Quote:
Originally Posted by 209x50
We came within a whisker of losing it all a few years backs. Backs?? That's the old Klassen fearmongering. The GOA was getting rid of the RFMA system south of highway 16 and creating a free for all. Where is your evidence? The ATA had to agree that traplines must be utilized for trapping. That was the agreement but as usual a few years, a few round table discussions and we see the abortion that came out of the simple premise.Well the ATA never conveyed what you are saying.. more BS
don't see this changing the prices or how traplines change hands. The GOA fears litigation on this and know they can't win in court.
|
Fear litigation?? That's such a joke. Where in heck do you get your information? Trapping is not a right. It is a priveledge.
Just for the record Mellon this isn't about trapline prices it's about transfers and why a Junior or Family member may be beat out in a competition for the right to be the Senior Holder on a trap line.
And Mellon maybe you don't quite get it but your time line on your statements encompass two different Governments. Maybe do some real research intead of using heresay and posts you have to correct because your "facts" are bogus.