IMO Old Russians ram is legal as per the definition in the regulations. If interpreted to be the eyeball, then there is no case against him.
If the rule is interpreted by FW to mean the eye socket (rather than the eyeball), then we are all in trouble because FW has unilaterally moved the goal posts of what constitutes legal without telling anyone.
For those that claim that the picture is not taken in profile, have a look at his second pic (in which O.R. adjusted the jig to the eye). The jig extension (towards the camera) I believe is purposely designed to establish profile and extend it to the horn. This picture is nearly perfect profile, and the horn makes it to the line, just.
Good luck and keep us posted.
Aside: can anybody tell me whether this ram is legal? He is pretty close to perfect profile, but I can’t quite make out the eye socket
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk