Quote:
Originally Posted by jryley
nobody is arguing those point potty. Im
Saying yes youre correct, but again if limiting the bow harvest helps even a fraction then yes it is part of the solution. Its oretty sad bud that you feel exempt from putting in the time and effort to fixing the problem. Thats the attitude i hope gets trampled
Into the ground. We either practise effective conservation as a cumulative group, or we take no steps forward. If one group sacrifices opportunity its only expected the other group should be willing to do the same as part of a common goal. Should species listed as threatened be allowed
To be
Hunted by bow hunters simply because the harvest would in theory be
Miniscule? Give me a break potty. Selfish selfish selfish man.
|
Well, let's take away from everyone and all weapons, let's stop killing bucks when they are most vulnerable . Let's close the season mid nov?
And mule deer aren't listed as threatened!
I haven't heard you as a landowner step up and say. Yes us landowners are a huge problem, and something should be done, to limit our tags and make sure we actually use them where your suppose too! What do you think the % on landowners is?