Quote:
Originally Posted by OldRussian
I'm sorry to here you went through the same nightmare. Please let me know if you make any progress in fighting the decision.
The fact that they are measuring in a way separate from what the regulations state is the problem.
They aren't charging guys because they know they will get egg on their face if it gets in front of a judge.
Why mandate that we leave the eye in if they don't use the eye to measure? Why don't they tell us the standard they expect to be achieved? The regs are full of full colour atv and scope ads yet the sheep regs are a couple paragraphs and a cartoon.
Here is a picture of the CO holding the old measuring device on the ram. https://www.dropbox.com/s/88iqyhht5d...20843.jpg?dl=0 |
This picture is not in perfect profile either. It does appear from that picture that it isn't legal imo. It looks like the line would pass into the dark portion of the eye if that photo was in perfect profile. Crappy deal OR.
__________________
There are some who can live without wild things, and some who cannot. Aldo Leopold
|