Quote:
Originally Posted by Talking moose
You may not see them but people that spend enough time in the bush will know. And all animals leave sign. The amount of tracks and scat in an area are great indicators.
|
That's part of it.
Spending time in the Whole area plays a big part too.
Many animals if not all, utilize different parts of their range at different times.
What sundance says is correct, but it's only part of the story.
What you say is also correct but also only part of the story.
Simply walking through an area or camping in an area for a week or two is not likely to give a person much of an idea what is there.
I find it amusing how convinced the weekend warriors are that they know more then people who have lived in an area, worked, trapped, hunted and studied that area.
Not saying that's you. I think you know more then most. But clearly some here think they know more then they do.
Claiming a burned off area was once prairie is such a stretch i can't even imagine how one comes to that conclusion. It must have been forest at one time for it to be burned off don't you think.
I see no point in pursuing this discussion any further.
The subject was Lobsters, that's all I'll discuss on this thread from here on.