Quote:
Originally Posted by 260 Rem
Notwithstanding the tragedy, this was a domestic incident and had nothing to do with gun control.
|
I agree with the domestic incident synopsis, that’s pretty cut & dried, but how do you rationalize that it has nothing to do with gun control when the article quotes a representative from Australia’s gun control lobby? Do you think for a moment that representative and their organization will not use the event as an example to further their own cause? Do you think they won’t add the body count statistics from it to every chart in their database?
Of course it’s got to do with gun control!