[QUOTE=Rust;106194]
Quote:
--Any Idea what the 3rd one was?
--DOes this not sound a little like the last project that Cormack Gates tried to do in Cypress Hill? Huge lack of Info and Statcs to support it!!!!!!!????
--And he thinks dealing with a hunter is a hassel!! HA
-- I don't think that any land owner/farmer/rancher should receive any compinsation of any sort for any crop or fence damage done by wildlife if they do not allow hunting on their land!!!!!!!
|
I think Longdraw is correct but I cannot find this anywhere in the documentation. I read and reread the terms of reference and it is not there.
In fact number 2 has changed as well. It originally read.
"Landowner should not bear the full cost of production and use of wildlife without compensation."
This is significantly different than the one they are pushing now.
Yes it sounds a lot like the Cypress program.
I have said it before and will keep saying it. This is all about money.
Bubba