Quote:
Originally Posted by 209x50
I think this is in the very early stages as Rob has stated. A while ago the government of Alberta sued a trapline owner for the proceeds of the sale of his line. If it was considered an asset that they could sue for the revenue over it gives us a lot more rights than what the document posted here outlines. I think I will wait to see the outcome of the discussions before I load my gun. LOL
|
The only thing that is in it's early stages is Trapper and ATA input.
It would be interesting to read the documents pertaining to the lawsuit you mention and the outcome whatever it may be. Perhaps a link or GOA vs ????. I don't see how this would change the definition of a vacant line and the subsequent non conditional relinquishment and open application process. Apparently you have the option to move your assets off the line.