Quote:
Originally Posted by wheaty
Sorry to say East Coast your flat out wrong. I have looked at both sides of this argument and there are good points and proofs put forward by both sides in this discussion. If you dont like someones argument it doesnt mean it is not valid. Your critisism of some posts considering the historicity of the evidence of Christs existence shows that you have a poor understand of what makes a document an acceptable piece of evidence. You may not like it but it still is evidence. Evidence accepted by a large number of historians.
Many people with incredible high IQ's and seriouls levels of education who have honestly and sincerly examined the facts have come to different conclusions regarding the question of wether god exists or not. You cannot discount those people who chose the opposite side of the arguement becasue you simply disagree with them. That is not fair and frankly its intellectually small.
|
there may be proof that jesus christ exhisted, but there is little or no proof he is god, what you have is a fairy tail written 2000 years ago that proves nothing, nothing in the bible is really proveable we have never found an arc that johan made, there is no proof that there was ever a world wide flood,no proof of adam and eve, no proof of any healings of jesus, what you have are stories just like the stories of the native americans with their many gods, or any other number of religions with theirs, proof is fact, actually seeing something or being able to prove beyond the shadow of a doubt something happened, just because you think the blue door is red doesn't make it so.