelihood of the species being able to continue to procreate is extremely unlikely. If we can’t find them with all our modern technology, how do they find each other to mate? Do they have telekinetic powers?
This is North America not Papua New Guinea, we have a lot more people and technology, what’s a newly discovered species here?
|
The Saori antelope(?) of Vietnam was only discovered as fossils, or bones in 1992 and the live one was discovered in 2010.
The population density of Snow Leopards using several different methods of estimation is anywhere between about 1.6-5 in 100 square kilometers. That means there could be only one cat in over 15 000 acres. Snow Leopards are almost a silent cat, and might mewl, hiss, or wail, but can not roar like other big cats. It's generally accepted that cat's noses aren't the strongest out there, and cats usually aren't very stinky but by using scent markers the cat's find each other.
The supposed size, and reported smelliness of a Yeti, or Sasquatch, might make the range, and population density even smaller than Snow Leopard's.
There's about 40-50 new mammals discovered every year. Been that way since about the mid 1700s I believe. Some I'd consider more variations, than new, but there are new ones also.
Quote:
|
Bigfoot has supposedly been spotted all across America, not just in the Wilmore, as far as I knew the US has a fairly high population! We find skeletal remains of T-Rex but so far none from a Sasquatch? I really wish it existed too, but wishes don’t make facts go away. If there was any proof whatsoever I’d be a believer, but there isn’t any, otherwise you would post it.
|
They discover new dinosaurs all the time, also.
Quote:
So you beleive that Sasquatch exists because people said they seen one, but the fact that there is no proof of there existence is a “theory” you chose not to beleive is plauseable......... hahaha! You are certainly entitled to overlook facts in order to prove to yourself that they exist, unfortunately I have to listen to facts in order to sway my judgement.
At this point in time I have just as much faith in there being leprechauns, mermaids, and unicorns as I do there being Bigfoot, and the more I’ve researched it lately, the less likely I think they exist.
Maybe I’m out of line here, but don’t you think that if scientists actually believed in the existence of Bigfoot that they would have swarmed Slave Lake with dogs, drones, and infra red cameras to get on the trail while it’s hot?
You obviously think they exist, I’ve flat out asked both cacty and driller212 what makes them believe, but neither one has answered. Maybe you can answer just what it is that makes you a believer? Maybe you know something I don’t? I really would love to hear it.
|
Just pointing out your double standard of "proof".
I don't know if there is, but there is a some compelling evidence.