Quote:
Originally Posted by HunterDave
I'm going to disagree with that. Our little friend would be happy to see all traplines not being used. The government didn't come up with this initiative on their own though, IMO it was Alberta trappers that pushed for it. Read post #51. It sucks for guys who recently purchased a line and/or made costly improvements but for non-RFMA holders, affordable lines is good news. That's the way that I see it.
|
We came within a whisker of losing it all a few years backs. The GOA was getting rid of the RFMA system south of highway 16 and creating a free for all. The ATA had to agree that traplines must be utilized for trapping. That was the agreement but as usual a few years, a few round table discussions and we see the abortion that came out of the simple premise. I don't see this changing the prices or how traplines change hands. The GOA fears litigation on this and know they can't win in court.