Quote:
Originally Posted by bobtodrick
Did you not see where Sundancefisher states 'a significant portion of information'?
You don't see the difference from something published by a respected educational/research institute and 'well some guy on Youtube says.'?
|
I take both with a grain of salt.
Sure "some guy on youtube"
might be pushing their opinions and possibly lying, but that's no different than a study.
Let me speak your language, It's kind of like winter tire tests.. isn't it funny how most tests are won by the sponsoring tire? I'm sure that has nothing to do with the test (conditions) being done to ensure the sponsors tire wins.. or that the tire manufacturer put up $100k for the test (or directly to the tester's pocket).
Was it an unbiased study? Why were ~6000 kids excluded? Where do you think that institute got the money to do the research?
Data can be manipulated any way you like. Maybe those 6000 kids disproved their theory.
At the end of the day, I have no side in the fight, but it's amazing how hypocritical people can get.