Quote:
Originally Posted by Torkdiesel
Really ? So APOS could impose a ruling banning an individual from participating in the outfitting industry the same as the crown could ?
I’d love to see that one play out in court !!!
How about APOS telling the government what the non resident allocation numbers are going to be going forward, and not the other way around?
You think that will fly ?
Surely the governing body would decide all manner of process for that sector of government???
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Torkdiesel
Another way to look at it is if APOS truly is the governing body as you say they are then why does the crown impose fines and suspensions ? If APOS is responsible for sanctions and suspensions on their members then why does the crown impose fines and suspensions first ?
|
You are proving why APOS is such a mess. Their Executive and membership (past and present) will either lie in defence or are ignorant of the laws concerning their legal responsibilities.
The "Crown" has delegated the authority to APOS to create and enforce bylaws in which an outfitter and guides may lose the Privilege to participate in this business. It Is APOS's responsibility to do so, yet as we all know when you put a weasel in charge of the chickens....
Again, are you just playing dumb? This is a serious question.
The regulations and delegated authority assigned to APOS Does NOT include the ability for APOS to determine Allowable Harvest and the number of allocations or licences issued.
You are proving yourself to be a harmfully incorrect and potentially deceitful source of misinformation regarding the powers Delegated to APOS. I say potentially because as you are obviously an intelligent person and a former member of APOS, it is expected for your comments on this topic to be factual.
So here we have it, evidence of why APOS would allow Lloyd to become a Director. Many APOS members likely don't care or know what APOS can and should do, and their is no internal drive to change.
As a side note to a question asked earlier in this thread. YES, several other Alberta hunting interest groups DO require potential Executive candidates to disclose all Wildlife Act convictions, which typically will disqualify the person from being eligible to run for election.