08-08-2018, 11:55 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Parkland County, AB
Posts: 4,256
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by brendan's dad
For me it was a no for 2 reasons.
1. I believe that the 6mm and 243 provide an excellent rifle for both women and youth especially with reduced recoil ammunition.
and
2. Where does it end? If a manufacturer produced a .204 caliber bullet with enough weight and expansion abilities to match the .223, will we then allow .204. Why not the .17 then?
I think the minimum is currently at a good level and there is no need to change it. Still plenty of opportunity to hunt with a .223; coyotes, badgers, rabbits, and gophers for maximum effect.
|
That about sums up the .223 debate for me as well.
__________________
When applied by competent people with the right intent, common sense goes a long way.
|