Quote:
Originally Posted by Arachnodisiac
From the study - literally who funded, the role that played and precisely explaining the exclusions. Yay science!
Primary Funding Source:
Novo Nordisk Foundation and Danish Ministry of Health.
Role of the Funding Source
The study was supported by a grant from the Novo Nordisk Foundation and the Danish Ministry of Health. The funder of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. Dr. Hviid had full access to all of the data in the study and had overall responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
|
A doctor paid by the MofH (assuming he is still working), is also paid to produce this study by the MofH? and is expected to be unbiased?
Ask yourself, what does he/she have to lose if these results show otherwise. If your answer was nothing, then it was unbiased.
Quote:
Results
We identified 663 236 children born to Danish-born mothers from 1 January 1999 through 31 December 2010 (Figure 1). We excluded 5775 children; 1498 had no registration in the Danish Medical Birth Registry, and 4277 were unavailable for follow-up at study entry (1 year of age) because of death (n = 2673), emigration (n = 770), unexplained disappearance from the source registers (n = 203), an autism diagnosis (n = 11), or an exclusionary diagnosis (n = 620). This resulted in a study cohort of 657 461 children contributing 5 025 754 person-years of follow-up during 1 January 2000 through 31 August 2013.
|
Fair enough, I misread that.