Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurt505
So you're complaining about something that never went wrong? Well that makes sense.
If they can keep a legal sized fish they will  Isn't that the idea behind retention?
By few fish you mean what? A level that has been deemed sustainable with numbers backed by a study?
I'm not against having a tag system for lakes close to large cities, but I'd like to see enough tags to keep the populations balanced.
I realize that Alberta, especially southern Alberta does not compare to other provinces, but there are northern and central lakes that compare to some of the higher pressured lakes in Saskatchewan.
I troll, I jig, I bottom bounce, slip bob,and I still fish too.
Born and raised in Alberta. |
Paragraph 1: Was I complaining or making a point? You seem to decide for me.
Para 2: Yes it is, but without collapsing fisheries.
Para 3: Many complaints about where are all the fish over 50cm. or 55 or 43
Para 4: Thats their job, not yours.
Not to mention balance takes time and not an overnight thing.
Para 5: 10 times the water and 1/4 the population. Not even close.